Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache HTTP Server VS PushOwl

Compare Apache HTTP Server VS PushOwl and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache HTTP Server logo Apache HTTP Server

Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

PushOwl logo PushOwl

Re-engage website visitors with push notifications
  • Apache HTTP Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-21
  • PushOwl Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-18

Apache HTTP Server features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache HTTP Server is open source, meaning it is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. This promotes a large, active community that contributes to its maintenance and improvement.
  • Cross-Platform
    Apache is compatible with a variety of operating systems, including Unix, Linux, and Windows, providing flexibility and widespread usability.
  • Highly Customizable
    It offers a modular architecture that allows users to enable or disable features as needed, and to extend functionality through modules.
  • Robust Documentation
    Apache provides comprehensive and detailed documentation, which makes it easier for users to install, configure, and troubleshoot the server.
  • Widespread Adoption
    With its long history and widespread use, Apache has proven to be reliable and trusted by many organizations worldwide, ensuring a level of trust and stability.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Apache includes many features out-of-the-box, such as SSL/TLS support, URL redirection, authentication, load balancing, and more.

Possible disadvantages of Apache HTTP Server

  • Performance Overhead
    Compared to some lightweight web servers like Nginx, Apache can have higher memory and CPU usage, which may not be ideal for high concurrency needs.
  • Complex Configuration
    Apache's extensive customization options can lead to a complex configuration process, which may be challenging for beginners or those without specific expertise.
  • Less Efficient in Serving Static Content
    While Apache is highly capable, it may be less efficient at serving static content compared to specialized web servers like Nginx.
  • Initial Learning Curve
    Due to its rich features and configurability, new users might face a steep learning curve when first setting up and using Apache HTTP Server.
  • Module Compatibility Issues
    Sometimes, third-party modules may not always be compatible with the latest versions of Apache, causing potential integration issues.

PushOwl features and specs

  • Easy Integration
    PushOwl offers seamless integration with various e-commerce platforms, making it easy for merchants to set up and start using.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform provides an intuitive dashboard and user interface that simplifies the process of sending and managing push notifications.
  • Automated Campaigns
    PushOwl supports automated campaigns like abandoned cart recovery, which helps boost sales with minimal manual effort.
  • High Delivery Rates
    Push notifications sent via PushOwl generally have high delivery rates, ensuring that messages reach a large percentage of subscribers.
  • Customization
    It offers various customization options, allowing businesses to tailor notifications to fit their brand and target audience effectively.
  • Analytics and Reporting
    PushOwl provides comprehensive analytics and reporting features, helping businesses track the performance of their push notification campaigns.
  • Customer Support
    The platform offers reliable customer support to help users troubleshoot and make the most out of the service.

Possible disadvantages of PushOwl

  • Cost
    While PushOwl offers a free plan, its premium features can become expensive for small businesses as they scale up.
  • Limited Audience
    Push notifications can only reach users who have opted in, which may limit the overall audience size compared to other marketing channels.
  • Browser Dependence
    Effectiveness can vary across different browsers and devices, as not all support push notifications equally well.
  • Potential Intrusiveness
    If not used judiciously, push notifications can become intrusive and lead to user annoyance and higher opt-out rates.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, new users might still face a learning curve to fully understand and utilize all features effectively.
  • Content Restrictions
    Certain types of content, such as large images or videos, are not well supported, limiting the richness of the notifications.

Apache HTTP Server videos

No Apache HTTP Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

PushOwl videos

PUSHOWL SHOPIFY APP - HONEST REVIEW by ecomexperts.io

More videos:

  • Demo - Pushowl Demo, Web Push Notifications: In 5 Minutes or Less | Ecommerce Tech

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache HTTP Server and PushOwl)
Web And Application Servers
Web Push Notifications
0 0%
100% 100
Web Servers
100 100%
0% 0
Mobile Push Messaging
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache HTTP Server and PushOwl. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache HTTP Server and PushOwl

Apache HTTP Server Reviews

9 Best XAMPP Alternatives Cross Platform Web Server
However, compared to XAMPP and other popular web servers in the market Apache HTTP Server is a bit more complicated and is a little difficult to navigate for a complete newbie, but if you want to understand web development from the very fundamentals and understand how Apache as a web server software works then this software can be of great help to you.
Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown
The most commonly used Web Server is by far Apache HTTP Server from the Software Apache Foundation. Created in 1995 by Rob McCool and Brian Behlendorf, among others. The name is a pun for A PatCHy server, as at the time of it’s inception, Apache was based on some existing code, along with some perhaps “hacky or clunky” software packages, enabling it to run. Additionally, the...
Source: chemicloud.com
10 Best alternatives of XAMPP servers for Windows, Linux and macOS
Apache is an open-source and free web server software that owns about 46% of websites worldwide. The official name is Apache HTTP Server and is maintained and developed by the Apache Software Foundation. This allows website owners to serve content on the web – hence the name “webserver”.
Top 5 open source web servers
As the Apache HTTP Server has been the most popular web server since 1996, it "benefits from great documentation and integrated support from other software projects." You can find more information on the Apache Foundation project page.
Source: opensource.com

PushOwl Reviews

35 Best Free Push Notification Services and Tools (+ Open Source Push Notification Services to Consider)
PushOwl is yet another conversion tool for Shopify stores with a focus on push notifications. It has eCommerce-focused features like abandoned cart reminders, back-in stock alerts, and campaigns. PushOwl has a free tier that can be used for up to 500 impressions every month.
12 Best Push Notification Services to Rely on in 2024
PushOwl promises super quick integration, multi-lingual support, a smooth opt-in process for your visitors, automated messages, and regular reports so you can optimize your push campaign.
Source: notix.co

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache HTTP Server seems to be a lot more popular than PushOwl. While we know about 66 links to Apache HTTP Server, we've tracked only 1 mention of PushOwl. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache HTTP Server mentions (66)

  • Unveiling GNU Free Documentation License 1.3: A Comprehensive Exploration of Its Depths, Applications, and Future Trends
    Example: Various technical documentation projects on platforms like Apache HTTP Server have implemented GFDL clauses to safeguard documentation integrity. - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
  • Open Source: A Goldmine for Indie Hackers
    Open source software is built on the democratic idea that everyone should be able to inspect and contribute to the source code. Major projects like Linux, WordPress, and the Apache HTTP Server have shown how collaborative efforts can produce robust, scalable solutions. Indie hackers, often working with limited budgets, gain access to highly dependable tools such as Python and MySQL, which were originally developed... - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
  • Unveiling a Licensing Legend: The Netscape Public License 1.1
    The Netscape Public License 1.1 served as a crucial stepping stone for modern open source licensing models. Developed by Netscape Communications Corporation, it was designed to encourage global community collaboration while safeguarding intellectual property. During the rise of the open source movement, the license provided a much-needed balance between transparency and control, making it a frequent subject of... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Unveiling GNU FDL 1.2: A Deep Dive into Free Documentation Licensing
    Adoption, Use Cases, and Comparative Analysis: Projects ranging from community manuals to major software endeavors like the Apache HTTP Server have adopted the GNU FDL 1.2 to preserve the spirit of open documentation. While its copyleft nature ensures that every modification remains free, critics argue that the rigidity of the license may deter commercial integration. This is contrasted with alternative licensing... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Unveiling GNU FDL 1.1: A Deep Dive into Free Documentation Licensing
    GNU FDL 1.1 was created by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) with the intent of bringing the same freedoms found in free software to documentation. Many notable projects, including those under the aegis of the Apache HTTP Server, have benefited from a documentation license that guarantees continued openness and proper attribution. Throughout our exploration, we will delve into the evolution, strengths, and... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

PushOwl mentions (1)

  • [Hiring] Senior frontend dev in India
    We are looking for Frontend Developer at @pushowl https://pushowl.com/. Source: almost 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache HTTP Server and PushOwl, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Truepush - Unleash limitless possibilities with Truepush and save up to $600 monthly. Free up to 10K Subscribers on all features.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

iZooto - Engage your mobile and desktop web users with intelligent web push notifications.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Pusher - Pusher is a hosted API for quickly, easily and securely adding scalable realtime functionality via WebSockets to web and mobile apps.