Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache HTTP Server VS Apache Rivet

Compare Apache HTTP Server VS Apache Rivet and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Apache HTTP Server logo Apache HTTP Server

Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

Apache Rivet logo Apache Rivet

Other Web Frameworks
  • Apache HTTP Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-21
  • Apache Rivet Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-05

Apache HTTP Server features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache HTTP Server is open source, meaning it is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. This promotes a large, active community that contributes to its maintenance and improvement.
  • Cross-Platform
    Apache is compatible with a variety of operating systems, including Unix, Linux, and Windows, providing flexibility and widespread usability.
  • Highly Customizable
    It offers a modular architecture that allows users to enable or disable features as needed, and to extend functionality through modules.
  • Robust Documentation
    Apache provides comprehensive and detailed documentation, which makes it easier for users to install, configure, and troubleshoot the server.
  • Widespread Adoption
    With its long history and widespread use, Apache has proven to be reliable and trusted by many organizations worldwide, ensuring a level of trust and stability.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Apache includes many features out-of-the-box, such as SSL/TLS support, URL redirection, authentication, load balancing, and more.

Possible disadvantages of Apache HTTP Server

  • Performance Overhead
    Compared to some lightweight web servers like Nginx, Apache can have higher memory and CPU usage, which may not be ideal for high concurrency needs.
  • Complex Configuration
    Apache's extensive customization options can lead to a complex configuration process, which may be challenging for beginners or those without specific expertise.
  • Less Efficient in Serving Static Content
    While Apache is highly capable, it may be less efficient at serving static content compared to specialized web servers like Nginx.
  • Initial Learning Curve
    Due to its rich features and configurability, new users might face a steep learning curve when first setting up and using Apache HTTP Server.
  • Module Compatibility Issues
    Sometimes, third-party modules may not always be compatible with the latest versions of Apache, causing potential integration issues.

Apache Rivet features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache HTTP Server and Apache Rivet)

Apache HTTP Server

Apache Rivet

Web And Application Servers
98 98%
Web And Application Servers
2% 2
Web Servers
98 98%
Web Servers
2% 2
Application Server
97 97%
Application Server
3% 3
Development Tools
100 100%
Development Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache HTTP Server and Apache Rivet. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache HTTP Server and Apache Rivet

Apache HTTP Server Reviews

9 Best XAMPP Alternatives Cross Platform Web Server
However, compared to XAMPP and other popular web servers in the market Apache HTTP Server is a bit more complicated and is a little difficult to navigate for a complete newbie, but if you want to understand web development from the very fundamentals and understand how Apache as a web server software works then this software can be of great help to you.
Source: technicalustad.com
Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown
The most commonly used Web Server is by far Apache HTTP Server from the Software Apache Foundation. Created in 1995 by Rob McCool and Brian Behlendorf, among others. The name is a pun for A PatCHy server, as at the time of it’s inception, Apache was based on some existing code, along with some perhaps “hacky or clunky” software packages, enabling it to run. Additionally, the...
Source: chemicloud.com
10 Best alternatives of XAMPP servers for Windows, Linux and macOS
Apache is an open-source and free web server software that owns about 46% of websites worldwide. The official name is Apache HTTP Server and is maintained and developed by the Apache Software Foundation. This allows website owners to serve content on the web – hence the name “webserver”.
Source: www.isrgrajan.com
Top 5 open source web servers
As the Apache HTTP Server has been the most popular web server since 1996, it "benefits from great documentation and integrated support from other software projects." You can find more information on the Apache Foundation project page.
Source: opensource.com

Apache Rivet Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Rivet yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache HTTP Server seems to be a lot more popular than Apache Rivet. While we know about 65 links to Apache HTTP Server, we've tracked only 1 mention of Apache Rivet. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache HTTP Server mentions (65)

  • Open Source: A Goldmine for Indie Hackers
    Open source software is built on the democratic idea that everyone should be able to inspect and contribute to the source code. Major projects like Linux, WordPress, and the Apache HTTP Server have shown how collaborative efforts can produce robust, scalable solutions. Indie hackers, often working with limited budgets, gain access to highly dependable tools such as Python and MySQL, which were originally developed... - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
  • Unveiling a Licensing Legend: The Netscape Public License 1.1
    The Netscape Public License 1.1 served as a crucial stepping stone for modern open source licensing models. Developed by Netscape Communications Corporation, it was designed to encourage global community collaboration while safeguarding intellectual property. During the rise of the open source movement, the license provided a much-needed balance between transparency and control, making it a frequent subject of... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Unveiling GNU FDL 1.2: A Deep Dive into Free Documentation Licensing
    Adoption, Use Cases, and Comparative Analysis: Projects ranging from community manuals to major software endeavors like the Apache HTTP Server have adopted the GNU FDL 1.2 to preserve the spirit of open documentation. While its copyleft nature ensures that every modification remains free, critics argue that the rigidity of the license may deter commercial integration. This is contrasted with alternative licensing... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Unveiling GNU FDL 1.1: A Deep Dive into Free Documentation Licensing
    GNU FDL 1.1 was created by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) with the intent of bringing the same freedoms found in free software to documentation. Many notable projects, including those under the aegis of the Apache HTTP Server, have benefited from a documentation license that guarantees continued openness and proper attribution. Throughout our exploration, we will delve into the evolution, strengths, and... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Unveiling SISSL 1.1: A New Era in Open Source Fairness
    Community Engagement and Legal Robustness: The license has garnered attention not just for its legal precision but also for its emphasis on community fairness. Developers find reassurance in clear, transparent clauses that protect their rights while simultaneously opening avenues for innovation. The Apache HTTP Server serves as one notable example of a project that embraced similar principles in fostering a... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

Apache Rivet mentions (1)

  • AOLserver is America Online's Open-Source web server
    I created, with some other people, what went on to become Apache Rivet: https://tcl.apache.org/rivet/ It did less than AOLserver, but was also very lightweight and easy to integrate with Apache. For a long time, https://flightaware.com/ used Rivet under the hood. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache HTTP Server and Apache Rivet, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

AOL Server - AOL Server is an open-source web server used for large scale, dynamic web sites.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

OpenResty - Turning Nginx into a Full-fledged Web App Server

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

XAMPP - XAMPP is a free and open-source cross-platform web server that is primarily used when locally developing web applications.

Loading...