Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache Hive VS Apache Beam

Compare Apache Hive VS Apache Beam and see what are their differences

Electe
Discover Electe, our data analytics platform dedicated to SMEs. Don't let your data go unused, take your business into the future! featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache Hive logo Apache Hive

Apache Hive data warehouse software facilitates querying and managing large datasets residing in distributed storage.

Apache Beam logo Apache Beam

Apache Beam provides an advanced unified programming model to implement batch and streaming data processing jobs.
  • Apache Hive Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-13
  • Apache Beam Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-31

Apache Hive features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache Hive is built on top of Hadoop, allowing it to efficiently handle large datasets by distributing the load across a cluster of machines.
  • SQL-like Interface
    Hive provides a familiar SQL-like querying language, HiveQL, which makes it easier for users with SQL knowledge to perform data analysis on large datasets without needing to learn a new syntax.
  • Integration with Hadoop Ecosystem
    Hive integrates seamlessly with other components of the Hadoop ecosystem such as HDFS for storage and MapReduce for processing, making it a versatile tool for big data processing.
  • Schema on Read
    Hive uses a schema-on-read model which allows it to work with flexible data schemas and handle unstructured or semi-structured data efficiently.
  • Extensibility
    Users can extend Hive's capabilities by writing custom UDFs (User Defined Functions), UDAFs (User Defined Aggregate Functions), and SerDes (Serializers/ Deserializers).

Possible disadvantages of Apache Hive

  • Latency in Query Processing
    Queries in Hive often take longer to execute compared to traditional databases, as they are converted to MapReduce jobs which can introduce significant latency.
  • Limited Real-time Processing
    Hive is designed for batch processing and is not suitable for real-time analytics due to its reliance on MapReduce, which is not optimized for low-latency operations.
  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up Hive and configuring it to work optimally within a Hadoop cluster can be complex and require a significant amount of effort and expertise.
  • Lack of Support for Transactions
    Hive does not natively support full ACID transactions, which can be a limitation for applications that require consistent transaction management across large datasets.
  • Dependency on Hadoop
    Hive's reliance on the Hadoop ecosystem means it inherits some of Hadoop's limitations, such as a steep learning curve and the need for substantial resources to manage a cluster.

Apache Beam features and specs

  • Unified Model
    Apache Beam provides a unified programming model that simplifies the development of both batch and stream processing applications. This reduces the complexity in maintaining separate codebases for different types of data processing needs.
  • Portability
    The portability of Apache Beam allows developers to write their code once and run it on different execution engines like Apache Flink, Apache Spark, and Google Cloud Dataflow, offering flexibility in choosing the right runtime environment.
  • Rich SDKs
    Apache Beam offers rich SDKs for multiple languages including Java, Python, and Go, allowing a broader range of developers to leverage its capabilities without being restricted to a single programming language.
  • Windowing and Triggering
    It provides powerful abstractions for windowing and triggering, enabling developers to handle out-of-order data and late data arrivals efficiently, which is crucial for accurate stream processing.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Beam

  • Complexity
    Although Apache Beam simplifies certain aspects of data processing, its unified model and advanced features can introduce complexity, making it potentially challenging for developers unfamiliar with distributed data processing concepts.
  • Limited Language Support
    While Apache Beam supports Java, Python, and Go, the level of feature support and maturity can vary between these SDKs, which might limit adoption for developers using other programming languages.
  • Performance Overhead
    The abstraction layer provided by Beam to ensure portability might result in a performance overhead compared to using execution engines directly, potentially affecting performance-sensitive applications.
  • Evolving Ecosystem
    As an evolving framework, Apache Beam’s APIs and ecosystem components might change over time, requiring continuous learning and adaptation from developers to keep up with the latest updates and best practices.

Apache Hive videos

+ Add

Hive vs Impala - Comparing Apache Hive vs Apache Impala

Apache Beam videos

+ Add

How to Write Batch or Streaming Data Pipelines with Apache Beam in 15 mins with James Malone

More videos:

  • Review - Best practices towards a production-ready pipeline with Apache Beam
  • Review - Streaming data into Apache Beam with Kafka

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Hive and Apache Beam)

Apache Hive

Apache Beam

Databases
100 100%
Databases
0% 0
Big Data
50 50%
Big Data
50% 50
Data Dashboard
0 0%
Data Dashboard
100% 100
Relational Databases
100 100%
Relational Databases
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Hive and Apache Beam. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Beam should be more popular than Apache Hive. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Hive mentions (8)

View more

Apache Beam mentions (15)

  • A Quick Developer’s Guide to Effective Data Engineering
    Use distributed data processing frameworks like Apache Beam or Apache Spark. - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
  • Ask HN: Does (or why does) anyone use MapReduce anymore?
    The "streaming systems" book answers your question and more: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/streaming-systems/9781491983867/. It gives you a history of how batch processing started with MapReduce, and how attempts at scaling by moving towards streaming systems gave us all the subsequent frameworks (Spark, Beam, etc.). As for the framework called MapReduce, it isn't used much, but its descendant... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • How do Streaming Aggregation Pipelines work?
    Apache Beam is one of many tools that you can use. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Real Time Data Infra Stack
    Apache Beam: Streaming framework which can be run on several runner such as Apache Flink and GCP Dataflow. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Google Cloud Reference
    Apache Beam: Batch/streaming data processing 🔗Link. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Hive and Apache Beam, you can also consider the following products

ClickHouse - ClickHouse is an open-source column-oriented database management system that allows generating analytical data reports in real time.

Google Cloud Dataflow - Google Cloud Dataflow is a fully-managed cloud service and programming model for batch and streaming big data processing.

Apache Doris - Apache Doris is an open-source real-time data warehouse for big data analytics.

Google BigQuery - A fully managed data warehouse for large-scale data analytics.

Apache Spark - Apache Spark is an engine for big data processing, with built-in modules for streaming, SQL, machine learning and graph processing.

Qubole - Qubole delivers a self-service platform for big aata analytics built on Amazon, Microsoft and Google Clouds.

Loading...