Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Cassandra VS Spanning

Compare Apache Cassandra VS Spanning and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache Cassandra logo Apache Cassandra

The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.

Spanning logo Spanning

Spanning provides data backup and recovery solutions for companies running cloud applications.
  • Apache Cassandra Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17
  • Spanning Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04

Apache Cassandra features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache Cassandra is designed for linear scalability and can handle large volumes of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure.
  • High Availability
    Cassandra ensures high availability by replicating data across multiple nodes. Even if some nodes fail, the system remains operational.
  • Performance
    It provides fast writes and reads by using a peer-to-peer architecture, making it highly suitable for applications requiring quick data access.
  • Flexible Data Model
    Cassandra supports a flexible schema, allowing users to add new columns to a table at any time, making it adaptable for various use cases.
  • Geographical Distribution
    Data can be distributed across multiple data centers, ensuring low-latency access for geographically distributed users.
  • No Single Point of Failure
    Its decentralized nature ensures there is no single point of failure, which enhances resilience and fault-tolerance.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Cassandra

  • Complexity
    Managing and configuring Cassandra can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and skills for optimal performance.
  • Eventual Consistency
    Cassandra follows an eventual consistency model, meaning that there might be a delay before all nodes have the latest data, which may not be suitable for all use cases.
  • Write-heavy Operations
    Although Cassandra handles writes efficiently, write-heavy workloads can lead to compaction issues and increased read latency.
  • Limited Query Capabilities
    Cassandra's query capabilities are relatively limited compared to traditional RDBMS, lacking support for complex joins and aggregations.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Regular maintenance tasks such as node repair and compaction are necessary to ensure optimal performance, adding to the administrative overhead.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    While the ecosystem for Cassandra is growing, it is still not as extensive or mature as those for some other database technologies.

Spanning features and specs

  • Automated Backups
    Spanning provides automated backups for cloud applications like Google Workspace, Office 365, and Salesforce, ensuring that user data is consistently saved without manual intervention.
  • Easy Restore
    The platform offers easy restore options, allowing users to quickly recover lost or corrupted data, thereby minimizing downtime and the risk of data loss.
  • Security and Compliance
    Spanning includes robust security features and compliance certifications, ensuring that backed-up data is secure and adheres to industry regulations.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The service comes with an intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to manage their backups and perform restores, even without extensive technical knowledge.
  • Comprehensive Coverage
    Spanning supports multiple cloud platforms, providing a comprehensive solution for organizations using various cloud services.

Possible disadvantages of Spanning

  • Cost
    The service can be expensive for small businesses or individuals compared to other backup solutions, especially when multiple user licenses are required.
  • Limited Customization
    While it offers essential backup and restore functionalities, the platform may lack advanced customization options that might be available in other specialized backup solutions.
  • Dependency on Cloud Services
    Spanning's effectiveness is inherently tied to the availability and performance of the cloud services it supports, which could be a limitation if those services experience downtime or issues.
  • Integration Complexity
    For organizations with complex IT environments or legacy systems, integrating Spanning with existing infrastructure might require additional time and resources.
  • Feature Set
    Some users may find that Spanning’s feature set is limited compared to more advanced or niche backup solutions that provide additional functionalities and options.

Apache Cassandra videos

Course Intro | DS101: Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

Spanning videos

Spanning Backup for Office 365: Product Demo

More videos:

  • Review - Review: Spanning BackUp and Discount Code
  • Review - Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) for CCNA R/S (200-125) and ICND2 (200-105) Candidates

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Cassandra and Spanning)
Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Backup And Disaster Recovery
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Cassandra and Spanning. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Cassandra and Spanning

Apache Cassandra Reviews

16 Top Big Data Analytics Tools You Should Know About
Application Areas: If you want to work with SQL-like data types on a No-SQL database, Cassandra is a good choice. It is a popular pick in the IoT, fraud detection applications, recommendation engines, product catalogs and playlists, and messaging applications, providing fast real-time insights.
9 Best MongoDB alternatives in 2019
The Apache Cassandra is an ideal choice for you if you want scalability and high availability without affecting its performance. This MongoDB alternative tool offers support for replicating across multiple datacenters.
Source: www.guru99.com

Spanning Reviews

We have no reviews of Spanning yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Cassandra seems to be a lot more popular than Spanning. While we know about 44 links to Apache Cassandra, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Spanning. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Cassandra mentions (44)

  • Why You Shouldn’t Invest In Vector Databases?
    In fact, even in the absence of these commercial databases, users can effortlessly install PostgreSQL and leverage its built-in pgvector functionality for vector search. PostgreSQL stands as the benchmark in the realm of open-source databases, offering comprehensive support across various domains of database management. It excels in transaction processing (e.g., CockroachDB), online analytics (e.g., DuckDB),... - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
  • Data integrity in Ably Pub/Sub
    All messages are persisted durably for two minutes, but Pub/Sub channels can be configured to persist messages for longer periods of time using the persisted messages feature. Persisted messages are additionally written to Cassandra. Multiple copies of the message are stored in a quorum of globally-distributed Cassandra nodes. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Which Database is Perfect for You? A Comprehensive Guide to MySQL, PostgreSQL, NoSQL, and More
    Cassandra is a highly scalable, distributed NoSQL database designed to handle large amounts of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Consistent Hashing: An Overview and Implementation in Golang
    Distributed storage Distributed storage systems like Cassandra, DynamoDB, and Voldemort also use consistent hashing. In these systems, data is partitioned across many servers. Consistent hashing is used to map data to the servers that store the data. When new servers are added or removed, consistent hashing minimizes the amount of data that needs to be remapped to different servers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Understanding SQL vs. NoSQL Databases: A Beginner's Guide
    On the other hand, NoSQL databases are non-relational databases. They store data in flexible, JSON-like documents, key-value pairs, or wide-column stores. Examples include MongoDB, Couchbase, and Cassandra. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Spanning mentions (3)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Cassandra and Spanning, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

ManageWP - ManageWP is a service for bloggers, site owners and web based companies helping them manage multiple WordPress sites from one dashboard.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

CrashPlan - CrashPlan for Small Business backup software offers the best way to back up and store business & enterprise data securely - offsite, onsite & online in the Cloud.

ArangoDB - A distributed open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values.

Backblaze - Backblaze's remote backup automatically backs up your data to our secure datacenter.