Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache Cassandra VS Particle.io

Compare Apache Cassandra VS Particle.io and see what are their differences

Hive
Seamless project management and collaboration for your team. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache Cassandra logo Apache Cassandra

The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.

Particle.io logo Particle.io

Particle is an IoT platform enabling businesses to build, connect and manage their connected solutions.
  • Apache Cassandra Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17
  • Particle.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23

Apache Cassandra features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache Cassandra is designed for linear scalability and can handle large volumes of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure.
  • High Availability
    Cassandra ensures high availability by replicating data across multiple nodes. Even if some nodes fail, the system remains operational.
  • Performance
    It provides fast writes and reads by using a peer-to-peer architecture, making it highly suitable for applications requiring quick data access.
  • Flexible Data Model
    Cassandra supports a flexible schema, allowing users to add new columns to a table at any time, making it adaptable for various use cases.
  • Geographical Distribution
    Data can be distributed across multiple data centers, ensuring low-latency access for geographically distributed users.
  • No Single Point of Failure
    Its decentralized nature ensures there is no single point of failure, which enhances resilience and fault-tolerance.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Cassandra

  • Complexity
    Managing and configuring Cassandra can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and skills for optimal performance.
  • Eventual Consistency
    Cassandra follows an eventual consistency model, meaning that there might be a delay before all nodes have the latest data, which may not be suitable for all use cases.
  • Write-heavy Operations
    Although Cassandra handles writes efficiently, write-heavy workloads can lead to compaction issues and increased read latency.
  • Limited Query Capabilities
    Cassandra's query capabilities are relatively limited compared to traditional RDBMS, lacking support for complex joins and aggregations.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Regular maintenance tasks such as node repair and compaction are necessary to ensure optimal performance, adding to the administrative overhead.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    While the ecosystem for Cassandra is growing, it is still not as extensive or mature as those for some other database technologies.

Particle.io features and specs

  • Comprehensive IoT Ecosystem
    Particle.io offers a complete IoT ecosystem with hardware, software, and cloud integration, making it easier for developers to build, deploy, and manage IoT solutions.
  • Device Management
    It provides robust device management features, allowing users to monitor and control a large number of devices remotely, ensuring better scalability and maintenance.
  • Cloud Connectivity
    Particle’s devices come with built-in cloud connectivity, which saves time and effort in setting up secure and reliable communications for IoT devices.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Particle.io offers extensive and well-organized documentation, making it easier for both beginners and experienced developers to get started and troubleshoot issues.
  • Community Support
    Particle.io has a strong community of developers who contribute to forums and share knowledge, aiding in problem-solving and project development.
  • Security
    Particle prioritizes security, providing features like over-the-air updates, secure boot, and encrypted communications, ensuring that IoT deployments are secure.
  • Development Tools
    It offers powerful development tools, including a web IDE, local development environment, and mobile app, catering to different user preferences.

Possible disadvantages of Particle.io

  • Cost
    Particle’s comprehensive solution can be more expensive compared to other DIY or less integrated IoT solutions, potentially making it less appealing for hobbyists or budget-constrained projects.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite extensive documentation, the breadth of features and services may present a steeper learning curve for new users or those less familiar with IoT concepts.
  • Hardware Dependence
    Users may find themselves dependent on Particle’s specific hardware offerings, which could limit flexibility or increase costs if alternative hardware needs to be integrated.
  • Service Dependency
    Reliance on Particle’s cloud services implies that any service downtime or changes in service terms could impact one's IoT projects significantly.
  • Complexity
    For simple IoT applications, the extensive features of Particle.io might be overkill, adding unnecessary complexity to projects that do not require advanced capabilities.

Apache Cassandra videos

+ Add

Course Intro | DS101: Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

Particle.io videos

+ Add

Particle All In One Face Cream For Men Review | thatsNathan

More videos:

  • Review - MEN'S SKIN CARE ROUTINE ! ( PARTICLE CREAM REVIEW )
  • Tutorial - THE BEST MEN'S SKIN CARE ROUTINE! ( PARTICLE FOR MEN FACE WASH REVIEW ) How To Have Great Skin!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Cassandra and Particle.io)

Apache Cassandra

Particle.io

Databases
100 100%
Databases
0% 0
IoT Platform
0 0%
IoT Platform
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
NoSQL Databases
0% 0
Data Dashboard
0 0%
Data Dashboard
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Cassandra and Particle.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Cassandra and Particle.io

Apache Cassandra Reviews

16 Top Big Data Analytics Tools You Should Know About
Application Areas: If you want to work with SQL-like data types on a No-SQL database, Cassandra is a good choice. It is a popular pick in the IoT, fraud detection applications, recommendation engines, product catalogs and playlists, and messaging applications, providing fast real-time insights.
Source: www.analytixlabs.co.in
9 Best MongoDB alternatives in 2019
The Apache Cassandra is an ideal choice for you if you want scalability and high availability without affecting its performance. This MongoDB alternative tool offers support for replicating across multiple datacenters.
Source: www.guru99.com

Particle.io Reviews

Best IoT Platforms in 2022 for Small Business
The IoT solutions offered by Particle are fully integrated and it is an easy to use IoT platform with built-in infrastructure. The particle’s operating system and the Device OS are the differentiators as it expedites the complex integration between firmware, hardware, and network connectivity on all Particle devices.
Source: www.fogwing.io
Open Source Internet of Things (IoT) Platforms
Self-describing as a “complete edge-to-cloud platform”, Particle.io also contains all the building blocks for developing an IoT product. This includes connectivity, device management, and even the hardware required to prototype IoT solutions and scale quickly thanks to the robust infrastructure. The platform supports IoT data collection and over-the-air development in a...
Source: jansutris10.medium.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Cassandra should be more popular than Particle.io. It has been mentiond 44 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Cassandra mentions (44)

  • Why You Shouldn’t Invest In Vector Databases?
    In fact, even in the absence of these commercial databases, users can effortlessly install PostgreSQL and leverage its built-in pgvector functionality for vector search. PostgreSQL stands as the benchmark in the realm of open-source databases, offering comprehensive support across various domains of database management. It excels in transaction processing (e.g., CockroachDB), online analytics (e.g., DuckDB),... - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago
  • Data integrity in Ably Pub/Sub
    All messages are persisted durably for two minutes, but Pub/Sub channels can be configured to persist messages for longer periods of time using the persisted messages feature. Persisted messages are additionally written to Cassandra. Multiple copies of the message are stored in a quorum of globally-distributed Cassandra nodes. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Which Database is Perfect for You? A Comprehensive Guide to MySQL, PostgreSQL, NoSQL, and More
    Cassandra is a highly scalable, distributed NoSQL database designed to handle large amounts of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Consistent Hashing: An Overview and Implementation in Golang
    Distributed storage Distributed storage systems like Cassandra, DynamoDB, and Voldemort also use consistent hashing. In these systems, data is partitioned across many servers. Consistent hashing is used to map data to the servers that store the data. When new servers are added or removed, consistent hashing minimizes the amount of data that needs to be remapped to different servers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Understanding SQL vs. NoSQL Databases: A Beginner's Guide
    On the other hand, NoSQL databases are non-relational databases. They store data in flexible, JSON-like documents, key-value pairs, or wide-column stores. Examples include MongoDB, Couchbase, and Cassandra. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Particle.io mentions (9)

  • What hardware do I need for a robot to upload information to the cloud?
    Look into AWS Greengrass, Robomaker, etc. If you're looking for more customization. Or you could use an all-in-one product like from particle.io if you'd more of an out-of-the-box solution. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Web developer becoming embedded engineer?
    5) look at using a GPRS or LTE (look at particle.io) cell monitor a fridge or freezer. Source: over 3 years ago
  • KnowYourCrypto #51: BitTorrent Token (BTT)
    I really dig your KYC reports. Please do Particl particle.io next :). Source: over 3 years ago
  • Cloud solution for ESP8266
    That's not how I read the OP's proposal. It sounds more like they want to build something like the service that http://particle.io/ appears to provide. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Ray Ozzie's latest venture is a cheap IoT board with flat rate connectivity
    Looks cool! How does this differ from http://particle.io ? - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Cassandra and Particle.io, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

AWS IoT - Easily and securely connect devices to the cloud.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Azure IoT Hub - Manage billions of IoT devices with Azure IoT Hub, a cloud platform that lets you easily connect, monitor, provision, and configure IoT devices.

ArangoDB - A distributed open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values.

AWS Greengrass - Local compute, messaging, data caching, and synch capabilities for connected devices

Loading...