Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Cassandra VS Automerge

Compare Apache Cassandra VS Automerge and see what are their differences

Apache Cassandra logo Apache Cassandra

The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.

Automerge logo Automerge

A JSON-like data structure (a CRDT) that can be modified concurrently by different users, and merged again automatically.
  • Apache Cassandra Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17
  • Automerge Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-02

Apache Cassandra features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache Cassandra is designed for linear scalability and can handle large volumes of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure.
  • High Availability
    Cassandra ensures high availability by replicating data across multiple nodes. Even if some nodes fail, the system remains operational.
  • Performance
    It provides fast writes and reads by using a peer-to-peer architecture, making it highly suitable for applications requiring quick data access.
  • Flexible Data Model
    Cassandra supports a flexible schema, allowing users to add new columns to a table at any time, making it adaptable for various use cases.
  • Geographical Distribution
    Data can be distributed across multiple data centers, ensuring low-latency access for geographically distributed users.
  • No Single Point of Failure
    Its decentralized nature ensures there is no single point of failure, which enhances resilience and fault-tolerance.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Cassandra

  • Complexity
    Managing and configuring Cassandra can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and skills for optimal performance.
  • Eventual Consistency
    Cassandra follows an eventual consistency model, meaning that there might be a delay before all nodes have the latest data, which may not be suitable for all use cases.
  • Write-heavy Operations
    Although Cassandra handles writes efficiently, write-heavy workloads can lead to compaction issues and increased read latency.
  • Limited Query Capabilities
    Cassandra's query capabilities are relatively limited compared to traditional RDBMS, lacking support for complex joins and aggregations.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Regular maintenance tasks such as node repair and compaction are necessary to ensure optimal performance, adding to the administrative overhead.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    While the ecosystem for Cassandra is growing, it is still not as extensive or mature as those for some other database technologies.

Automerge features and specs

  • Conflict Resolution
    Automerge uses CRDTs to offer automatic conflict resolution, allowing concurrent edits without manual merging.
  • Offline Support
    Automerge enables applications to work offline by keeping track of changes locally and syncing when back online.
  • Ease of Use
    The library provides a simple API that makes it easy to integrate into applications that require real-time collaboration.
  • No Central Server Requirement
    Automerge allows peer-to-peer communication, which can reduce the need for a centralized server to handle document changes.
  • Version Control
    Automatically keeps track of document history and changes, which can be useful for version control and auditing purposes.

Possible disadvantages of Automerge

  • Performance
    Automerge can consume significant memory and processing power, particularly in large documents or with frequent updates.
  • Complexity of CRDTs
    For developers unfamiliar with Conflict-free Replicated Data Types, understanding and implementing them can present a steep learning curve.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    As a relatively niche tool, Automerge has a smaller community and fewer available third-party integrations compared to more established libraries.
  • Data Structure Limitations
    Automerge supports a limited set of data structures, which can constrain the kinds of applications for which it is suitable.
  • Network Overhead
    The peer-to-peer and CRDT nature of Automerge may lead to increased network traffic, which can be problematic in bandwidth-constrained environments.

Apache Cassandra videos

Course Intro | DS101: Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

Automerge videos

Automerge: a new foundation for collaboration software

More videos:

  • Review - Creating Local-First Collaboration Software with Automerge • Martin Kleppmann • GOTO 2023

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Cassandra and Automerge)
Databases
94 94%
6% 6
NoSQL Databases
94 94%
6% 6
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Relational Databases
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Cassandra and Automerge. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Cassandra and Automerge

Apache Cassandra Reviews

16 Top Big Data Analytics Tools You Should Know About
Application Areas: If you want to work with SQL-like data types on a No-SQL database, Cassandra is a good choice. It is a popular pick in the IoT, fraud detection applications, recommendation engines, product catalogs and playlists, and messaging applications, providing fast real-time insights.
9 Best MongoDB alternatives in 2019
The Apache Cassandra is an ideal choice for you if you want scalability and high availability without affecting its performance. This MongoDB alternative tool offers support for replicating across multiple datacenters.
Source: www.guru99.com

Automerge Reviews

We have no reviews of Automerge yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Cassandra should be more popular than Automerge. It has been mentiond 44 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Cassandra mentions (44)

  • Why You Shouldn’t Invest In Vector Databases?
    In fact, even in the absence of these commercial databases, users can effortlessly install PostgreSQL and leverage its built-in pgvector functionality for vector search. PostgreSQL stands as the benchmark in the realm of open-source databases, offering comprehensive support across various domains of database management. It excels in transaction processing (e.g., CockroachDB), online analytics (e.g., DuckDB),... - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
  • Data integrity in Ably Pub/Sub
    All messages are persisted durably for two minutes, but Pub/Sub channels can be configured to persist messages for longer periods of time using the persisted messages feature. Persisted messages are additionally written to Cassandra. Multiple copies of the message are stored in a quorum of globally-distributed Cassandra nodes. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Which Database is Perfect for You? A Comprehensive Guide to MySQL, PostgreSQL, NoSQL, and More
    Cassandra is a highly scalable, distributed NoSQL database designed to handle large amounts of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Consistent Hashing: An Overview and Implementation in Golang
    Distributed storage Distributed storage systems like Cassandra, DynamoDB, and Voldemort also use consistent hashing. In these systems, data is partitioned across many servers. Consistent hashing is used to map data to the servers that store the data. When new servers are added or removed, consistent hashing minimizes the amount of data that needs to be remapped to different servers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Understanding SQL vs. NoSQL Databases: A Beginner's Guide
    On the other hand, NoSQL databases are non-relational databases. They store data in flexible, JSON-like documents, key-value pairs, or wide-column stores. Examples include MongoDB, Couchbase, and Cassandra. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Automerge mentions (5)

  • Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (October 2024)
    A sqlite extension that provides a virtual table backed by an Automerge document (https://automerge.org/). I believe that there are plenty of applications that could benefit from the collaboration or sync-ability that CRDTs provide, but that don't need to manage the CRDTs directly. Moving the CRDT management into the database seems like a natural fit. It's very early, and not public anywhere, but I'd be happy to... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Comparing local-first frameworks and approaches
    Ink & Switch released automerge to automatically achieve this merge. If you have two documents you are collaboratively editing, you can use automerge to make concurrent changes. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • 5000x Faster CRDTs
    > The most popular, highly ergonomic, best implementations of CRDTs actually break the academic rules of CRDTs. There's a popular, highly ergonomic implementation called Automerge[0] that would beg to disagree with you. [0]: https://automerge.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Using CRDTs to build collaborative Rust web applications
    If you plan to build production-grade CRDT-based software and don’t want to build every piece of it by hand, I recommend Automerge as a library for handling all your CRDT needs, but it’s always good to look under the hood to build intuition and understanding for the underlying concepts. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Figma Is a File Editor
    Take a look at https://automerge.org/ and the stack those folks are building. You're exactly right that it's a difficult balance (specifically the trick is proving commutativity for the domain-specific data of your application). But automerge (and then https://github.com/inkandswitch/peritext) show it's at least possible. Good stuff. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Cassandra and Automerge, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

PouchDB - Open-source JavaScript database inspired by Apache CouchDB that's designed to run well within the browser

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Yjs - A CRDT framework with a powerful abstraction of shared data, Shared data types for building collaborative software

ArangoDB - A distributed open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values.

DriftDB - GitHub Repo stars