Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Avro VS Apache ZooKeeper

Compare Apache Avro VS Apache ZooKeeper and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache Avro logo Apache Avro

Apache Avro is a comprehensive data serialization system and acting as a source of data exchanger service for Apache Hadoop.

Apache ZooKeeper logo Apache ZooKeeper

Apache ZooKeeper is an effort to develop and maintain an open-source server which enables highly reliable distributed coordination.
  • Apache Avro Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-21
  • Apache ZooKeeper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21

Apache Avro features and specs

  • Schema Evolution
    Avro supports seamless schema evolution, allowing you to add fields and change data types without impacting existing data. This flexibility is advantageous in environments where data structures frequently change.
  • Compact Binary Format
    Avro uses a compact binary format for data serialization, leading to efficient storage and faster data transmission compared to text-based formats like JSON or XML.
  • Language Agnostic
    Avro is designed to be language agnostic, with support for multiple programming languages, including Java, Python, C++, and more. This makes it easier to integrate with various systems.
  • No Code Generation Required
    Unlike other serialization frameworks such as Protocol Buffers and Thrift, Avro does not require generating code from the schema, simplifying the development process.
  • Self Describing
    Each Avro data file contains its schema, making the data self-describing. This helps maintain consistency between data producers and consumers.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Avro

  • Lack of Human Readability
    Avro's binary format is not human-readable, making it challenging to debug or inspect data without specialized tools.
  • Schema Management Overhead
    While Avro supports schema evolution, managing and maintaining these schemas across multiple services can become complex and require additional coordination.
  • Limited Support for Complex Data Types
    Avro has limitations when it comes to the representation of certain complex data types, which might necessitate workarounds or transformations that add complexity.
  • Learning Curve
    Users who are new to Apache Avro may face a learning curve to understand schema creation, evolution, and integration within their data pipelines.
  • Dependency on Schema Registry
    Using Avro effectively often requires integrating with a schema registry, adding an extra layer of infrastructure and potential points of failure.

Apache ZooKeeper features and specs

  • High Availability
    ZooKeeper is designed to be highly available, with built-in redundancy and failover mechanisms that ensure minimal downtime.
  • Consistency
    It follows a strict consistency model, ensuring that reads reflect the most recent writes, which is crucial for coordination and configuration management.
  • Scalability
    ZooKeeper can handle a high number of read operations and can be scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the ensemble.
  • Leader Election
    ZooKeeper simplifies the implementation of leader election processes, making it easier to design fault-tolerant distributed systems.
  • Cluster Management
    It aids in cluster management by providing mechanisms to track the status and configuration of nodes across a distributed system.
  • Watch Mechanism
    ZooKeeper provides a watch mechanism that allows clients to be notified of data changes, helping to keep state synchronized across systems.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ZooKeeper

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing a ZooKeeper ensemble can be complex, requiring careful configuration and maintenance.
  • Resource Intensive
    ZooKeeper can be resource-intensive, requiring significant memory and CPU, especially in large deployments.
  • Write Performance
    While read operations are very fast, write operations can be slower due to the need to achieve consensus among ZooKeeper nodes.
  • Operational Overhead
    Managing ZooKeeper involves operational overhead, including monitoring, backups, and handling node failures.
  • Limited Programming Language Support
    Although ZooKeeper supports many major languages, the client libraries for some languages may not be as mature or well-supported as those for others.
  • Transaction Size
    ZooKeeper is not designed for very large data or complex transactions, limiting its use cases to lightweight coordination tasks.

Apache Avro videos

CCA 175 : Apache Avro Introduction

More videos:

  • Review - End to end Data Governance with Apache Avro and Atlas

Apache ZooKeeper videos

Why do we use Apache Zookeeper?

More videos:

  • Review - 4.5. Apache Zookeeper | Hands-On - Getting Started

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Avro and Apache ZooKeeper)
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
Data Dashboard
100 100%
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Avro and Apache ZooKeeper. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache ZooKeeper should be more popular than Apache Avro. It has been mentiond 32 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Avro mentions (14)

  • Pulumi Gestalt 0.0.1 released
    A schema.json converter for easier ingestion (likely supporting Avro and Protobuf). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Why Data Security is Broken and How to Fix it?
    Security Aware Data Metadata Data schema formats such as Avro and Json currently lack built-in support for data sensitivity or security-aware metadata. Additionally, common formats like Parquet and Iceberg, while efficient for storing large datasets, don’t natively include security-aware metadata. At Jarrid, we are exploring various metadata formats to incorporate data sensitivity and security-aware attributes... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Open Table Formats Such as Apache Iceberg Are Inevitable for Analytical Data
    Apache AVRO [1] is one but it has been largely replaced by Parquet [2] which is a hybrid row/columnar format [1] https://avro.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Generating Avro Schemas from Go types
    The most common format for describing schema in this scenario is Apache Avro. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • gRPC on the client side
    Other serialization alternatives have a schema validation option: e.g., Avro, Kryo and Protocol Buffers. Interestingly enough, gRPC uses Protobuf to offer RPC across distributed components:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

Apache ZooKeeper mentions (32)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Avro and Apache ZooKeeper, you can also consider the following products

Apache Ambari - Ambari is aimed at making Hadoop management simpler by developing software for provisioning, managing, and monitoring Hadoop clusters.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Apache HBase - Apache HBase – Apache HBase™ Home

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Apache Pig - Pig is a high-level platform for creating MapReduce programs used with Hadoop.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.