Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache ActiveMQ VS Tornado

Compare Apache ActiveMQ VS Tornado and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache ActiveMQ logo Apache ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

Tornado logo Tornado

A Python web framework and asynchronous networking library, originally developed at FriendFeed
  • Apache ActiveMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01
  • Tornado Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

Apache ActiveMQ features and specs

  • Open Source
    ActiveMQ is open-source under the Apache License, making it free to use and modify. This can lead to cost savings compared to commercial solutions.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    ActiveMQ supports multiple messaging protocols, including AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, Stomp, and others, allowing for flexible integration with various systems and applications.
  • Java Integration
    Written in Java, ActiveMQ integrates well with JVM-based applications and other Apache projects like Camel and Karaf, making it a good fit for Java-centric environments.
  • High Availability
    Features like broker clustering, network of brokers, and failover support provide robust high availability options, ensuring message delivery even in case of failures.
  • Performance and Scalability
    ActiveMQ can handle a large number of messages and users by scaling horizontally, making it suitable for both small and enterprise-level applications.
  • Admin Console
    ActiveMQ provides a web-based admin console for easy management and monitoring of the message broker, simplifying administrative tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ActiveMQ

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for newcomers. It often requires a steep learning curve to understand all the available options and optimizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    ActiveMQ can be resource-intensive, particularly in high-throughput scenarios, which may necessitate more robust hardware for optimal performance.
  • Latency
    In certain configurations, ActiveMQ may exhibit higher latency compared to other brokers, which might not make it suitable for use cases requiring real-time guarantees.
  • Java Dependency
    As a Java-based solution, ActiveMQ requires the JVM, which can be a downside for organizations that have standardized on other technology stacks.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around ActiveMQ, it may not be as large or as active as those for other, similar open-source projects. This can lead to slower responses to issues and fewer community-based resources.
  • Documentation
    Though comprehensive, the documentation can sometimes be difficult to navigate, making it challenging for users to find specific information quickly.

Tornado features and specs

  • Asynchronous Networking
    Tornado's core is built on non-blocking network I/O, making it suitable for applications that require a high level of concurrency and can benefit from asynchronous networking.
  • WebSockets Support
    Native support for WebSockets allows Tornado to handle real-time web applications, such as live chats or streaming services, more efficiently.
  • Scalability
    Tornado can handle thousands of simultaneous connections, which makes it highly scalable and an excellent choice for applications expecting high traffic volume.
  • Integrated with asyncio
    Tornado is compatible with Python's asyncio library, providing more flexibility in managing asynchronous operations and integration with other modern async Python libraries.
  • Template Engine
    Comes with a built-in template engine, making it easy to build dynamic web pages without needing to integrate additional templating tools.
  • Long-Polling and SSE
    Supports long-polling and Server-Sent Events (SSE), providing more options for real-time data transfer in web applications.

Possible disadvantages of Tornado

  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Requires a good understanding of asynchronous programming and non-blocking I/O, which can be challenging for developers who are accustomed to synchronous paradigms.
  • Smaller Community
    Compared to other frameworks like Django or Flask, Tornado has a smaller community, which may result in fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party plugins.
  • Limited Out-of-the-Box Features
    Tornado is more low-level and does not come with built-in support for many web development features (e.g., authentication, ORM) that are readily available in other frameworks.
  • Performance Overhead
    The performance benefits of Tornado’s asynchronous capabilities are more noticeable in I/O-intensive applications. For CPU-bound tasks, the performance gains may be negligible or require additional libraries for parallel processing.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Older versions of Tornado may have compatibility issues with the latest Python releases or other modern async libraries, necessitating careful version management.
  • Less Beginner-Friendly
    Tornado’s emphasis on low-level control and asynchronous design patterns makes it less beginner-friendly compared to more opinionated, batteries-included frameworks.

Analysis of Apache ActiveMQ

Overall verdict

  • Apache ActiveMQ is generally considered a good choice for message brokering due to its comprehensive feature set, stability, and scalability. It is especially beneficial in environments where integration between different systems and technologies is necessary, thanks to its support of numerous messaging protocols.

Why this product is good

  • Apache ActiveMQ is a popular open-source message broker that is known for its flexibility and reliability. It supports multiple messaging protocols and offers features such as high availability, load balancing, and a robust set of messaging patterns. It is a mature project with a large user base and a supportive community. Its ability to integrate with various platforms and languages, along with its rich feature set, makes it a suitable choice for many applications requiring reliable message queuing.

Recommended for

    Apache ActiveMQ is recommended for enterprises looking for a reliable and scalable message broker, developers needing rich messaging functionality, and organizations that require robust support for various messaging protocols, including JMS, AMQP, STOMP, and MQTT. It is particularly well-suited for applications that need to distribute messages between different applications, languages, and platforms.

Analysis of Tornado

Overall verdict

  • Tornado is a good choice if you need a highly concurrent web framework that's capable of handling a large number of open connections efficiently. It may not be the best choice for traditional web applications where synchronous processing is more prevalent.

Why this product is good

  • Tornado is known for its high performance and ability to handle thousands of simultaneous connections, making it an excellent choice for building high-traffic applications. It is lightweight and designed to efficiently deal with asynchronous operations, which is ideal for real-time web services.

Recommended for

  • Real-time web services
  • Applications with long-lived network connections
  • High-performance applications requiring non-blocking network I/O
  • Websockets-based communication

Apache ActiveMQ videos

No Apache ActiveMQ videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Tornado videos

Review Honda Tornado 250

More videos:

  • Review - Tevo Tornado 2018 edition review: Big volume, big value
  • Review - The Retro51 Tornado Pen: The Full Nick Shabazz Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache ActiveMQ and Tornado)
Data Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
Stream Processing
100 100%
0% 0
Application Server
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache ActiveMQ and Tornado. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache ActiveMQ and Tornado

Apache ActiveMQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
ActiveMQ is a flexible, open-source, multi-protocol messaging broker that supports many protocols. This makes it easy for developers to use a variety of languages and platforms. The AMQP protocol facilitates integration with many applications based on different platforms. However, ActiveMQ’s high-end data accessibility capabilities are complemented by its load balancing,...
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
It is a managed information broker for Apache ActiveMQ which has simple installation and it runs message broker in cloud. It doesn’t need any special look after regular management and maintenance of the message system. It is utilized to send bulk message services.
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Apache ActiveMQ is a popular, open-source, flexible multi-protocol messaging broker. Since it has great support for industry-based protocols, developers get access to languages and platforms. It helps in connecting clients written in languages like Python, C, C++, JavaScript, etc. With the help of the AMQP protocol, integration with many applications with different platforms...

Tornado Reviews

25 Python Frameworks to Master
Tornado is an open-source asynchronous web framework and networking library for building web applications using Python. It was originally developed at FriendFeed, a social media aggregator that was later acquired by Facebook. It’s now widely used in a variety of applications, including web services, real-time analytics, and other high-concurrency applications.
Source: kinsta.com
Exploring 5 Alternatives to Flask in Python for Web Development
Tornado is a scalable web framework in Python that is well-suited for real-time web applications. It provides a non-blocking I/O loop that enables developers to handle thousands of connections at once. Tornado also has support for various third-party plugins and tools that can be easily integrated into the framework. To install Tornado, use the following command:
Source: msalinasc.com
Top 5 Asynchronous Web Frameworks for Python
Tornado has a strong and committed following in the Python community and is used by experienced architects to build highly capable systems. It’s a framework that has long had the answer to the problems of concurrency but perhaps didn’t become mainstream as it doesn’t support the WSGI standard and was too much of a buy-in (remember that the bulk of Python libraries are still...
Source: geekflare.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache ActiveMQ seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache ActiveMQ mentions (7)

View more

Tornado mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Tornado yet. Tracking of Tornado recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache ActiveMQ and Tornado, you can also consider the following products

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows