Antora VS DocFX

You have also AsciiDoctor ( https://asciidoctor.org/ ) which is alive and well. I am using it for technical CS documentation internally, but only for single page documents. I did not try to deploy their whole multi-document setup called Antora ( https://antora.org/ ). - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Well scaffolding an extension also generates a docs module wich leverages Antora, and with a minimal effort, we can produce a nice and clean documentation. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

AsciiDoc has a bit more features compared to Markdown which allows for a richer presentation of the docs. Biggest difference is that Linode has the docs in a separate repository. Not sure if it is a limitation of their toolchain or a deliberate decision. Antora allows you to have the project documentation in the actual project repositories. It then pulls the docs from all the different repos together to build the... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

I've been pushing for Antora everywhere I go. It allows you to keep text-based (AsciiDoc, similar to markdown but an actual standard) documentation with your repositories and from that build a central documentation portal site. Source: about 1 year ago

We use AsciiDoc for our technical documentation, and it's great. Last year we moved from AsciiDoctor to Antora [1] and I can't recommend it enough. [1] https://antora.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

This is a better looking version of what Java and C# have had for a long time (kudos to the author for that!), is that the inspiration for this tool? https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/tools/windows/javadoc.html https://dotnet.github.io/docfx/ I saw the author mentioned in another comment that they found themselves peeping inside type declaration files "too often". While I do often use sites generated... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Actually, we use it for OptiTune, it's called "docfx" https://dotnet.github.io/docfx/. Source: about 2 years ago

We would really prefer to use a somewhat generic pre-made tool for this (such as DocFX) compared to rolling our own solution. We can roll our own solution... But would prefer not to so that we can minimize development and maintenance overhead. Source: over 2 years ago

I use docfx from microsoft to generate documentation for all my oss libraries. Source: over 2 years ago

My best guess would be that there's a CI/CD pipeline in GitHub that utilizes DocFX to convert the Markdown files to HTML. The constructed HTML files are then placed in an Azure Storage account that configured for Static Website Hosting combined with Azure CDN. Source: over 2 years ago