Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Animate.css VS Zdog

Compare Animate.css VS Zdog and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Animate.css logo Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

Zdog logo Zdog

3D javascript engine for canvas and SVG
  • Animate.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06
  • Zdog Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-17

Animate.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Animate.css provides a wide range of preset animations that can be easily implemented by adding class names to HTML elements. This eliminates the need for custom CSS animations or JavaScript, thus saving time and effort.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations in Animate.css work across all modern browsers, ensuring a consistent and reliable experience for users regardless of the browser they use.
  • Open Source
    Animate.css is an open-source library, meaning it's free to use and contributions from the community help keep it updated and improve its functionality over time.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively lightweight, especially if you only include the specific animations you need, which helps keep page load times low.
  • Customizable
    Although it comes with a wide range of preset animations, Animate.css allows for customization. Developers can easily modify the CSS to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Animate.css

  • Limited to CSS Animations
    Animate.css only includes CSS-based animations. For more complex interactions or animations that require JavaScript, another library or custom code would be necessary.
  • Overhead for Unused Animations
    By importing the entire library, you might include many animations that are not used, leading to unnecessary overhead. Selective imports or custom builds are required to avoid this.
  • Performance
    Frequent or complex animations can lead to performance issues, especially on lower-end devices. Developers need to be mindful of how often animations are triggered and their impact on performance.
  • Limited Control
    Using pre-defined animations means less control over specific nuances of the animations. For more intricate or highly customized animations, a more flexible solution may be needed.
  • Potential Conflicts
    There can be potential conflicts with existing CSS in your project, especially if the same class names are used, leading to unintended side effects.

Zdog features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Zdog is designed to be simple and easy to use, making it accessible for beginners in 3D graphic design.
  • Lightweight
    It is a lightweight JavaScript library which ensures faster loading times and smooth performance.
  • 2D Illustration Style
    Zdog allows for the creation of 3D graphics with a charming, hand-drawn 2D illustration style, which is unique and visually appealing.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The library ensures compatibility across different web browsers, broadening its reach and usability.
  • Declarative API
    Zdog uses a declarative API which simplifies the process of creating and managing 3D objects and scenes.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Zdog encourages community contributions and improvements, enhancing the library over time.

Possible disadvantages of Zdog

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive 3D libraries like Three.js, Zdog provides less functionality and fewer features.
  • Performance
    For more complex and resource-intensive 3D graphics, Zdog may exhibit performance issues, making it less suitable for high-end applications.
  • Basic Animation
    While Zdog supports basic animations, it lacks advanced animation capabilities found in more robust libraries.
  • Not Suitable for Complex Projects
    Given its simplicity and focus on 2D illustration style in 3D, Zdog might not be suitable for complex or highly detailed 3D projects.
  • Smaller Community
    As a niche library, Zdog has a smaller community, which means fewer tutorials, resources, and community support compared to larger libraries.

Analysis of Animate.css

Overall verdict

  • Animate.css is generally considered a good tool for adding animations to web projects. It is reliable, simple to use, and widely supported by the development community. However, for highly customized animations or when trying to minimize the performance footprint, custom solutions may be more appropriate.

Why this product is good

  • Animate.css is a well-known library for CSS animations. It is widely used due to its ease of integration, comprehensive collection of animations, and minimal overhead. It allows developers to quickly incorporate animations into their projects without having to write complex CSS from scratch.

Recommended for

  • Web developers looking for quick, easy-to-use animation solutions.
  • Projects that need standard animations with minimal setup.
  • Developers who prefer using established libraries with active community support.
  • Designers who want to add basic animations without deep CSS knowledge.

Analysis of Zdog

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Zdog is a good tool for simple 3D graphics on the web.

Why this product is good

  • Zdog is popular because it is a lightweight 3D engine designed specifically for beginners and web developers who want to incorporate 3D graphics without complex setup. It features a simple, user-friendly API, making it accessible for those who might not have extensive experience with 3D design. Its flexible nature allows for quick prototyping and creation of fun, animated web graphics.

Recommended for

  • Web developers looking for simple 3D graphics solutions
  • Beginners in 3D graphics
  • Designers interested in adding interactive elements to web pages
  • Developers building prototypes with 3D animations

Animate.css videos

No Animate.css videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Zdog videos

A Real Doctor Watches "What The Health" | ZDoggMD.com

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Animate.css and Zdog)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
36 36%
64% 64

User comments

Share your experience with using Animate.css and Zdog. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Zdog should be more popular than Animate.css. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Animate.css mentions (1)

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

Zdog mentions (5)

  • Watching o3 guess a photo's location is surreal, dystopian and entertaining
    Working on extending the [Zdog](https://zzz.dog) library, adding some new types and tooling, patching bugs I run into on the way. All the quirks inherit from it being based on (and rendering to) SVG. SVG is Y-down, Zdog only adds Z-forward. SVG only has layering, so Zdog only z-sorts shapes as wholes. Perspective distortion needs more than dead-simple affine transforms to properly render beziers, so Zdog doesn't... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Creating animated chickens with zdog
    Some time ago I found zdog - it's a lightweight 3D javascript engine, for canvas or SVG. If you check out its site, you'll see it described as pseudo 3D. What does that mean? Basically zdog holds a model of 3D shapes, but renders everything as 2D flat shapes. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • I'm wanting to get into 2D animation. What are the best tools on linux?
    For some reason could not paste more links into my last comment so here are some other thoughts on things to do too. Zdog: Https://zzz.dog/ This one is a way to do vector pseudo 3d illustrations on the web, but it mostly just has a simple rotation not much beyond that. Source: over 2 years ago
  • [Hobby] UX, math, and art people for "simple" 3D editor
    Hi, I am trying to make a 3D editor for the Zdog library. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Tips on writing a functional wrapper for a mutable/OOP library?
    For this project, I'm tinkering with ZDog (https://zzz.dog/) a nifty little flat-shaded pseudo-3d engine for the browser, written in Javascript. It's pretty simple as 3d engines go, but as one might expect, it's heavily structured around OOP and mutable objects, and makes extensive use of Javascript prototypal inheritance. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Animate.css and Zdog, you can also consider the following products

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Pixi.js - Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences