Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Animate.css VS Tailwind Box Shadows

Compare Animate.css VS Tailwind Box Shadows and see what are their differences

Animate.css logo Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

Tailwind Box Shadows logo Tailwind Box Shadows

A curated list of box shadows for your next web project.
  • Animate.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06
  • Tailwind Box Shadows Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

Animate.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Animate.css provides a wide range of preset animations that can be easily implemented by adding class names to HTML elements. This eliminates the need for custom CSS animations or JavaScript, thus saving time and effort.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations in Animate.css work across all modern browsers, ensuring a consistent and reliable experience for users regardless of the browser they use.
  • Open Source
    Animate.css is an open-source library, meaning it's free to use and contributions from the community help keep it updated and improve its functionality over time.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively lightweight, especially if you only include the specific animations you need, which helps keep page load times low.
  • Customizable
    Although it comes with a wide range of preset animations, Animate.css allows for customization. Developers can easily modify the CSS to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Animate.css

  • Limited to CSS Animations
    Animate.css only includes CSS-based animations. For more complex interactions or animations that require JavaScript, another library or custom code would be necessary.
  • Overhead for Unused Animations
    By importing the entire library, you might include many animations that are not used, leading to unnecessary overhead. Selective imports or custom builds are required to avoid this.
  • Performance
    Frequent or complex animations can lead to performance issues, especially on lower-end devices. Developers need to be mindful of how often animations are triggered and their impact on performance.
  • Limited Control
    Using pre-defined animations means less control over specific nuances of the animations. For more intricate or highly customized animations, a more flexible solution may be needed.
  • Potential Conflicts
    There can be potential conflicts with existing CSS in your project, especially if the same class names are used, leading to unintended side effects.

Tailwind Box Shadows features and specs

  • Consistency
    Tailwind CSS provides predefined utility classes for box shadows, ensuring consistent styling across different components and projects.
  • Customization
    Although Tailwind has predefined shadows, it allows for customization, enabling developers to create unique shadow effects while maintaining a consistent base style.
  • Speed
    Using utility classes like Tailwind’s box shadow classes can speed up development, as it reduces the need to write custom CSS from scratch.
  • Responsive Design
    These classes can be combined with Tailwind’s responsive modifiers, making it easy to use different shadow styles for different screen sizes.
  • Maintainability
    By using standardized utility classes, maintenance is simplified as changes to design requirements can be made by adjusting or adding classes rather than overhauling CSS.

Possible disadvantages of Tailwind Box Shadows

  • Learning Curve
    Developers new to Tailwind might face a learning curve, as understanding and remembering utility classes is essential.
  • Verbose HTML
    Using utility classes like those for box shadows can lead to verbose HTML with many classes, which some developers find difficult to read and maintain.
  • Limited Predefined Options
    The predefined shadow styles may not meet all design requirements out of the box, necessitating custom extensions that can decrease the value of using a utility-first CSS framework.
  • Design Consistency
    While consistency is a pro, it can also be a con if the design requires significant deviation from the predefined options, potentially leading to inconsistent styling practices.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Animate.css and Tailwind Box Shadows)
Design Tools
65 65%
35% 35
Developer Tools
68 68%
32% 32
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Animate.css and Tailwind Box Shadows. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Animate.css seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Animate.css mentions (1)

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

Tailwind Box Shadows mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Tailwind Box Shadows yet. Tracking of Tailwind Box Shadows recommendations started around Jan 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Animate.css and Tailwind Box Shadows, you can also consider the following products

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Glass UI Generator - CSS generator for glassmorphism

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Neumorphism UI - Neumorphism inspired UI web components, sections and pages

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

Clippy - CSS Clip-path Maker - Drag and points to generate clip-path CSS