Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Animate.css VS Buefy

Compare Animate.css VS Buefy and see what are their differences

Animate.css logo Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

Buefy logo Buefy

Lightweight UI components for Vue.js based on Bulma
  • Animate.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06
  • Buefy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-11

Animate.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Animate.css provides a wide range of preset animations that can be easily implemented by adding class names to HTML elements. This eliminates the need for custom CSS animations or JavaScript, thus saving time and effort.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations in Animate.css work across all modern browsers, ensuring a consistent and reliable experience for users regardless of the browser they use.
  • Open Source
    Animate.css is an open-source library, meaning it's free to use and contributions from the community help keep it updated and improve its functionality over time.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively lightweight, especially if you only include the specific animations you need, which helps keep page load times low.
  • Customizable
    Although it comes with a wide range of preset animations, Animate.css allows for customization. Developers can easily modify the CSS to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Animate.css

  • Limited to CSS Animations
    Animate.css only includes CSS-based animations. For more complex interactions or animations that require JavaScript, another library or custom code would be necessary.
  • Overhead for Unused Animations
    By importing the entire library, you might include many animations that are not used, leading to unnecessary overhead. Selective imports or custom builds are required to avoid this.
  • Performance
    Frequent or complex animations can lead to performance issues, especially on lower-end devices. Developers need to be mindful of how often animations are triggered and their impact on performance.
  • Limited Control
    Using pre-defined animations means less control over specific nuances of the animations. For more intricate or highly customized animations, a more flexible solution may be needed.
  • Potential Conflicts
    There can be potential conflicts with existing CSS in your project, especially if the same class names are used, leading to unintended side effects.

Buefy features and specs

  • Integration
    Buefy is designed to work seamlessly with Vue.js, making it easy to integrate into existing Vue projects.
  • Bulma Based
    Buefy uses Bulma, a lightweight and flexible CSS framework, which ensures a modern and clean user interface.
  • Lightweight
    Since Buefy leverages Bulma for style and Vue.js for functionality, it remains lightweight compared to full-blown UI frameworks.
  • Simple to Use
    Buefy's components are user-friendly and easy to implement, allowing for rapid development and prototyping.
  • Customizable
    It offers a fair amount of customization options, allowing developers to tweak components to meet specific requirements.
  • Modular
    You can import only the components you need, optimizing your application's performance.

Possible disadvantages of Buefy

  • Limited Components
    Compared to other UI frameworks, Buefy has a smaller set of components, which may limit its use in more complex applications.
  • Community Support
    While Buefy has a growing community, it is still smaller than more established frameworks, which can impact the availability of shared resources and third-party plugins.
  • Documentation
    The documentation, while generally good, can sometimes lack depth in certain areas, making it harder to find advanced usage examples.
  • Dependent on Bulma
    Since Buefy is built on top of Bulma, any limitations or issues in Bulma will also affect Buefy.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    Buefy's updates and releases are less frequent compared to larger frameworks, which may result in slower bug fixes and feature additions.
  • Not Suitable for Large Scale Projects
    While excellent for small to medium projects, Buefy might not offer all the necessary features for very large and complex enterprise-level applications.

Animate.css videos

No Animate.css videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Buefy videos

#Vue + #Buefy Crash Course

More videos:

  • Review - NUXT.JS UI COMPONENT LIBRARIES WITH BUEFY AND ANT

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Animate.css and Buefy)
Design Tools
54 54%
46% 46
Developer Tools
40 40%
60% 60
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Animate.css and Buefy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Animate.css and Buefy

Animate.css Reviews

We have no reviews of Animate.css yet.
Be the first one to post

Buefy Reviews

14 Best Vue UI Component Libraries 2023
If you’ve used Bulma, a CSS framework used by over 200.000 developers, then Buefy may be a great choice for you. Buefy combines Bulma with Vue, helping you build good-looking applications using minimal code. Even though the default version has a distinct look and feel, the framework is highly customizable. You can define your own brand colors, sizing rules, and more, making...
Source: athemes.com
15 of the Most Interesting Vue UI Component Libraries for 2023
If you are comfortable with SASS, you will feel right at home with Buefy’s similarities with SASS. That being said, while Buefy provides a ready-made list of components to use for a beginner application, you may find it insufficient if working on a large project.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buefy seems to be a lot more popular than Animate.css. While we know about 13 links to Buefy, we've tracked only 1 mention of Animate.css. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Animate.css mentions (1)

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

Buefy mentions (13)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Animate.css and Buefy, you can also consider the following products

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Vuetify - Material Component Framework for VueJS 2

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Bootstrap Vue - Quickly integrate Bootstrap v4 components with Vue.js

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Mint UI - Beautiful, reliable component library for Mint