Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Animate.css VS AniJS

Compare Animate.css VS AniJS and see what are their differences

Animate.css logo Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

AniJS logo AniJS

A Library to Raise your Web Design without Coding.
  • Animate.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06
  • AniJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-09

Animate.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Animate.css provides a wide range of preset animations that can be easily implemented by adding class names to HTML elements. This eliminates the need for custom CSS animations or JavaScript, thus saving time and effort.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations in Animate.css work across all modern browsers, ensuring a consistent and reliable experience for users regardless of the browser they use.
  • Open Source
    Animate.css is an open-source library, meaning it's free to use and contributions from the community help keep it updated and improve its functionality over time.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively lightweight, especially if you only include the specific animations you need, which helps keep page load times low.
  • Customizable
    Although it comes with a wide range of preset animations, Animate.css allows for customization. Developers can easily modify the CSS to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Animate.css

  • Limited to CSS Animations
    Animate.css only includes CSS-based animations. For more complex interactions or animations that require JavaScript, another library or custom code would be necessary.
  • Overhead for Unused Animations
    By importing the entire library, you might include many animations that are not used, leading to unnecessary overhead. Selective imports or custom builds are required to avoid this.
  • Performance
    Frequent or complex animations can lead to performance issues, especially on lower-end devices. Developers need to be mindful of how often animations are triggered and their impact on performance.
  • Limited Control
    Using pre-defined animations means less control over specific nuances of the animations. For more intricate or highly customized animations, a more flexible solution may be needed.
  • Potential Conflicts
    There can be potential conflicts with existing CSS in your project, especially if the same class names are used, leading to unintended side effects.

AniJS features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    AniJS allows developers to add animations to their websites without writing complex JavaScript code. It uses a simple HTML attribute model which makes it easy to implement for those with limited JavaScript knowledge.
  • Declarative Syntax
    The library employs a declarative approach to animation, making it intuitive to specify animations directly in HTML elements via attributes, enhancing readability and simplicity.
  • Size and Performance
    AniJS is lightweight, making it a good option for projects where minimizing the size of the JavaScript bundle is important for performance reasons.
  • Flexibility
    Support for various animations by simply changing attribute values allows for a wide range of animations without additional configurations.
  • Framework Agnostic
    AniJS can be used with any front-end framework or library, allowing developers to integrate it into a variety of projects without dependencies.

Possible disadvantages of AniJS

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While AniJS is perfect for simple to moderate animations, it might lack advanced features needed for more complex animation sequences or state management.
  • Learning Curve
    Beginners might need time to get accustomed to the attribute-driven animation settings, especially those new to the concept of declarative syntax.
  • Community and Support
    AniJS may not have as large a community or extensive support as other more popular animation libraries, potentially leading to challenges in troubleshooting uncommon issues.
  • Customization Limitations
    Harder to implement highly customized animations which might require a fallback to traditional JavaScript or CSS for intricate animations.
  • Dependency on CSS
    As AniJS mainly depends on CSS for animation functionality, it might not be as powerful in scenarios where JavaScript-based animations are required.

Animate.css videos

No Animate.css videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

AniJS videos

Frank body SHIMMER SCRUB? Review & first impression | Sabrina Anijs

More videos:

  • Review - MAC SNOWBALL HOLIDAY COLLECTION 2017 | swatches & review | Sabrina Anijs
  • Review - Quick & easy sunset inspired eye makeup | Half cut crease| Sabrina Anijs

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Animate.css and AniJS)
Design Tools
75 75%
25% 25
Developer Tools
71 71%
29% 29
Javascript UI Libraries
56 56%
44% 44
Application And Data
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Animate.css and AniJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AniJS should be more popular than Animate.css. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Animate.css mentions (1)

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

AniJS mentions (2)

  • 100+ FREE Resources Every Web Developer Must Try
    JavaScript Animation Libraries 🔥 . Anime.js: Lightweight JavaScript animation library. . ScrollReveal.js: Easily reveal elements as they enter the viewport. . Popmotion: A functional, flexible JavaScript motion library. . AniJS: Declarative handling library for CSS animations. . Wow.js: Reveal CSS animation as you scroll down a page. . Typed.js: A JavaScript library that types. . Velocity.js: Accelerated... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • 100+ FREE Resources Every Web Developer Must Try
    AniJS: Declarative handling library for CSS animations. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Animate.css and AniJS, you can also consider the following products

Material UI - A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

GSAP - GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform) is a suite of JavaScript tools for high-performance animations that work in all major browsers.

vov.css - A small class-based animation library consisting of small but useful animations.

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design