Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Anima App VS react-testing-library

Compare Anima App VS react-testing-library and see what are their differences

Promptaa
Prompt organization and AI enhancement. Engineer prompts with 1 click. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Anima App logo Anima App

Design, get feedback, convert to code, publish, iterate.

react-testing-library logo react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding
  • Anima App Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-19

Create High-Fidelity Prototypes in Figma, Adobe XD and Sketch. Convert your designs into HTML, CSS and React Use open source react components straight from Figma

  • react-testing-library Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-21

Anima App features and specs

  • High-Fidelity Prototypes
    Anima allows for the creation of high-fidelity prototypes that are almost indistinguishable from the final product, providing a more accurate representation of the end-user experience.
  • Code Export
    It provides the ability to export HTML, CSS, and React code directly from the design, which can significantly speed up the development process by bridging the gap between designers and developers.
  • Design-to-Code Workflow
    Anima automates the conversion of design files into code, which helps in maintaining design consistency and reducing manual coding errors.
  • Collaboration Tools
    The platform supports collaborative features that allow designers and developers to work together seamlessly, improving communication and project management.
  • Responsive Design
    Anima includes features for creating responsive designs that adapt to different screen sizes, which is crucial for modern web development.

Possible disadvantages of Anima App

  • Learning Curve
    New users may find the tool complex and may need some time to fully understand and leverage all its features.
  • Limitations in Custom Code
    While the code export is helpful, it might not cover all custom design needs, necessitating additional manual coding.
  • Pricing
    The app can be relatively expensive, especially for small teams or individual freelancers, potentially limiting its accessibility.
  • Browser Compatibility
    There can be issues with browser compatibility, meaning that how designs appear in Anima may vary slightly from how they render in different web browsers.
  • Dependency on Design Tools
    Anima heavily relies on integration with specific design tools like Figma, Sketch, and Adobe XD, which could be a limitation for teams using other design software.

react-testing-library features and specs

  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages of react-testing-library

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

Analysis of Anima App

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Anima App is a valuable tool for teams that aim to enhance collaboration between designers and developers. Its real merit lies in its ability to save time and reduce errors during the design handoff process. While some advanced customization might still require manual coding, the platform greatly improves workflow efficiency for most standard projects. Users generally find it to be a worthwhile investment, especially for teams working in web design and development.

Why this product is good

  • Anima App is considered good by many users due to its ability to streamline the design-to-development process. It allows designers to convert their Figma, Adobe XD, and Sketch designs into developer-friendly HTML, React, or Vue code, which can significantly reduce the handoff time between design and development teams. The app is praised for its ease of use, efficiency, and the ability to maintain design precision during the conversion process. Additionally, it supports real-time design updates and automatic code generation, making it a powerful tool for rapid prototyping and iterative design workflows.

Recommended for

  • Designers and developers looking for a smoother handoff process.
  • Teams using Figma, Adobe XD, or Sketch for design.
  • Projects that require rapid prototyping and frequent iterations.
  • Organizations aiming to bridge the gap between their design and development teams.

Analysis of react-testing-library

Overall verdict

  • React Testing Library is highly regarded in the React community for its simplicity and effective approach to testing React components. It’s known for promoting good testing practices that result in reliable and maintainable code.

Why this product is good

  • React Testing Library is considered good because it encourages testing practices that closely resemble how users interact with the application. It emphasizes testing components from the user's perspective and discourages testing implementation details, which can lead to more robust and maintainable tests.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to improve the reliability of their React applications
  • Teams interested in adopting user-centric testing methodologies
  • Projects that prioritize maintainable and understandable test code

Anima App videos

+ Add

I transform designs into React code with Anima

More videos:

  • Review - From Design to Code with Anima | What is Anima?
  • Review - Convert Web Design To Real Website Prototype FAST (HTML & CSS)
  • Tutorial - Convert Figma to HTML Automatically with Anima
  • Tutorial - Adobe XD to HTML CSS Automatically | Anima App
  • Tutorial - How to host, add a custom domain and publish your website with Anima
  • Tutorial - Figma to React: Building a bank app using Ant + Strapi CMS as backend | Anima App

react-testing-library videos

+ Add

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos:

  • Review - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Anima App and react-testing-library)

Anima App

react-testing-library

Design Tools
100 100%
Design Tools
0% 0
Developer Tools
41 41%
Developer Tools
59% 59
Design Collaboration
100 100%
Design Collaboration
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
Automated Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Anima App and react-testing-library. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, react-testing-library seems to be a lot more popular than Anima App. While we know about 133 links to react-testing-library, we've tracked only 6 mentions of Anima App. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Anima App mentions (6)

  • Figma to React instantly: Introduction Anima app
    You will need to log in/sign up on the Anima app website and to use the figma plugin. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Wordpress to React
    There will be more solutions in the future, currently animaapp.com does figma/adobeXD to React code, also uizard.io does image to design (figma like but I think they do not support Figma). However I supose OP did not have Figma files for the work done. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Image to Code
    There are many not recently launched. animaapp.com and https://www.copycat.dev/product does figma to react code there are some others but idk how good in the figma plugin marketplace. These are just based on figma API. Source: about 2 years ago
  • I'm building a scaffolding tool that works this way: you define just the data models/ database and it generates in one command GraphQL API, admin interface and custom React hooks for list, create, edit views. Should it be a CLI or VSCode plugin?
    Is it would be similar. Only onusegenerated.com I provide the react hooks hooks(data fetching) and you need to use another solution like animaapp.com or something to get the react components as well, and manually connect the hooks to the React presentational components. On the backend however with a NestJs and Prisma app I might get a more robust solution I guess. Source: over 2 years ago
  • You're looking at an automatically-generated Figma component that was generated (automatically, I repeat) from Storybook using Anima. Oh, and it's responsive with Figma's native auto layout.
    Me again! We (animaapp.com) worked on this one for quite some time - we sync Storybook and Figma to create a single source of truth. Or in other words - it turns your storybook into a Figma library in a single click. If you're intrigued - join the beta! https://form.typeform.com/to/eNOueDoh. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

react-testing-library mentions (133)

  • Migrating from AngularJS to React
    Additionally, I wrote Jest and Enzyme unit tests to demonstrate how to go about unit testing the components, as test driven development (TDD) is another methodology my organization subscribes to. Jest is a unit testing framework that actually shipped with React if you use the Create React App CLI to make a new React project. And at the time, Enzyme was created by Airbnb and added additional functionality to Jest... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How To Convert HTML CSS JS To React JS
    After converting your components, take some time to test your application. Make sure everything is working as expected. React’s development server automatically reloads your application whenever you save changes, which makes testing a lot easier. Tools like Jest and React Testing Library are also available to help you write tests for your components. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How To Write Unit Test Cases In React JS
    React Testing Library: For testing React components from a user’s point of view, visit the React Testing Library documentation. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Top 20 Modern React Libraries To Supercharge Your Next Big Project
    Resource: React Testing Library Documentation. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Next.js Testing Guide: Unit and E2E Tests with Vitest & Playwright
    In this article, you will write unit tests in Next.js client components and synchronous server components using Vitest and React Testing Library, and you will write end-to-end tests for your async server components using Playwright. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Anima App and react-testing-library, you can also consider the following products

Framer - 🔥 Design real websites right on the canvas.

Jest - Jest is a delightful JavaScript Testing Framework with a focus on simplicity.

Locofy.ai - Locofy.ai helps builders launch 4-5x faster by converting designs to production ready code.

Enzyme - Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility for React.

Auto-Layout for Sketch - Responsive design for Sketch

Vitest - A blazing fast unit test framework powered by Vite

Loading...