Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Anchor CMS VS Hugo

Compare Anchor CMS VS Hugo and see what are their differences

Anchor CMS logo Anchor CMS

Free and lightweight blogging system

Hugo logo Hugo

Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
  • Anchor CMS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18
  • Hugo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21

Anchor CMS videos

No Anchor CMS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Hugo videos

Hugo - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann

More videos:

  • Review - Hugo - A Love Letter to Cinema
  • Review - Hugo Review (funny movie review)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Anchor CMS and Hugo)
CMS
23 23%
77% 77
Blogging
10 10%
90% 90
Blogging Platform
25 25%
75% 75
Static Site Generators
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Anchor CMS and Hugo. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Anchor CMS and Hugo

Anchor CMS Reviews

We have no reviews of Anchor CMS yet.
Be the first one to post

Hugo Reviews

10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Hugo does something similar with its menu templates. You can define menu links in your Hugo site config, and even add useful properties that Hugo understands, like weighting. Here’s a definition of the menu above in config.yaml:
Top Static Site Generators For 2019
Hugo is a static site generator which is also very popular which is proven by over 30,000 stars on GitHub right now. Hugo is based on the Go programming language which is great if you have already gained some knowledge of Go. Hugo claims that it is the fastest framework for building websites. In fact Hugo comes with an ultra-fast build process and makes building static...
Source: medium.com
Hugo or Jekyll? 6 Factors You Should Know
Hugo is blazingly fast. We previously released a post on the performance of Hugo and Jekyll and compared the two. Hugo was the clear winner.
Source: forestry.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hugo seems to be a lot more popular than Anchor CMS. While we know about 354 links to Hugo, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Anchor CMS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Anchor CMS mentions (2)

  • No input file specified
    I'm running Anchor CMS and I just upgraded to version 0.8. When I try and run the installer I get a 'No input file specified' error. I believe it's more than likely a .htaccess problem but I'm not sure what the correct settings should be. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Suitable platform for an art gallery
    Nothing wrong with using WP as the platform for this. Alternatively you could try ClassicPress, Ghost or even Anchor. Source: about 3 years ago

Hugo mentions (354)

  • Building static websites
    At one point though I realized there is a scaling problem with my build minutes. I knew that golang has considerably faster builds and in my case the easy fix is swapping over to Hugo. - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
  • Creating excerpts in Astro
    This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview
    We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation
    In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Top 5 Open-Source Documentation Development Platforms of 2024
    Hugo is a popular static site generator specifically designed to create websites and documentation lightning-fast. Its minimalist approach, emphasis on speed, and ease of use have made it popular among developers, technical writers, and anybody looking to construct high-quality websites without the complexity of typical CMS platforms. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Anchor CMS and Hugo, you can also consider the following products

Sitecake - Drag and drop CMS for HTML websites. It's flat file CMS so it's pretty fast.

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

ClassicPress - The WordPress fork. No Gutenberg. Great future!

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Textpattern - Textpattern is an elegant content management system that is free, open source software.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.