Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Amazon SQS VS PushApps

Compare Amazon SQS VS PushApps and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Amazon SQS logo Amazon SQS

Amazon Simple Queue Service is a fully managed message queuing service.

PushApps logo PushApps

Top performance, Low cost, Reliable Push Notifications service. PushApps is for everyone!
  • Amazon SQS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-22
  • PushApps Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-04

Amazon SQS features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon SQS scales automatically to handle an unlimited number of messages, ensuring that your application can support any level of demand without manual intervention.
  • Reliability
    Amazon SQS offers guaranteed delivery of messages, with multiple copies of each message stored redundantly across multiple servers and data centers.
  • Flexibility
    SQS supports both standard and FIFO (First In, First Out) queues, giving you the option to choose the type of queue that best suits your application's requirements.
  • Ease of Use
    Amazon SQS is fully managed, meaning you don't need to worry about provisioning or managing infrastructure. Integration is straightforward with a well-documented API.
  • Cost-Effective
    SQS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you only pay for the number of calls made to the API and the amount of data transferred, making it a cost-effective solution for many use cases.
  • Security
    SQS integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to control access. Additionally, it supports encryption of messages in transit and at rest, enhancing security.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon SQS

  • Message Limitation
    Each SQS message can body can be up to 256 KB in size during one API call, which might be restrictive for certain applications that require larger message payloads.
  • Latency
    Though generally fast, there can be latency in message delivery, especially when compared to more direct communication methods like WebSocket or gRPC.
  • Complexity in Handling Large Number of Messages
    While SQS can handle a large number of messages, managing a very high throughput can become complex, requiring careful configuration of multiple queues, message batching, and appropriate back-off and retry logic.
  • Cost for High Volume
    While cost-effective for many scenarios, SQS costs can increase significantly with very high volumes of messages due to the per-request pricing, potentially necessitating budget management.
  • Limited Ordering Guarantees
    Standard queues do not ensure the order of message processing. While FIFO queues provide ordering, they come with limitations in terms of throughput and additional costs.
  • Visibility Timeout
    Incorrectly setting the visibility timeout can result in duplicated message processing or delayed message processing, requiring careful consideration and configuration based on the application's characteristics.

PushApps features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of Amazon SQS

Overall verdict

  • Amazon SQS is a robust and versatile messaging service that is well-suited for a wide range of use cases. Its scalability, reliability, and tight integration with other AWS services make it a strong choice for both small and large applications.

Why this product is good

  • Ease of use
    With integration into the AWS ecosystem, SQS is easy to set up, manage, and integrate with other AWS services.
  • Flexibility
    SQS supports both standard queues and FIFO queues, which cater to different use cases depending on whether message order is important.
  • Reliability
    It provides guaranteed message delivery due to its redundant, distributed architecture.
  • Scalability
    Amazon SQS is highly scalable, allowing businesses to handle a large number of messages as their workload increases.
  • Cost effectiveness
    It offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, making it cost-effective for businesses of all sizes.

Recommended for

    {"businesses" => "Businesses of any size looking for an efficient and cost-effective message queuing service.", "developers" => "Developers who need scalable and reliable messaging without managing underlying infrastructure.", "applications" => "Applications requiring asynchronous processing or decoupled architecture."}

Amazon SQS videos

+ Add

Speed and Reliability at Any Scale: Amazon SQS and Database Services (SVC206) | AWS re:Invent 2013

PushApps videos

No PushApps videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Amazon SQS and PushApps)

Amazon SQS

PushApps

Data Integration
100 100%
Data Integration
0% 0
Web Push Notifications
0 0%
Web Push Notifications
100% 100
Stream Processing
100 100%
Stream Processing
0% 0
Push Notifications
0 0%
Push Notifications
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Amazon SQS and PushApps. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Amazon SQS and PushApps

Amazon SQS Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
Amazon SQS offers standard features such as dead-letter queues and costs allocation tags. With Amazon SQS, you can access the web services API in any programming language that supports the AWS SDK.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Amazon SQS (Simple Queue Service) is a fully managed, message queuing service for distributed systems, serverless applications, and microservices. It is known for the dissociation of components and the creation of effective asynchronous processes. It possesses a good SKD and a useful console. Because of its salient features, it is easy to use and hence favored by developers.
Source: www.spec-india.com

PushApps Reviews

We have no reviews of PushApps yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon SQS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 72 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Amazon SQS mentions (72)

View more

PushApps mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PushApps yet. Tracking of PushApps recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Amazon SQS and PushApps, you can also consider the following products

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

OneSignal - Customer engagement platform used by over 1 million developers and marketers; the fastest and most reliable way to send mobile and web push notifications, in-app messages, emails, and SMS.

Amazon SNS - Fully managed pub/sub messaging for microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications

PushEngage - Personalized Browser Push Notifications.

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

PushCrew - Push Notifications for Websites

Loading...