Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Amazon RDS VS Amazon Elastic File System

Compare Amazon RDS VS Amazon Elastic File System and see what are their differences

Hive
Seamless project management and collaboration for your team. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Amazon RDS logo Amazon RDS

Easy to manage relational databases optimized for total cost of ownership.

Amazon Elastic File System logo Amazon Elastic File System

Amazon Elastic File System is a cloud-native and serverless data store that provides simple saleable elastic shared file storage for Linux-based business applications.
  • Amazon RDS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-18
  • Amazon Elastic File System Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-05

Amazon RDS features and specs

  • Managed Service
    Amazon RDS takes care of routine database tasks such as backups, patch management, and scalability, reducing the operational burden on users.
  • Scalability
    Easily scale your database's compute and storage resources with a few clicks or automatically with Amazon RDS Auto Scaling.
  • High Availability
    Amazon RDS provides Multi-AZ deployments for disaster recovery and automated backups, ensuring high availability and durability.
  • Security
    Integrated with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), Amazon RDS offers encryption at rest and in transit, as well as network isolation using Amazon VPC.
  • Performance Monitoring
    Amazon RDS provides built-in performance monitoring tools such as Amazon CloudWatch for tracking key metrics and identifying issues.
  • Compatibility
    Supports multiple database engines including MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, Oracle, and SQL Server, offering flexibility based on your requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon RDS

  • Cost
    The cost of using Amazon RDS can accumulate quickly, especially with high storage demands, high availability configurations, and extensive data transfer.
  • Limited Customization
    As a managed service, there are limits to the customization and fine-tuning compared to self-managed databases, which might not meet all specialized needs.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Reliance on Amazon RDS ties you into the AWS ecosystem, making migration to another cloud provider or on-premise environment more challenging.
  • Performance Variability
    While generally reliable, users may sometimes experience variability in performance due to shared cloud infrastructure.
  • Configuration Restrictions
    Certain database configurations and features available in on-premise setups might not be supported or might have limited support in Amazon RDS.
  • Complexity in Hybrid Environments
    Integrating Amazon RDS with on-premise systems or other cloud providers can be complex and might require additional configuration and management.

Amazon Elastic File System features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon EFS automatically scales your file system storage capacity up or down as you add or remove files, which helps meet varying workload demands without the need for manual intervention.
  • Managed Service
    As a fully managed service, Amazon EFS handles storage infrastructure management tasks such as hardware provisioning, patching, and performance tuning, enabling users to focus on application development.
  • Elasticity
    Amazon EFS provides elastic storage capacity, so you only pay for the storage you use, which can result in cost savings and greater efficiency compared to traditional file systems.
  • Multi-AZ Resilience
    Amazon EFS is designed to be highly-available and resilient with data redundantly stored across multiple Availability Zones, ensuring durability and availability of critical workloads.
  • POSIX-Compliant
    EFS offers a POSIX-compliant file system which makes it compatible with a wide range of legacy and modern applications, easing integration and migration processes.
  • Integration with AWS Services
    It seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as EC2, ECS, and Lambda, providing users with a cohesive and comprehensive cloud ecosystem for building and deploying applications.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon Elastic File System

  • Higher Latency
    Compared to other storage services like EBS, Amazon EFS might exhibit higher latency due to its network file system nature, potentially impacting performance-sensitive applications.
  • Cost
    Amazon EFS can be more expensive than alternatives like Amazon S3 or EBS, especially for workloads with lower IOPS requirements, due to its pricing model based on storage and access.
  • Consistency Model
    While EFS offers eventual consistency for write operations from multiple connections, this can lead to potential data visibility issues if not managed carefully in concurrent write scenarios.
  • Mount Targets Limitation
    Each Amazon EFS file system can have a limited number of mount targets per VPC, potentially restricting its usability for environments with a large number of instances across multiple subnets.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Amazon EFS is primarily designed for Linux-based workloads, which can pose challenges or require additional configurations when used with Windows-based applications.

Amazon RDS videos

+ Add

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS)

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with Amazon RDS - Relational Database Service on AWS

Amazon Elastic File System videos

+ Add

AWS EFS Tutorial | Amazon Elastic File System | AWS Storage Services | AWS Training | Edureka

More videos:

  • Review - What's New with Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Amazon RDS and Amazon Elastic File System)

Amazon RDS

Amazon Elastic File System

Databases
100 100%
Databases
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
NoSQL Databases
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
Project Management
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Amazon RDS and Amazon Elastic File System. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon RDS should be more popular than Amazon Elastic File System. It has been mentiond 72 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Amazon RDS mentions (72)

View more

Amazon Elastic File System mentions (25)

  • Get Started with Serverless Architectures: Top Tools You Need to Know
    AWS Lambda AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your backend code in response to events such as object uploads and HTTP requests. It automatically handles all the capacity, patching, scaling, and administration of the infrastructure to run your AWS Lambda functions. Lambda also provides visibility and performance and automatically manages the computing resources, making it easy to build applications that... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • ⚡🦀 Deploy a blazing-fast & Lightweight LLM app with Rust-Rig-LanceDB
    LanceDB's underlying optimized storage format, lance, is flexible enough to be supported by various storage backends, such as local NVMe, EBS, EFS, S3 and other third-party APIs that connect to the cloud. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Mount Up! A Step-by-Step Guide to Creating and Using Amazon EFS on Ubuntu
    Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides a simple, scalable, and fully managed Network File System for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. This guide will walk you through the process of creating an EFS, mounting it on an Ubuntu instance, and adding files to it. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Mastering AWS: Deploying a Complex Three-Tier Architecture for Production
    AWS EFS is a managed shared storage solution in the cloud that is compatible with NFS. In our three-tier architecture, it sits in the data layer and provides shared storage for the application tier servers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Building a Serverless AI Content Detector
    But that didn't work quite so well. Between some issues with the packages, and the amount of time it took to unzip... It just wasn't worth it. So I refactored back into using EFS to host the packages and model files. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Amazon RDS and Amazon Elastic File System, you can also consider the following products

MariaDB - An enhanced, drop-in replacement for MySQL

Azure File Storage - Try Azure File Storage for managed file shares that use standard SMB 3.0 protocol. Share data with on-premises and cloud servers, integrate with apps, and more.

Microsoft SQL Server - Microsoft Azure is an open, flexible, enterprise-grade cloud computing platform. Move faster, do more, and save money with IaaS + PaaS. Try for FREE.

Cyberduck - A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.

MySQL - The world's most popular open source database

Google Cloud Filestore - Fully-managed cloud file storage

Loading...