Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Microsoft SQL Server VS Amazon Elastic File System

Compare Microsoft SQL Server VS Amazon Elastic File System and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Microsoft SQL Server logo Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft Azure is an open, flexible, enterprise-grade cloud computing platform. Move faster, do more, and save money with IaaS + PaaS. Try for FREE.

Amazon Elastic File System logo Amazon Elastic File System

Amazon Elastic File System is a cloud-native and serverless data store that provides simple saleable elastic shared file storage for Linux-based business applications.
  • Microsoft SQL Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-17
  • Amazon Elastic File System Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-05

Microsoft SQL Server features and specs

  • Performance
    Microsoft SQL Server offers high performance and efficient database management capabilities, optimized for both OLTP (Online Transaction Processing) and OLAP (Online Analytical Processing).
  • Security Features
    SQL Server comes with advanced security features such as encryption, data masking, and advanced threat protection to ensure data integrity and privacy.
  • Scalability
    The server supports horizontal and vertical scaling to accommodate growing amounts of data and increasing number of users.
  • Integration with Microsoft Ecosystem
    Seamless integration with other Microsoft products such as Azure, Power BI, and Visual Studio, making it a versatile choice for businesses already using Microsoft services.
  • Ease of Use
    The server provides a user-friendly interface and helpful tools such as SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) for database maintenance and management.
  • Comprehensive Support
    Microsoft offers extensive support and documentation, along with a strong community that provides additional resources and insights.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft SQL Server

  • Cost
    Licensing and operational costs can be high, especially for larger enterprises, making it a significant investment.
  • Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, often requiring expert knowledge to deploy and maintain effectively.
  • Resource Intensive
    The server can be resource-heavy, requiring significant hardware and computational resources to run efficiently, especially for larger databases.
  • Limited Cross-Platform Support
    Although improvements have been made, SQL Server is primarily optimized for Windows environments, which can limit its use in cross-platform scenarios.
  • Proprietary Software
    Being a proprietary software solution, it lacks the flexibility and cost benefits that come with open-source alternatives.
  • Updates and Patches
    Frequent updates and patches can sometimes disrupt service, requiring periodic maintenance that could result in downtime.

Amazon Elastic File System features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon EFS automatically scales your file system storage capacity up or down as you add or remove files, which helps meet varying workload demands without the need for manual intervention.
  • Managed Service
    As a fully managed service, Amazon EFS handles storage infrastructure management tasks such as hardware provisioning, patching, and performance tuning, enabling users to focus on application development.
  • Elasticity
    Amazon EFS provides elastic storage capacity, so you only pay for the storage you use, which can result in cost savings and greater efficiency compared to traditional file systems.
  • Multi-AZ Resilience
    Amazon EFS is designed to be highly-available and resilient with data redundantly stored across multiple Availability Zones, ensuring durability and availability of critical workloads.
  • POSIX-Compliant
    EFS offers a POSIX-compliant file system which makes it compatible with a wide range of legacy and modern applications, easing integration and migration processes.
  • Integration with AWS Services
    It seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as EC2, ECS, and Lambda, providing users with a cohesive and comprehensive cloud ecosystem for building and deploying applications.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon Elastic File System

  • Higher Latency
    Compared to other storage services like EBS, Amazon EFS might exhibit higher latency due to its network file system nature, potentially impacting performance-sensitive applications.
  • Cost
    Amazon EFS can be more expensive than alternatives like Amazon S3 or EBS, especially for workloads with lower IOPS requirements, due to its pricing model based on storage and access.
  • Consistency Model
    While EFS offers eventual consistency for write operations from multiple connections, this can lead to potential data visibility issues if not managed carefully in concurrent write scenarios.
  • Mount Targets Limitation
    Each Amazon EFS file system can have a limited number of mount targets per VPC, potentially restricting its usability for environments with a large number of instances across multiple subnets.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Amazon EFS is primarily designed for Linux-based workloads, which can pose challenges or require additional configurations when used with Windows-based applications.

Microsoft SQL Server videos

What is Microsoft SQL Server?

Amazon Elastic File System videos

AWS EFS Tutorial | Amazon Elastic File System | AWS Storage Services | AWS Training | Edureka

More videos:

  • Review - What's New with Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Microsoft SQL Server and Amazon Elastic File System)
Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Microsoft SQL Server and Amazon Elastic File System. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Microsoft SQL Server and Amazon Elastic File System

Microsoft SQL Server Reviews

20 Best SQL Management Tools in 2020
It is a SQL management tool for analysing the differences in Microsoft SQL Server database structures. It allows comparing database objects like tables, columns, indexes, foreign keys, schemas, etc.
Source: www.guru99.com

Amazon Elastic File System Reviews

We have no reviews of Amazon Elastic File System yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon Elastic File System should be more popular than Microsoft SQL Server. It has been mentiond 25 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Microsoft SQL Server mentions (5)

  • Cloud provider comparison 2024: VM Performance / Price
    Azure is the #2 overall Cloud provider and, as expected, it's the best choice for most Microsoft/Windows-based solutions. That said, it does offer many types of Linux VMs, with quite similar abilities as AWS/GCP. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Amdocs, NVIDIA and Microsoft Azure build custom LLMs for telcos
    Amdocs has partnered with NVIDIA and Microsoft Azure to build custom Large Language Models (LLMs) for the $1.7 trillion global telecoms industry. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Windows Azure: Microsoft's crown jewel
    You can utilise various tools on the platform to significantly improve your IT performance. Due to its flexibility, even official recommendations for Azure might need to be clarified and easier to comprehend. Simply put, Azure (formerly Windows Azure) is Microsoft's cloud computing operating system. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • From developer to (solutions) architect. A simple guide.
    This is not to say there aren't architects still working on premise in self managed environments, but if you're planning to join the forces, you probably want to have an idea of who are the 3 public cloud providers (AWS, Azure and GCP), and their offering and topology. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Can You Learn AWS (And Get Certified) With No Experience? e.g. No IT background or degree
    Right now, AWS couldn’t be a better choice. AWS has been for many years—and continues to be—the market leader between all the cloud platforms. Whilst the competitors like GCP and Azure are catching up, they’ve still not toppled AWS which continues to be, by far, the biggest cloud provider. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Amazon Elastic File System mentions (25)

  • Get Started with Serverless Architectures: Top Tools You Need to Know
    AWS Lambda AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your backend code in response to events such as object uploads and HTTP requests. It automatically handles all the capacity, patching, scaling, and administration of the infrastructure to run your AWS Lambda functions. Lambda also provides visibility and performance and automatically manages the computing resources, making it easy to build applications that... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • ⚡🦀 Deploy a blazing-fast & Lightweight LLM app with Rust-Rig-LanceDB
    LanceDB's underlying optimized storage format, lance, is flexible enough to be supported by various storage backends, such as local NVMe, EBS, EFS, S3 and other third-party APIs that connect to the cloud. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Mount Up! A Step-by-Step Guide to Creating and Using Amazon EFS on Ubuntu
    Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides a simple, scalable, and fully managed Network File System for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. This guide will walk you through the process of creating an EFS, mounting it on an Ubuntu instance, and adding files to it. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Mastering AWS: Deploying a Complex Three-Tier Architecture for Production
    AWS EFS is a managed shared storage solution in the cloud that is compatible with NFS. In our three-tier architecture, it sits in the data layer and provides shared storage for the application tier servers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Building a Serverless AI Content Detector
    But that didn't work quite so well. Between some issues with the packages, and the amount of time it took to unzip... It just wasn't worth it. So I refactored back into using EFS to host the packages and model files. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Microsoft SQL Server and Amazon Elastic File System, you can also consider the following products

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Azure File Storage - Try Azure File Storage for managed file shares that use standard SMB 3.0 protocol. Share data with on-premises and cloud servers, integrate with apps, and more.

PostgreSQL - PostgreSQL is a powerful, open source object-relational database system.

Cyberduck - A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.

SQLite - SQLite Home Page

Google Cloud Filestore - Fully-managed cloud file storage