Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Amazon RDS for MySQL VS Amazon Elastic File System

Compare Amazon RDS for MySQL VS Amazon Elastic File System and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Amazon RDS for MySQL logo Amazon RDS for MySQL

Amazon RDS for MySQL, the relational database service that makes it easy to set up, operate, and scale MySQL deployments in the cloud.

Amazon Elastic File System logo Amazon Elastic File System

Amazon Elastic File System is a cloud-native and serverless data store that provides simple saleable elastic shared file storage for Linux-based business applications.
  • Amazon RDS for MySQL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-05
  • Amazon Elastic File System Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-05

Amazon RDS for MySQL features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Amazon Elastic File System features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon EFS automatically scales your file system storage capacity up or down as you add or remove files, which helps meet varying workload demands without the need for manual intervention.
  • Managed Service
    As a fully managed service, Amazon EFS handles storage infrastructure management tasks such as hardware provisioning, patching, and performance tuning, enabling users to focus on application development.
  • Elasticity
    Amazon EFS provides elastic storage capacity, so you only pay for the storage you use, which can result in cost savings and greater efficiency compared to traditional file systems.
  • Multi-AZ Resilience
    Amazon EFS is designed to be highly-available and resilient with data redundantly stored across multiple Availability Zones, ensuring durability and availability of critical workloads.
  • POSIX-Compliant
    EFS offers a POSIX-compliant file system which makes it compatible with a wide range of legacy and modern applications, easing integration and migration processes.
  • Integration with AWS Services
    It seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as EC2, ECS, and Lambda, providing users with a cohesive and comprehensive cloud ecosystem for building and deploying applications.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon Elastic File System

  • Higher Latency
    Compared to other storage services like EBS, Amazon EFS might exhibit higher latency due to its network file system nature, potentially impacting performance-sensitive applications.
  • Cost
    Amazon EFS can be more expensive than alternatives like Amazon S3 or EBS, especially for workloads with lower IOPS requirements, due to its pricing model based on storage and access.
  • Consistency Model
    While EFS offers eventual consistency for write operations from multiple connections, this can lead to potential data visibility issues if not managed carefully in concurrent write scenarios.
  • Mount Targets Limitation
    Each Amazon EFS file system can have a limited number of mount targets per VPC, potentially restricting its usability for environments with a large number of instances across multiple subnets.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Amazon EFS is primarily designed for Linux-based workloads, which can pose challenges or require additional configurations when used with Windows-based applications.

Amazon RDS for MySQL videos

No Amazon RDS for MySQL videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Amazon Elastic File System videos

AWS EFS Tutorial | Amazon Elastic File System | AWS Storage Services | AWS Training | Edureka

More videos:

  • Review - What's New with Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Amazon RDS for MySQL and Amazon Elastic File System)
Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100
Relational Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Amazon RDS for MySQL and Amazon Elastic File System. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon Elastic File System seems to be a lot more popular than Amazon RDS for MySQL. While we know about 25 links to Amazon Elastic File System, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Amazon RDS for MySQL. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Amazon RDS for MySQL mentions (2)

Amazon Elastic File System mentions (25)

  • Get Started with Serverless Architectures: Top Tools You Need to Know
    AWS Lambda AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your backend code in response to events such as object uploads and HTTP requests. It automatically handles all the capacity, patching, scaling, and administration of the infrastructure to run your AWS Lambda functions. Lambda also provides visibility and performance and automatically manages the computing resources, making it easy to build applications that... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • ⚡🦀 Deploy a blazing-fast & Lightweight LLM app with Rust-Rig-LanceDB
    LanceDB's underlying optimized storage format, lance, is flexible enough to be supported by various storage backends, such as local NVMe, EBS, EFS, S3 and other third-party APIs that connect to the cloud. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Mount Up! A Step-by-Step Guide to Creating and Using Amazon EFS on Ubuntu
    Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides a simple, scalable, and fully managed Network File System for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. This guide will walk you through the process of creating an EFS, mounting it on an Ubuntu instance, and adding files to it. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Mastering AWS: Deploying a Complex Three-Tier Architecture for Production
    AWS EFS is a managed shared storage solution in the cloud that is compatible with NFS. In our three-tier architecture, it sits in the data layer and provides shared storage for the application tier servers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Building a Serverless AI Content Detector
    But that didn't work quite so well. Between some issues with the packages, and the amount of time it took to unzip... It just wasn't worth it. So I refactored back into using EFS to host the packages and model files. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Amazon RDS for MySQL and Amazon Elastic File System, you can also consider the following products

Google Cloud SQL - Google Cloud SQL is a fully-managed database service that makes it easy to set-up, maintain, manage and administer your MySQL database.

Azure File Storage - Try Azure File Storage for managed file shares that use standard SMB 3.0 protocol. Share data with on-premises and cloud servers, integrate with apps, and more.

Amazon RDS - Easy to manage relational databases optimized for total cost of ownership.

Cyberduck - A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.

Amazon Aurora - MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud. Performance and availability of commercial-grade databases at 1/10th the cost.

Google Cloud Filestore - Fully-managed cloud file storage