Amazon Elastic File System VS Forklift

Amazon Elastic File System Reviews

Forklift Reviews

Amazon Elastic File System mentions (22)

• Mastering AWS: Deploying a Complex Three-Tier Architecture for Production

  AWS EFS is a managed shared storage solution in the cloud that is compatible with NFS. In our three-tier architecture, it sits in the data layer and provides shared storage for the application tier servers. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago

• Building a Serverless AI Content Detector

  But that didn't work quite so well. Between some issues with the packages, and the amount of time it took to unzip... It just wasn't worth it. So I refactored back into using EFS to host the packages and model files. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

• A Practical Guide To Deploying A Complex, Production Level, Three-tier Architecture On AWS

  AWS EFS is a fully managed, highly scalable shared storage solution in the cloud. It is NFS compatible. This Elastic filesystem will provide shared storage for all our application tier servers. Since it provides storage, EFS sits in the data layer of the three tier architecture. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago

• EBS vs. EFS: Which Storage System Is Right For You?

  Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) is a managed Network File System (NFS) designed for Linux-based EC2 instances, selected AWS managed services, and on-premise servers. There’s a similar storage system for Windows hosts called the Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. FSx uses the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol while EFS uses NFS. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• Serverless Storage

  Amazon EFS, Amazon RDS Proxy, Amazon Aurora Serverless, Amazon Redshift Serverless, Amazon Neptune Serverless This is my serverless database catch-all section. In my opinion, S3 and DynamoDB are really the storage solutions you need for serverless development, however, you may find some use cases for these remaining serverless storage options. EFS is the Elastic File System, which automagically sizes for the... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Forklift mentions (32)

• macOS Finder is still bad at network file copies

  Forklift (https://binarynights.com/) and Path Finder (https://www.cocoatech.io/) are the two big ones I think. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• Double Commander – Changes in version 1.1.0

  If you're on Mac, you might also want to try Forklift – by coincidence, they just release major version 4 yesterday. https://binarynights.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Total Commander

  There are couple which will have two panels by default, but in my opinion, ForkLift is very native macOS commander-like app -- https://binarynights.com. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Finder alternatives for performance?

  Forklift is what I use though never with that many files in a single directory. I know I have used it for ones that had 1000+ files with no slowness. It has a free trial so give it a try. Source: 12 months ago

• DESKTOP2 – A Graphical User Interface for DOS

  Heh, I've been there as well a decade ago when switching from windows to macos. Far manager was also the first program I'd also install on any box. I can assure you, this will eventually pass :) To be fair, far is also not a match to modern file browsers like https://binarynights.com (forklift), especially if you need s3 integration etc. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago