Amazon Aurora VS OpenShift Container Platform

Amazon Aurora Reviews

OpenShift Container Platform Reviews

Amazon Aurora mentions (20)

• Vector database is not a separate database category

  As far as the big players are concerned, Google offers AlloyDB (https://cloud.google.com/alloydb) while Amazon offers Aurora (https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/). - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Building realtime experiences with Amazon Aurora

  Aurora is a managed database service from Amazon compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL. It allows for the use of existing MySQL code, tools, and applications and can offer increased performance for certain workloads compared to MySQL and PostgreSQL. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago

• Interview candidates that don't know the stuff on their CV's - What am I missing?

  See my other comment on this thread. More typically you'd use RDS for external DB. Aurora is a megascale version. Source: 12 months ago

• multi write in the same time

  If you get to a point where RDS cannot handle your work load you can migrate to Amazon Aurora: Https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/. Source: about 1 year ago

• "Everything in games has a budget. When we use the term 'budget', as developers, we're not talking about money. You know, a lot a lot of people hear that thing, they think, 'Oh, that's how much money you spend...'"

  Just like how DB replication and load-balancers exists for ~20 years, SC is making far worse version of them under different name. So this "budget" thingy is just another distraction for cult to discuss, so the followers can claim "they know game development". Source: about 1 year ago

OpenShift Container Platform mentions (0)