Adonis JS

Website

adonisjs.com

$ Details

Categories

#Web Frameworks #JavaScript Framework #Javascript Web Framework #Developer Tools

gRPC

Website

grpc.io

$ Details

Categories

#Web Servers #Web And Application Servers #Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy #Developer Tools

Adonis JS features and specs

• Modern Eco-System
  AdonisJS uses the latest JavaScript (ES6/ES7) features, providing an up-to-date and efficient development environment. This includes async/await for handling asynchronous code, making it easier to write and understand.
• ORM Support
  The framework includes a built-in ORM called Lucid, which simplifies database interactions by allowing developers to work with database records through straightforward JavaScript models.
• MVC Architecture
  AdonisJS follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern, which helps organize code in a clean and maintainable manner, making it easier to manage large applications.
• Built-In Authentication and Authorization
  AdonisJS comes with out-of-the-box solutions for user authentication and authorization, reducing the time required to set up these critical features in applications.
• Thorough Documentation
  AdonisJS provides comprehensive and well-maintained documentation, which makes it easier for developers to get started and find solutions to their problems quickly.
• Rich CLI
  The Command Line Interface (CLI) for AdonisJS is rich with features, facilitating a range of tasks from project scaffolding to running migrations, thus speeding up the development process.

Possible disadvantages of Adonis JS

• Learning Curve
  Although the framework is well-documented, its rich set of features and unique conventions can present a steep learning curve for beginners or those new to JavaScript frameworks.
• Limited Ecosystem
  Compared to more established frameworks like Express.js or Laravel, AdonisJS has a smaller ecosystem of third-party packages and community resources.
• Performance Overhead
  Due to its comprehensive feature set, AdonisJS can have more performance overhead compared to microframeworks that offer more control and fewer built-in features.
• Smaller Community
  While growing, the community around AdonisJS is still smaller than that of other established frameworks. This can sometimes make it more challenging to find community-driven support and solutions.
• Rapid Changes
  As a relatively new framework, AdonisJS undergoes frequent updates and changes. Keeping up with these changes can demand additional effort from developers.

gRPC features and specs

• Performance
  gRPC uses Protocol Buffers, which are more efficient in terms of serialization and deserialization compared to text-based formats like JSON. This leads to lower CPU usage and faster transmission, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
• Bi-directional Streaming
  gRPC supports bi-directional streaming, enabling both client and server to send a series of messages through a single connection. This is particularly useful for real-time communication applications.
• Strongly Typed APIs
  gRPC uses Protocol Buffers for defining service methods and message types, providing a strong type system that can catch potential issues at compile-time rather than runtime.
• Cross-language Support
  gRPC supports a wide range of programming languages, including but not limited to Java, C++, Python, Go, and C#. This allows for flexible integration in polyglot environments.
• Built-in Deadlines/Timeouts
  gRPC natively supports deadlines and timeouts to help manage long-running calls and avoid indefinite blocking, improving robustness and reliability.
• Automatic Code Generation
  gRPC provides tools for automatic code generation from .proto files, reducing boilerplate code and speeding up the development process.

Possible disadvantages of gRPC

• Learning Curve
  The complexity of gRPC and Protocol Buffers may present a steep learning curve for developers who are not familiar with these technologies.
• Limited Browser Support
  gRPC was not originally designed with browser support in mind, making it challenging to directly call gRPC services from web applications without additional tools like gRPC-Web.
• Verbose Configuration
  Setting up gRPC and defining .proto files can be more verbose compared to simpler RESTful APIs, which might be a deterrent for smaller projects.
• HTTP/2 Requirement
  gRPC relies on HTTP/2 for transport, which can be problematic in environments where HTTP/2 is not supported or requires additional configuration.
• Limited Monitoring and Debugging Tools
  Compared to REST, there are fewer tools available for monitoring, debugging, and testing gRPC services, which might complicate troubleshooting and performance tuning.
• Protobuf Ecosystem Requirement
  Depending on the language, integrating Protocol Buffers might require additional dependencies and tooling, which could add to the maintenance overhead.

Tutoriel NodeJS : Découverte d'Adonis

gRPC, Protobufs and Go... OH MY! An introduction to building client/server systems with gRPC

More videos: