Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

AccessLint VS Total Validator

Compare AccessLint VS Total Validator and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

AccessLint logo AccessLint

AccessLint finds accessibility issues in your GitHub PRs

Total Validator logo Total Validator

Total Validator can check your website to help ensure that it is accessible, uses valid HTML and CSS, has no broken links, and is free from spelling mistakes.
  • AccessLint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-25
  • Total Validator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-20

AccessLint features and specs

  • Automatic Accessibility Checks
    AccessLint automates the process of checking for accessibility issues in web applications, helping developers ensure compliance with accessibility standards efficiently.
  • Integration with CI/CD
    The tool integrates well with continuous integration and deployment pipelines, enabling seamless accessibility testing as part of the development workflow.
  • Detailed Issue Reporting
    AccessLint provides detailed reports on accessibility issues, making it easier for developers to understand and address the problems.
  • Saves Time
    By automating accessibility checks, AccessLint saves significant time for developers compared to manual testing.

Possible disadvantages of AccessLint

  • Dependency on Automated Tools
    AccessLint relies on automated tools which might not catch all accessibility issues, especially those requiring manual verification such as color contrast or logical flow.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated testing tools, AccessLint may produce false positives or negatives, which could lead to confusion or unnecessary work.
  • Requires Initial Setup
    Integrating AccessLint into a development workflow requires initial setup and configuration, which might be a hurdle for some teams.
  • Limited Scope
    AccessLint's automated checks are limited to certain types of issues, potentially missing out on a comprehensive analysis of accessibility.

Total Validator features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

AccessLint videos

+ Add

Install AccessLint for GitHub Accessibility Review

Total Validator videos

+ Add

How to use the Total Validator Tool

More videos:

  • Review - Using Total Validator

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AccessLint and Total Validator)

AccessLint

Total Validator

Website Testing
100 100%
Website Testing
0% 0
Website Monitoring
0 0%
Website Monitoring
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0
SEO
32 32%
SEO
68% 68

User comments

Share your experience with using AccessLint and Total Validator. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AccessLint and Total Validator, you can also consider the following products

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Rocket Validator - Site-wide Accessibility and HTML validation made easy. With a single click, Rocket Validator will check thousands of web pages on your site for Accessibility and HTML conformance, producing a detailed, actionable report on seconds.

HTML Validator - HTML Validator is a Mozilla extension that adds HTML validation inside Firefox and Mozilla.

W3C Markup Validation Service - Validates HTML markup of web pages, one at a time.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

mailmouse - HTML Email Check and Validation Tool

Loading...