AbeBooks VS RegExr

Have you not searched for used book sites? There are so many and you can definitely get the size of paperback you want at usually good prices. Eg betterworldbooks.com wob.com, abebooks.com etc etc. Source: 6 months ago

New Directions for Strings Teacher's Manual Book 2 [Soft Cover ] ($29.75 on abebooks.com because on Amazon it was like $40 something I think). Source: 9 months ago

Hi - my 2 primary sites to find publications are amazon.com and abebooks.com. I've found used copies of reference books on both sites. Since I collect Australia, I also watch the Australian auction site. I've found some great books in auctions. Of course, the shipping sometimes is more than the book. I also use eBay, but for some reason, the publications I look for are not as commonly found there. Source: 10 months ago

Found an old hardcover 1980 edition of this on abebooks.com ran me just under $15 total shipped from Germany! I'm mainly interested in better info on the 1800's coins, which I'm guessing was pretty well sorted by 1980, so should still be a good extra resource to have. Source: 10 months ago

A lot of my money's gone to abebooks.com now that I can stay focussed all the way through a book. Source: 10 months ago

Use online regex testers: Tools like Regex101 or RegExr can help visualize how your regex matches against test strings, providing explanations and highlighting potential issues. - Source: dev.to / about 11 hours ago

When thinking about how I might compare an arrangement to the contiguous group of damaged springs, I used regexr.com to experiment with very specific regexs that used the numbers. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

There are plenty of online regex tools to test and experiment with regex patterns. Some popular ones include RegExr, RegEx101, and RegexPlanet. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

Using regexr.com it at least appears to work as expected. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

If you are going to use RE's, use something like https://regexr.com/ to double check that they're doing what you want. I was suspicious of your 'cols = re.findall(r'\d+ .....', i)' line, and indeed it does miss some columns. You should rethink your column detection, and either not use REs or learn how to use capture groups and \w. There would then be no reason to use yet another RE in your column iterator to... Source: 5 months ago