Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

98.css VS Puter

Compare 98.css VS Puter and see what are their differences

98.css logo 98.css

A design system for building faithful recreations of old UIs

Puter logo Puter

Puter is a cloud operating system. Store, open, and edit your files from anywhere at any time in the cloud.
  • 98.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-04-22
  • Puter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-03

98.css features and specs

  • Nostalgic Appeal
    98.css provides a nostalgic Windows 98 aesthetic, appealing to users who have an affinity for retro computing and creating a unique visual experience.
  • Lightweight
    The framework is lightweight, making it easy to integrate without significantly increasing page load times.
  • Minimalist Design
    It offers a minimalist and straightforward design, which can be beneficial for projects that require simplicity and less visual clutter.
  • Easy Customization
    While it adheres to a specific retro theme, the CSS can be customized to suit the needs of the developer, allowing for flexible design applications.

Possible disadvantages of 98.css

  • Limited Modern Features
    98.css focuses on replicating the Windows 98 look and feel, which means it lacks support for more modern web design trends and features.
  • Niche Audience
    The retro aesthetic may not appeal to all users and could be inappropriate for certain professional or modern applications.
  • Style Constraints
    The framework’s dedication to the Windows 98 aesthetic can limit creativity, making it difficult to diverge from the retro style if project requirements change.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    While lightweight, integrating 98.css with other modern frameworks or libraries may cause compatibility issues or require additional workarounds.

Puter features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    Puter offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface that makes it simple for users of all technical levels to interact with the platform effectively.
  • Comprehensive Features
    The platform provides a wide range of features that cater to diverse user needs, ensuring that all necessary functionalities are at the user’s fingertips.
  • Reliable Performance
    Puter is known for its robust performance with minimal downtime, ensuring users can rely on it for critical operations without disruptions.
  • Strong Support
    Offers excellent customer support with knowledgeable staff who provide timely assistance and problem resolution.
  • Frequent Updates
    Regularly provides updates that introduce new features and enhancements to keep the software current and useful for modern needs.

Possible disadvantages of Puter

  • High Cost
    Puter can be expensive compared to similar platforms, which may be a barrier for smaller organizations or individual users.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, some of the more advanced features require a significant amount of time and effort to master effectively.
  • Limited Customization
    The platform offers limited opportunities for customization, which may be a drawback for users looking for highly personalized solutions.
  • Resource Intensive
    Puter might require more computing resources, which can slow down performance on older hardware or less powerful systems.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Despite its reliability, users sometimes encounter bugs, particularly following updates, that can temporarily hinder functionality.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to 98.css and Puter)
Design Tools
77 77%
23% 23
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100
Web App
100 100%
0% 0
File Sharing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using 98.css and Puter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, 98.css should be more popular than Puter. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

98.css mentions (18)

View more

Puter mentions (12)

  • After 2 years of hard work, Puter finally enters beta!
    I'm extremely excited to announce that Puter which was first announced on this subreddit is now in beta. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Copycat
    How did you make puter.com run a file,what format does it need to be in. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What happens when you reach #1 on Hacker News
    Around two months ago my startup Puter hit #1 on Hacker News. Source: over 2 years ago
  • My personal "OS in the browser" is nearly POSIX-compliant!
    If puter.com becomes a subscription service, then it will have a revenue stream separate from advertising. If the service is free, then the users are the product (attention being sold to the highest advertising bidder). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Cloud Based Desktop Environment
    Thanks! None is exactly what I'm looking for, but they look very processing. I actually found another one after I wrote the post called Puter https://puter.com/ that looks interesting, but it's in alpha. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing 98.css and Puter, you can also consider the following products

Virtual Windows 98 - Use Windows 98 in your browser

daedalOS - daedalOS is a recreation of the desktop environment experience on the web.https://dustinbrett.com/

Windows95 - Windows 95 in Electron. Runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows.

Windows 96 - Windows 96 is a recreation of Windows 98 in the browser.

Next-Level Database Techniques For Devs - Learn secret SQL features to become a database wizard!

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.