Software Alternatives & Reviews

Parcel Reviews

Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler

Social recommendations and mentions

We have tracked the following product recommendations or mentions on Reddit and HackerNews. They can help you see what people think about Parcel and what they use it for.
  • Using Vite for regular websites and not SPA/JS frameworks
    Parcel is another option that is "batteries included" that you could check out if Vite doesn't fit your needs. - Source: Reddit / 1 day ago
  • JavaScript Module Bundlers and all that Jazz ✨
    Parcel is a popular zero configuration build tool for the web. Some of its popular features include -. - Source: / 6 days ago
  • Should I start of with Typescript?
    If your goal is to really dive into this and do things "the right way" the first time, then I'd grab a starter project and/or framework that plays nice with TypeScript as-is. is a particularly simple builder that works with TS and I like to use it for throwing ideas together because it mostly "just works". But mostly it'll be a lot of research and reading the docs and iterating. - Source: Reddit / 18 days ago
  • Building on Reddit's API with JavaScript
    Parcel is a JavaScript bundler for Web applications with zero configuration and is straight-forward to set up. It packages all the application files in a dist folder, so the application can be run. - Source: / about 1 month ago
  • React on Amplify, using Parcel, doesn't load
    I used Parcel ( to create a React app as an alternative to create-react-app. Works locally, as they do, and then when I deploy to Amplify I get "Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token '<' " No amount of searching and tweaking this code has helped. - Source: Reddit / about 1 month ago
  • Tried SCSS and now I don't want to ever go back to writing plain CSS again.
    Sounds like you're looking for ParcelJS - Source: Reddit / about 1 month ago
  • Django and Tailwind
    FWIW, I'm using and to handle collecting and building the static assets for .js (Alpine and HTMX) and .css (Tailwind). I found it cleaner separation of concerns to let the JavaScript tooling manage the JavaScript dependencies, and have been happy with the performance and flexibility of this approach. - Source: Reddit / about 2 months ago
  • Do you guys create a separate css page for each html file(page)?
    Webpack is just fine, but it can be very complex and tends to have a high learning curve. Tools like parcel and rollup do more or less the same thing as webpack, but they're much easier to learn, tend to be more forgiving, and require a lot less boilerplate setup to get up and running. - Source: Reddit / 3 months ago
  • Hindsight is a free and open-source retrospective board
    It's a React application written in TypeScript using Parcel. - Source: Reddit / 3 months ago
  • Show HN: Hindsight is a free and open-source retrospective board
    - Data export. Feel free to leave feedback here or on GitHub[3]. Perhaps it could be helpful to you as well. Cheers! 1. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Setting up a custom toolchain
    A bundler lets you write modular code and bundle it together into small packages to optimize load time. Popular bundlers: webpack, Parcel, esbuild, swc. - Source: Reddit / 3 months ago
  • Getting Tailwind to Work with Elm Book
    Most front-end frameworks nowadays include these features as part of their CLI’s such as Create React App, Angular’s ng-cli, etc. For those that don’t, many will use a combination of some type of bundler like Parcel, Rollup, or Webpack and a browser refresher like livereload. This enables you to write code, save it, and immediately see the results. This in turn leads to fast feedback as you iterate all day in this... - Source: / 4 months ago
  • Getting Started With Parcel.js: A Web Application Bundler in 2022
    Webpack is the most popular bundler and it followed on the heels of Require.js, Rollup, and similar solutions. But the learning curve for a tool like webpack is steep. Getting started with webpack isn’t easy due to its complex configurations. As a result, in recent years another solution has emerged. This tool is not necessarily a front-runner, but an easier-to-digest alternative on the front-end module bundler... - Source: / 5 months ago
  • Vercel announces Turbopack, the successor to Webpack
    > I just wanna `script/build` or `yarn dev` and not think about it anymore. Parcel might be a good fit for you: - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Vercel announces Turbopack, the successor to Webpack
    After years of configuring webpack for various projects I have finally decided to migrate all my projects to Parcel[1] manly because I got tired of creating and maintaining hundreds of lines of webpack.config.js files, I wanted something that just works. I am really happy with that decision. Parcel is plenty fast and is pretty much zero config, I can use it to build libraries[2] as well as applications[3] for the... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Couple super basic Typescript questions from a newbie: how to compile and how to start learning
    Assuming you’re familiar with node and your package manager of choice, I’d recommend looking at parcel. It will let you serve vanilla HTML, CSS, and TS files to a local dev server just like you would normally with vanilla JS. - Source: Reddit / 6 months ago
  • How important is to use webpack for front end developement?
    Look at parcel if you want something easier maybe. - Source: Reddit / 7 months ago
  • can I use react instead of webpack?
    I would suggest you to look at parcel. It's much easier to set up then webpack and also much quicker and handles shaders out of the box. - Source: Reddit / 7 months ago
  • [AskJS] When it's time to migrate away from CommonJS
    Join me as I walk through the current state of JavaScript's module ecosystem, outline how you can prepare for a migration to an ESM bundler, and step through the challenges of trying to configure 3 different popular build tools: rollup.js, Parcel, and esbuild. - Source: Reddit / 7 months ago
  • 📦 Bundle Node.js into single executable binary
    However, using the ESM packaging format has one advantage than CJS: tree-shaking. Tree-shaking is the concept of removing unused code from a dependency. Tools: esbuild, parcel, webpack, rollup, terser. - Source: / 7 months ago
  • How to make a simple webpage again after working with heavy frameworks for 5 years?
    I've recently started using parcel for very simple websites to facilitate bundling without having to write lots of configuration from the get go. - Source: Reddit / 8 months ago

External sources with reviews and comparisons of Parcel

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Parcel's caching feature sees dramatically decreases in time consumption after the initial run. For frequent, small changes, in smaller projects **Parcel*8 is a great choice.
If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!
document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero Configuration: Webpack Vs ParcelWebpackYes.We bring a...
First impressions with Parcel JS
The big selling point of Parcel though is that it offers a zero configuration experience. This means all the features are available out of the box! It also boasts blazing fast bundle times 👟 You won’t be configuring how Parcel works or having to draft in various plugins to get started. If you do need something, Parcel magically detects this and will pull in stuff for you on the fly 😎
Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind
Parcel has made their own benchmarks of Parcel and other bundlers. Parcel has been criticized because they have not made the benchmarks open source. People cannot verify that the benchmarks are true when they are not open source.

Do you know an article comparing Parcel to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.