Software Alternatives & Reviews

Parcel

Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler subtitle

Parcel Reviews and details

Screenshots and images

  • Parcel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-13

Badges & Trophies

Promote Parcel. You can add any of these badges on your website.
SaaSHub badge
Show embed code
SaaSHub badge
Show embed code

Videos

Danby Parcel Guard Smart Mailbox blogger Review

PARCEL MOVIE REVIEW | SASWATA CHATTERJEE | RITUPARNA SENGUPTA | RUPAM'S REVIEW

Le Parcel Box review

Social recommendations and mentions

We have tracked the following product recommendations or mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you see what people think about Parcel and what they use it for.
  • React Server Components Example with Next.js
    In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldn’t find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I can’t say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask
    Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Building Node.js applications without dependencies
    I’ve tried something similar on the frontend side: I decided to build a UI for Ollama.ai using only HTML, CSS, and JS (Single-Page Application). The goal is to learn something new and have zero runtime dependencies on other projects and NPM modules. Only Node and Parcel.js (https://parceljs.org/) are needed during development for serving files, bundling, etc. The only runtime dependency is a modern browser. Here's... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • 11 Ways to Optimize Your Website
    Besides Webpack, there are many other popular web bundlers available, such as Parcel, Esbuild, Rollup, and more. They all have their own unique features and strengths, and you should make your decision based on the needs and requirements of your specific project. Please refer to their official websites for details. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Bun vs Node.js: Everything you need to know
    In the Node.js ecosystem, bundling is typically handled by third-party tools rather than Node.js itself. Some of the most popular bundlers in the Node.js world include Webpack, Rollup, and Parcel, offering features like code splitting, tree shaking, and hot module replacement. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Whatever It Takes
    My first challenge here was the migration from vanilla JS to utilizing tools like Parcel and React. React, I was a bit familiar with; however, I had never heard of Parcel.js in my life. Several days were spent troubleshooting why my build process was not working on Netlify before I finally found out that I had to set up my Netlify Build Settings specifically for using a bundler like Parcel.js. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • 5 Different Tools to Bundle Node.js Apps
    Parcel is another popular bundler you can use to bundle Node.js applications. Unlike Webpack, you do not need to write additional configurations with Parcel since it is a zero-configuration bundler. It is capable of automatically detecting and bundling project dependencies. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Vite vs Rollup vs Webpack vs ESbuild ,difference between frontend tool and a bundler
    I believe so, but I've never done anything extensive with Vite, so I don't know how opinionated it really is. It certainly doesn't seem to be aiming for zero config, like Parcel. Source: 11 months ago
  • Can Vite be a replacement for my Webpack config?
    I have been using Parcel lately and that's done decent but the docs are lacking for details more obscure configuration. Literally all of my more advanced questions are answered from digging through the Github issues which is pretty bad UX imo. At least with Webpack there was lots of (for the most part) good documentation or examples to jump off of. Source: 12 months ago
  • It looks like create-react-app is dead. What should I use instead?
    I've started to use parcel for all my projects: https://parceljs.org/. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Live preview of vanilla CSS as I change it?
    The simplest solution might be to use parcel https://parceljs.org/ > The zero configuration build tool for the web. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • How are you building React applications? It's time to move on from Create React App
    What about rolling your own? Most people that have only ever used CRA, Next.js, or similar tools will think that seems like a lot of work. In the past, it usually did require quite a bit of knowledge about webpack, so you aren't wrong. But tooling has come a long way, and tools like Parcel, NX, and Razzle have simplified the process. Even more recently, Vite has gained an ever-increasing market share. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • What should I do with React projects that used CRA?
    Parcel is also another alternative to vite: https://parceljs.org/. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Using Vite for regular websites and not SPA/JS frameworks
    Parcel is another option that is "batteries included" that you could check out if Vite doesn't fit your needs. Source: about 1 year ago
  • JavaScript Module Bundlers and all that Jazz ✨
    Parcel is a popular zero configuration build tool for the web. Some of its popular features include -. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Should I start of with Typescript?
    If your goal is to really dive into this and do things "the right way" the first time, then I'd grab a starter project and/or framework that plays nice with TypeScript as-is. https://parceljs.org/ is a particularly simple builder that works with TS and I like to use it for throwing ideas together because it mostly "just works". But mostly it'll be a lot of research and reading the docs and iterating. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Building on Reddit's API with JavaScript
    Parcel is a JavaScript bundler for Web applications with zero configuration and is straight-forward to set up. It packages all the application files in a dist folder, so the application can be run. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • React on Amplify, using Parcel, doesn't load
    I used Parcel (parceljs.org) to create a React app as an alternative to create-react-app. Works locally, as they do, and then when I deploy to Amplify I get "Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token '<' " No amount of searching and tweaking this code has helped. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Tried SCSS and now I don't want to ever go back to writing plain CSS again.
    Sounds like you're looking for ParcelJS https://parceljs.org/. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Django and Tailwind
    FWIW, I'm using https://pnpm.io and https://parceljs.org to handle collecting and building the static assets for .js (Alpine and HTMX) and .css (Tailwind). I found it cleaner separation of concerns to let the JavaScript tooling manage the JavaScript dependencies, and have been happy with the performance and flexibility of this approach. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Do you guys create a separate css page for each html file(page)?
    Webpack is just fine, but it can be very complex and tends to have a high learning curve. Tools like parcel and rollup do more or less the same thing as webpack, but they're much easier to learn, tend to be more forgiving, and require a lot less boilerplate setup to get up and running. Source: over 1 year ago

External sources with reviews and comparisons of Parcel

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Parcel's caching feature sees dramatically decreases in time consumption after the initial run. For frequent, small changes, in smaller projects **Parcel*8 is a great choice.
If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!
document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero Configuration: Webpack Vs ParcelWebpackYes.We bring a...
First impressions with Parcel JS
The big selling point of Parcel though is that it offers a zero configuration experience. This means all the features are available out of the box! It also boasts blazing fast bundle times 👟 You won’t be configuring how Parcel works or having to draft in various plugins to get started. If you do need something, Parcel magically detects this and will pull in stuff for you on the fly 😎
Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind
Parcel has made their own benchmarks of Parcel and other bundlers. Parcel has been criticized because they have not made the benchmarks open source. People cannot verify that the benchmarks are true when they are not open source.

Do you know an article comparing Parcel to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.

Suggest an article

Generic Parcel discussion

Log in or Post with

This is an informative page about Parcel. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.