Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Zypper VS Ninja Build

Compare Zypper VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences

SmartWindows.app
Auto arrange all your app windows, whether on one screen or many with a single click! featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Zypper logo Zypper

Zypper is a command line package manager for openSUSE which makes use of libzypp.

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.
  • Zypper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-18
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14

Zypper videos

+ Add

"openSUSE" - the power of 'zypper'...

More videos:

  • Review - Package Manager Zypper di openSUSE | Basic | Beginner Friendly
  • Review - suse zypper

Ninja Build videos

+ Add

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Zypper and Ninja Build)

Zypper

Ninja Build

Front End Package Manager
12 12%
Front End Package Manager
88% 88
Package Manager
100 100%
Package Manager
0% 0
JavaScript Package Manager
6 6%
JavaScript Package Manager
94% 94
Windows Tools
100 100%
Windows Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Zypper and Ninja Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Zypper mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Zypper yet. Tracking of Zypper recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 11 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Zypper and Ninja Build, you can also consider the following products

Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

YUM Package Manager - Yum is an automatic updater and package installer/remover for rpm systems.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

NixOS - 25 Jun 2014 . All software components in NixOS are installed using the Nix package manager. Packages in Nix are defined using the nix language to create nix expressions.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Loading...