Zuul VS Octopus Deploy

Zuul (https://zuul-ci.org ) is specifically built for this use case. It was originally designed for OpenStack's CI, with OpenStack being broken down in multiple inter-dependent repos. Source: 5 months ago

If you’re already using gerrit I would strongly recommend looking at Zuul https://zuul-ci.org. Source: 10 months ago

Zuul (code) helps your team stop merging broken code -- the best kind of gatekeeping. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

I wanted to share a package that I have created, and use, to interface the Zuul CI from Emacs. It offers completion for builds or buildsets, and implements a zuul-log-mode to browse the remote logs. Source: almost 2 years ago

Yay, yet another proprietary Zuul clone! 😶. Source: almost 2 years ago

Check https://raygun.com/blog/top-php-frameworks/ I think you provided not a lot of details so don't expect much. I think you might be mixing https://octopus.com/ with other things. Source: 10 months ago

We use Octopus for our deployments (not only k8s, but pretty much every application we have). It might be too powerful (and expensive) for your needs, but I don't think there is a better tool for any kind of application deployment out there (and if you know of one, especially a cheaper one, please let me know ;-) ). Source: about 1 year ago

Not open source, but there is also https://octopus.com/ which has a free self-hosted version. It's meant to be a deploy tool, but it has a nice ui for creating/running jobs. They can be scheduled or triggered via other methods. Source: over 1 year ago

At the moment, we are using Octopus Deploy to deploy all of our applications. But with kubernetes, there is such a huge amount of tools to use, so maybe there is stuff out there that can handle our k8s deployments even better. Source: over 1 year ago

Take a look at Octopus Deploy. You can create run books pipelines and even rollbacks plans. Source: over 1 year ago