Software Alternatives & Reviews

zrok VS localhost.run

Compare zrok VS localhost.run and see what are their differences

zrok logo zrok

Next-generation sharing platform built on top of OpenZiti

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!
  • zrok Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-09
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to zrok and localhost.run)
Localhost Tools
37 37%
63% 63
Testing
40 40%
60% 60
Webhooks
36 36%
64% 64
VPN
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using zrok and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare zrok and localhost.run

zrok Reviews

We have no reviews of zrok yet.
Be the first one to post

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, zrok should be more popular than localhost.run. It has been mentiond 73 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

zrok mentions (73)

  • List of ngrok/Cloudflare Tunnel alternatives and other tunneling software and services. Focus on self-hosting.
    Zrok - Aims for effortless sharing both publicly and privately. Supports multiple types of resources, including HTTP endpoints and files. Built on OpenZiti (see overlay section below). Apache 2 License. Written in Go. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
  • Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
    Have you tried https://zrok.io/? Its open source so you can self-host with custom domains, has a free SaaS incl. Reserved shares which give static, vanity URLs, and includes internet hardening/auth. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
    Also https://zrok.io/. Its open source, and has a free SaaS. Its also more comprehensive than Tunnelmore, e.g., supporting TCP or UDP tunnels. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Bluesky announces data federation for self hosters
    Another option is using zrok - https://zrok.io/. Its open source so you could build it directly into Bluesky and either host the backend yourself or use the zrok free SaaS. Zrok also has SDKs so you could embed the capability directly into your binaries without having a separate agent. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Ask HN: What new shell tools have recently excited you?
    Not so much a shell tool, just a tool that one controls with the shell, but https://zrok.io/ really is amazing. It can serve the purpose of ngrok making local stuff accessible globally, but with a really cool open distributed backend system. Bluetuith looks amazing although I haven't tried it yet or had a use case. But it should be fantastic for setting up Bluetooth on a raspberry pi. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
View more

localhost.run mentions (41)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing zrok and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products

Pinggy.io - Public URLs for localhost without downloading any binary

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Portmap.io - Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

Headscale - An open source, self-hosted implementation of the Tailscale control server

LocalXpose - Bye Bye Localhost, Hello World!

LocaltoNet - Expose localhost to the internet with a public URL