Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

zrok VS Adobe Fill & Sign

Compare zrok VS Adobe Fill & Sign and see what are their differences

Docubee
Intelligent Contract Automation featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

zrok logo zrok

Next-generation sharing platform built on top of OpenZiti

Adobe Fill & Sign logo Adobe Fill & Sign

Fill and sign any form, even snap a picture of a paper form to fill out.
  • zrok Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-09
  • Adobe Fill & Sign Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-15

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to zrok and Adobe Fill & Sign)

zrok

Adobe Fill & Sign

Localhost Tools
100 100%
Localhost Tools
0% 0
eSignature
0 0%
eSignature
100% 100
Testing
100 100%
Testing
0% 0
Document Automation
0 0%
Document Automation
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using zrok and Adobe Fill & Sign. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, zrok seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 74 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

zrok mentions (74)

  • Show HN: Pico: An open-source Ngrok alternative built for production traffic
    Mispelling, zrok - https://zrok.io/. Its open source and has a free SaaS (or paid if you want). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • List of ngrok/Cloudflare Tunnel alternatives and other tunneling software and services. Focus on self-hosting.
    Zrok - Aims for effortless sharing both publicly and privately. Supports multiple types of resources, including HTTP endpoints and files. Built on OpenZiti (see overlay section below). Apache 2 License. Written in Go. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
    Have you tried https://zrok.io/? Its open source so you can self-host with custom domains, has a free SaaS incl. Reserved shares which give static, vanity URLs, and includes internet hardening/auth. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
    Also https://zrok.io/. Its open source, and has a free SaaS. Its also more comprehensive than Tunnelmore, e.g., supporting TCP or UDP tunnels. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Bluesky announces data federation for self hosters
    Another option is using zrok - https://zrok.io/. Its open source so you could build it directly into Bluesky and either host the backend yourself or use the zrok free SaaS. Zrok also has SDKs so you could embed the capability directly into your binaries without having a separate agent. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
View more

Adobe Fill & Sign mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Adobe Fill & Sign yet. Tracking of Adobe Fill & Sign recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing zrok and Adobe Fill & Sign, you can also consider the following products

Pinggy.io - Public URLs for localhost without downloading any binary

DottedSign - The Best E-Signature Solution for Your Business

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

PandaDoc - Boost your revenue with PandaDoc. A document automation tool that delivers higher close rates and shorter sales cycles. We've helped over 30,000+ companies.

Headscale - An open source, self-hosted implementation of the Tailscale control server

LibreSign - O LibreSign (assinatura eletrônica) permite que documentos sejam assinados de forma segura e com validade jurídica.

Loading...