Zero Install VS OneGet

Zero Install

Zero Install is a decentralised cross-distribution software installation system.

OneGet

OneGet is a unified interface to package management systems and aims to make Software Discovery...

Landing page //
2021-07-26

Landing page //
2023-10-11

Zero Installation Purifier Reverse Osmosis Unboxing - Demo - Review

OneGet videos

No OneGet videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Zero Install and OneGet)

OneGet

Software Marketplace

63 63%

Software Marketplace

37% 37

Windows Tools

0 0%

Windows Tools

100% 100

OS & Utilities

100 100%

OS & Utilities

0% 0

Package Manager

0 0%

Package Manager

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Zero Install and OneGet. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Zero Install and OneGet

Zero Install Reviews

We have no reviews of Zero Install yet.
Be the first one to post

OneGet Reviews

6 Best Windows Package Manager to Auto-Update Apps (2020)

Let’s start with PackageManagement, formerly known as OneGet. I really liked the old name OneGet so let us just pretend it is not renamed. It comes built into Powershell Version 2.0 though it’s not the official package manager. It’s still in the early phases but Windows would start pushing it sooner or later. It downloads the packages from repositories like Powershell...

Source: techwiser.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Zero Install should be more popular than OneGet. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Zero Install mentions (4)

Using jlink to cross-compile minimal JREs
Sounds like https://0install.net which has been around for a while. Personally I prefer to avoid 'installing' anything: if something's written in Java, its launcher should reference some specific java binary; if something's written in Python, it should reference some specific python3 binary; etc. For example, my job is mostly writing Scala and building it with Maven; yet I have neither installed system-wide.... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Go binding for upx utility
It seems more like a package manager. https://0install.net/. Source: over 1 year ago
Ubuntu's Snap performs application updates without user consent
The article mentions Snap, AppImage and FlatPak, but there is also a much older system called 0install (zero install) that was started in 2003 or so [1]. I wonder why that never took off. [1] https://zero-install.sourceforge.net/roadmap.html (note this is the old website; the new website is https://0install.net - looks like it's still getting releases in October this year). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Flaptak (and Snap) is not the future
That's true, future app distributions should utilize web 3.0, e.g. decentralization. There is 0install ( https://0install.net/ ), for example, it is better. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

OneGet mentions (1)

just got a new laptop i don't know what's the important apps to install?
Chocolatey can only manage things installed by Chocolatey. If you use Powershell's PackageManagement functionality (which is a "package manager manager") then you can integrate Chocolatey with a handful of other (also usually nuget-based) package managers, but you're still fundamentally limited to "can only manage what was installed by the manager" behavior. Source: almost 2 years ago