Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

yuniql VS SQL Source Control

Compare yuniql VS SQL Source Control and see what are their differences

yuniql logo yuniql

Free and open source schema versioning and migration tool made with .NET Core. Plain SQL, arrange versions in ordinary folders and seed your data from CSV via stand-alone CLI (no CLR needed), Azure Pipelines, Docker or ASP.NET Core code.

SQL Source Control logo SQL Source Control

Source control schemas and reference data, roll back changes, and maintain the referential...
  • yuniql Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-10-01
  • SQL Source Control Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-04

yuniql features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Yuniql provides a simple and intuitive command-line interface that is easy to learn and use. It allows developers to manage database migrations with minimal setup and configuration.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Yuniql supports multiple database platforms such as SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, and others, making it versatile and adaptable to different environments.
  • Zero-dependency Approach
    Yuniql does not require additional frameworks or runtime dependencies. It can run directly as a CLI tool, which simplifies deployment and reduces potential compatibility issues.
  • Version Control Integration
    Supports integration with version control systems by allowing developers to store migration scripts alongside the application code, ensuring consistency and traceability.
  • Idempotency
    Yuniql ensures that database changes are idempotent, meaning the same migration script can be run multiple times without adverse effects, ensuring safe and consistent database states.

Possible disadvantages of yuniql

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more established tools, Yuniql's ecosystem of plugins and community support is relatively limited, which might restrict advanced use cases or integrations.
  • Community and Documentation
    Yuniql, being a newer tool, may not have as extensive documentation or community support as other well-established database migration tools, potentially increasing the learning curve for complex scenarios.
  • Advanced Features
    While Yuniql covers the basics of database migrations well, it might lack some advanced features that other mature tools provide, such as complex rollback mechanisms or seed data management.
  • Release Frequency
    The frequency of updates and new features might not be as rapid as older tools, which could result in slower adoption of new technologies or practices.
  • User Interface
    Yuniql primarily offers a CLI interface. Those looking for a GUI may find it less accessible compared to tools that offer a visual interface for managing migrations.

SQL Source Control features and specs

  • Integration with Version Control Systems
    SQL Source Control integrates seamlessly with various version control systems such as Git, SVN, and TFS, allowing for streamlined management of database versions alongside application code.
  • Developers Efficiency
    Developers can link their databases directly to source control without leaving SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS), which increases efficiency and reduces context switching.
  • Change Tracking
    It provides robust change tracking and visibility, allowing teams to see who made changes to the database schema and when, improving accountability and traceability.
  • Version History
    SQL Source Control allows for easy viewing of version history and rollback to previous versions, which is invaluable for auditing and recovering from changes that introduce issues.
  • Collaboration
    Enables better collaboration among team members by allowing them to easily share and synch changes, minimizing conflicts and ensuring everyone is working from the latest version.

Possible disadvantages of SQL Source Control

  • Cost
    SQL Source Control is a commercial product, which can be costly for small teams or organizations with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    There can be a learning curve associated with setting up and using SQL Source Control effectively, especially for teams that are new to source control for databases.
  • Performance Impact
    Some users may experience performance slowdowns within SQL Server Management Studio, especially when working with large databases or complex schema structures.
  • Limited Offline Work
    While changes can be made offline, full functionality and synchronicity require a connection, which might limit flexibility in environments with unstable internet connections.
  • Complexity in Large Projects
    Managing very large database schemas or numerous simultaneous changes can become complex and might require strategy and planning to handle effectively within SQL Source Control.

yuniql videos

No yuniql videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

SQL Source Control videos

Redgate SQL Source Control - an intro with Steve Jones

More videos:

  • Review - SQL Source Control and VSCode: Handling Git Conflicts

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to yuniql and SQL Source Control)
Databases
53 53%
47% 47
MySQL Tools
52 52%
48% 48
Database Management
51 51%
49% 49
Productivity
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using yuniql and SQL Source Control. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing yuniql and SQL Source Control, you can also consider the following products

Flyway - Flyway is a database migration tool.

Liquibase - Database schema change management and release automation solution.

gitSQL - Database source control for SQL Server, PostgreSQL

Evolve (database migration) - Database migration tool for .NET and .NET Core. Inspired by Flyway.

ApexSQL Source Control - SQL source control - Seamlessly integrate SQL source control with SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS)

VersionSQL - VersionSQL checks your database code into source control from within SQL Server Management Studio.