WYSIWYG Web Builder VS QuickJS

WYSIWYG Web Builder mentions (0)

QuickJS mentions (35)

• AWS Introduces a New JavaScript Runtime for Lambda

  QuickJS is well known and has been around for a while: https://bellard.org/quickjs/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

• Ask HN: C/C++ plugin make JavaScipt end up with C/C++ binary?

  Just go with quickjs, I think this is what you are looking for. https://bellard.org/quickjs/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

• New QuickJS Release

  There is a readme on the project's main page: https://bellard.org/quickjs/ The newsworthy bit here is that the activity seemed to have stalled for year or two and now Fabrice pushed a few fixes and made a new release. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• WinterJS

  > I am still confused, it's a JavaScript runtime intended to be deployed to JavaScript/Wasm runtimes? Seemingly. > Why does a JavaScript runtime need a JavaScript runtime? Because if you want to create a Service Worker server for CloudFlare Workers and other JavaScript/Wasm runtimes, that's the only option for doing that AFAIK. FWIW, this isn't a new idea. For example, Figma uses QuickJS... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• The JavaScript Ecosystem Is Delightfully Weird

  I started writing a small static site generator for myself using JavaScript and QuickJS by Fabrice Bellard[1]. QuickJS is not quite complete, and there are some cross-platform inconsistencies, but overall I found it pleasant to use and its libc wrappers to be powerful enough. I also found that JavaScript is actually pleasant to use when I'm not using classes, or dealing with metaprogramming/Babel, or implicit... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago