Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

wxWidgets VS Webapp Manager

Compare wxWidgets VS Webapp Manager and see what are their differences

wxWidgets logo wxWidgets

wxWidgets: Cross-Platform GUI Library

Webapp Manager logo Webapp Manager

Run websites as if they were apps
  • wxWidgets Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-21
  • Webapp Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-13

wxWidgets features and specs

  • Cross-Platform
    wxWidgets allows developers to create applications that run on different platforms such as Windows, macOS, Linux, and more, without changing the codebase.
  • Native Look and Feel
    It provides a native look and feel on each platform by using the native GUI components, making applications appear more integrated with the host OS.
  • Wide Range of Widgets
    wxWidgets offers a rich set of widgets and controls, supporting complex interfaces and various types of user interactions.
  • Extensive Documentation
    The library is well-documented, with numerous tutorials, guides, and an active community to help developers troubleshoot and expand their understanding.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, wxWidgets provides the flexibility to customize and modify the library to better fit specific needs without licensing costs.

Possible disadvantages of wxWidgets

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and the complexity of configuring UI components, new users may find it challenging to learn and utilize effectively.
  • Large Binary Size
    Applications built with wxWidgets can become quite large, which might be a drawback for developers focusing on lightweight applications.
  • Platform-Specific Bugs
    Since wxWidgets aims to provide native components for each platform, sometimes this leads to platform-specific bugs that can complicate cross-platform consistency.
  • Limited Modern Features
    While wxWidgets is robust, it might lack some of the modern, cutting-edge features found in newer libraries and frameworks in terms of design and ease of use.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies for different platforms can be cumbersome, requiring additional effort in the build and deployment processes.

Webapp Manager features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Webapp Manager provides a simple interface to convert web apps into desktop applications, making it user-friendly even for those with limited technical knowledge.
  • Integration
    Allows web apps to integrate more seamlessly into the desktop environment, providing features like windowed mode and launching directly from the main application menu.
  • Organization
    Enables better organization of web applications, separating them from typical browser tabs and giving each a designated space.
  • Resource Efficiency
    Running web apps in isolation can be more resource-efficient compared to having multiple tabs open in a full browser, potentially reducing system load.

Possible disadvantages of Webapp Manager

  • Limited Functionality
    Some complex web applications may not perform as well or have limited functionality when run through a web application manager compared to a full-featured browser.
  • Dependency on AUR
    Since this package is available via AUR, users must manage potential risks associated with using unofficial or community-maintained repositories.
  • Feature Parity
    Not all features available in modern browsers (such as extensions or developer tools) may be accessible within the Webapp Manager environment.
  • Potential for Bugs
    As with any third-party tool, there could be bugs or stability issues, especially with updates or changes to web technologies or desktop environments.

wxWidgets videos

Cross Platform Graphical User Interfaces in C++

More videos:

  • Demo - More Cross Platform Graphical User Interfaces in C++: Custom Controls

Webapp Manager videos

No Webapp Manager videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to wxWidgets and Webapp Manager)
Development Tools
84 84%
16% 16
Rapid Application Development
Group Chat & Notifications
Cross-Platform Development

User comments

Share your experience with using wxWidgets and Webapp Manager. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, wxWidgets should be more popular than Webapp Manager. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

wxWidgets mentions (8)

  • What do you think about using a game engine for UI?
    In general, people must make a choice between portability, and the breadth of optimizations. For multi-platform builds, there are single code-base frameworks available: https://quasar.dev/ For MacOS, Linux Gtk, and Windows native builds there are mature free libraries that allow both FOSS and commercial static linking: https://wxwidgets.org/ Game engines are designed to solve a single set of use-cases for... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Understanding the Layout Process in Qt Widgets
    Why do your prefer it over https://wxwidgets.org given the licenses? Personally, I was keen on Qt right up to the 5.x change over. =3. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Building KiCad 6.0.11 from source - wxWidgets problem
    I decided to compile from scratch the latest wxWidgets from wxwidgets.org. And I compiled and installed successfully for both X11 and GTK. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Tic tac toe ine c++ ?
    Some say qt, others wxwidgets, u++, sfml, here is a video from quick search on wxwidgets and c++ for beginners https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOIbK4bJKS8 Choosethem depending on learning curve and where they will take you, you might learn something harder because it takes you farther to where you want to go. Source: over 2 years ago
  • The Decline and Fall of Java on the Desktop Part 1 (1999-2005)
    > Java Swing still lets you make native-looking-and-feeling apps (with some care). I don't know of any new GUI frameworks that let you do the same. That's the whole raison d'être of the (C++) wxWidgets toolkit. [0] It fully commits to using native GUI widgets, rather than impersonating them. (That is, it wraps various other toolkits.) As others have pointed out, the other major cross-platform toolkits (Qt, GTK)... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
View more

Webapp Manager mentions (3)

  • Native PWA Support
    I just install Linux Mint's WebApp Manager. Its a simple python program that does what you're looking for and its in the AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/webapp-manager. Source: about 3 years ago
  • whatsaap-web-desktop
    If you only use firefox you can install this (yay -S webapp-manager) web app manager that can create a web app for any site with firefox. Since whatsapp is a simple app you should be good. Source: about 3 years ago
  • How can I split Discord into two processes in the panel?
    Here's another alternative: use the webapp client for discord. I use webapp-manager for many web apps. You could create multiple webapps running different discord accounts. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing wxWidgets and Webapp Manager, you can also consider the following products

Qt - Powerful, flexible and easy to use, Qt will help you not only meet your tight deadline, but also reduce the maintainable code by an astonishing percentage.

Native Alpha - Native Alpha lets you create full screen Web Apps with shortcuts and custom settings.

GTK - GTK+ is a multi-platform toolkit for creating graphical user interfaces.

Fluid - Turn Your Favorite Web Apps into Real Mac Apps.

PyQt - Riverbank | Software | PyQt | What is PyQt?

WebCatalog - Run your favorite web apps natively