Software Alternatives & Reviews

WWChat VS Molly (Signal fork)

Compare WWChat VS Molly (Signal fork) and see what are their differences

WWChat logo WWChat

Indie Chat / Messenger for Android

Molly (Signal fork) logo Molly (Signal fork)

Molly is an independent Signal fork for Android
  • WWChat Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01
  • Molly (Signal fork) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-12

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WWChat and Molly (Signal fork))
Communication
19 19%
81% 81
Group Chat & Notifications
Social & Communications
24 24%
76% 76
Instant Messaging
16 16%
84% 84

User comments

Share your experience with using WWChat and Molly (Signal fork). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Molly (Signal fork) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 30 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WWChat mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WWChat yet. Tracking of WWChat recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Molly (Signal fork) mentions (30)

  • What were your less than ideal experiences with GrapheneOS?
    Check out https://molly.im/. It's a hardened Signal fork with one version stripping the google dependencies out of it. Push notifications work flawlessly even with battery optimization enabled. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Signal Removes SMS - Any Recommendations?
    The one benefit is that we now have no reason NOT to use Molly (the hardened version of Signal). Previously I didn't just because of sms. https://molly.im/. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Why does Signal discourage downloading the apk directly?
    Hi, you can add the repository in fdroid of a fork of signal, Molly Molly , you have a FOSS version. Source: about 1 year ago
  • ‘I will show you how safe Telegram is’
    Signal uses Curve25519, AES-256, and HMAC-SHA256 for its e2e encryption. So unless you believe those algorithms are insecure, there's no reason to think that their server setup is a compromise on your messages' security. Fear of "future decryption" applies equally to all forms of encrypted communication, regardless of which servers the messages go through. And since AES-256 is known to resist quantum computing... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Re-Adding SMS Support to Signal
    I don't know if they are technically allowed but https://molly.im exists. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WWChat and Molly (Signal fork), you can also consider the following products

FluffyChat - Open. Nonprofit. Cute ?

aTalk - An encrypted instant messaging with video call and GPS features for android.

Olvid - The most secure messaging app in the world.

Talk360 - Talk360 is a best-in-class communication utility that offers a convenient way to connect with loved ones globally.

TeleGuard - TeleGuard is a secure messenger that makes it store that your data or chats are not stored while collaborating or communicating with partners and friends.

Mi Airit - Mi Airit a chat app that helps you communicate messages to the right people without receiving unwanted responses or reactions.