Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Wurm Online VS Buck

Compare Wurm Online VS Buck and see what are their differences

craftlands.host
Powerful, fast, and budget-friendly game server hosting for Minecraft, Rust and more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Wurm Online logo Wurm Online

Wurm Online is the MMORPG where the players are in charge! Developed around the idea of player-influence it stands as one of the only, true Sandbox MMOs.

Buck logo Buck

A high-performance build tool for Android by Facebook
  • Wurm Online Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-29
  • Buck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-29

Wurm Online features and specs

  • Immersive World
    Wurm Online offers a vast, open world with a high level of detail, providing players with an immersive experience where they can shape and influence the environment extensively.
  • Community-Driven
    The game has a strong, dedicated community which enhances the social aspect of the game through collaboration and interaction among players.
  • Deep Crafting System
    Wurm Online features an intricate crafting system that allows for a wide range of items and building structures, catering to players who enjoy detailed crafting mechanics.
  • Freedom of Playstyle
    Players have the freedom to choose their own path, whether it's building, crafting, exploring, or engaging in PvP, allowing for diverse gameplay experiences.
  • Player-Driven Economy
    The game has an economy driven by players themselves, giving it a dynamic and realistic market where players can trade goods and services.

Possible disadvantages of Wurm Online

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Wurm Online has a steep learning curve, which may be daunting for new players who might find it challenging to understand the various game mechanics and systems.
  • Time-Consuming
    Building and crafting in the game can be very time-consuming, requiring a significant investment of time to achieve substantial progress or significant creations.
  • Dated Graphics
    The graphics of Wurm Online are often considered outdated compared to modern standards, which might affect the visual appeal for players focused on aesthetics.
  • Slow Pace
    The gameplay is generally slow-paced, which may not be appealing to players looking for quick action or fast progression.
  • Subscription-Based
    While the game offers a free-to-play option, many features and content are locked behind a subscription, which may not be appealing to all players.

Buck features and specs

  • Speed
    Buck's advanced dependency graph management allows for fast incremental builds, which can significantly reduce build times compared to other build tools.
  • Deterministic Builds
    Buck ensures that the same input will always produce the same output, which enhances the reliability and consistency across different environments.
  • Reproducibility
    With Buck, you can build the same output from the same source code, ensuring greater confidence in the software you are shipping.
  • Fine-Grained Build Targets
    Buck offers fine-grained control over build rules, which can lead to more efficient builds by minimizing the amount of work needed when small changes are made.
  • Multi-Language Support
    Buck supports multiple programming languages and platforms, making it versatile for diverse project environments.
  • Remote Build Execution
    Buck supports remote build execution, which can speed up the build process by offloading tasks to more powerful servers or distributed environments.

Possible disadvantages of Buck

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The complexity and variety of features in Buck can make it difficult for new users to learn and adopt, especially for those accustomed to simpler build systems.
  • Sparse Documentation
    While there is some documentation available, it can be sparse, and users might struggle to find examples or community support for advanced usage.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more established build tools like Maven or Gradle, Buck has a smaller ecosystem of plugins and extensions, which might limit its adaptability for certain projects.
  • Metadata Overhead
    Buck requires the maintenance of a considerable amount of metadata and configuration files, which can increase the complexity of managing large projects.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up Buck and configuring build rules can be complex and time-consuming, requiring a deep understanding of the tool and its intricacies.

Analysis of Buck

Overall verdict

  • Buck is considered a good build system, especially for certain scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Buck was developed by Facebook (now Meta) and is designed to handle large codebases efficiently.
  • It utilizes a build graph to minimize unnecessary recompilation, which can significantly speed up build times.
  • Supports parallel builds, allowing multiple tasks to be run concurrently, which is ideal for leveraging multi-core processors.
  • Highly configurable and supports incremental builds, improving the speed of the development cycle by compiling only changed files.
  • Open source, which allows the community to contribute to its development and adapt it for various needs.

Recommended for

  • Large-scale projects where build time is a critical factor.
  • Development teams familiar with or already using similar build systems like Bazel.
  • Projects that require a high degree of configurability and custom build rules.
  • Organizations looking for an open-source solution with an active community and ongoing support.

Wurm Online videos

+ Add

Wurm Online Sandbox MMO ► Steam Release Review (Progression, Gameplay Experience)

More videos:

  • Review - Wurm Online MMO Experience Like No Other and Tips for New Players 2020
  • Review - Wurm Online | WTF is Wurm Online?

Buck videos

+ Add

Buck HONEST Operator Review | Rainbow Six Siege

More videos:

  • Review - Unbreakable Pocket Knife Destruction Test - Buck 110 review
  • Review - Buck 110 review after carrying for 9 years

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Wurm Online and Buck)

Wurm Online

Buck

Games
100 100%
Games
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
0 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100
Block-building Games
100 100%
Block-building Games
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Wurm Online and Buck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Wurm Online mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Wurm Online yet. Tracking of Wurm Online recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Buck mentions (9)

  • How to effectively work in big codebases
    Many big companies have built their own tools to reign in this complexity and make it easier and faster for developers to work on large, multi-language code bases. Meta has buck, Amazon has brazil, and Google has bazel. But from my experience, especially, with brazil, these tools also have some rough edges, so understanding how they work can go a long way. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Compiling a single-file app with csc.dll
    We use Buck company wide. Our packaging / deployment system, for example, expects to be given a Buck target to build, not a pre-built binary - I can’t just build my app with dotnet and upload it. While it is possible for a Buck target to be a simple bash command (i.e dotnet publish), doing so makes the target “opaque” - Buck wouldn’t have any knowledge of my app’s build graph so I’d lose many of the benefits it... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Just: A Command Runner
    Oh excellent, then better (and more portable!) tools are available: http://pants.build https://ninja-build.org https://buck.build and, if you hate yourself: https://bazel.build. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Dev Discussions: Everything You Need to Know about Monorepos with Juri Strumpflohner of Nrwl
    Pioneered by tech giants like Google and Meta with tools like Bazel and Buck, monorepos are seeing widespread adoption across companies of all sizes and industries. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Using URLs for dependency management
    Buck has a http_file() that you can use this way, and it has first-class support for Java. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Wurm Online and Buck, you can also consider the following products

Minecraft - A block-building game that allows you to create and explore entire worlds from scratch.

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Terraria - Dig, Fight, Build! The very world is at your fingertips as you fight for survival, fortune, and glory.

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

Terasology - Terasology (started under the name Blockmania) is an open source project started by Benjamin...

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Loading...