WriteFreely VS Sitecake

WriteFreely Reviews

1. Kristina Ponting    

   home at Homewife | over 2 years ago
   I love this:)

   It is siple to use, the words are the center:)

Sitecake Reviews

WriteFreely mentions (33)

• One of the greatest user interface disasters in history

  Mastodon is a microblogging service, so not meant for large bodies of text. This is why the text entry box is small, the columns are somewhat narrow (especially in deck mode) etc. Platforms like https://writefreely.org/ , which are designed to be for blogging and long-form writing, are the place to write this. Write Freely federates so one can follow accounts and interact with posts via Mastodon etc. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Which platform for occasional blog posts?

  An alternative to Plume is WriteFreely, which is a pretty clean & simple experience. Just don't expect to much regarding customization. Source: 11 months ago

• ActivityPub server that can run on Docker with external db?

  And since you've mentioned you want to write a blog, take a look at WriteFreely: https://writefreely.org/. Source: 12 months ago

• Writefreely

  I'm not sure what you've tried to install, but WriteFreely is Open Source and thus free of charge. There is commercial hosting of it, eg. write.as, but with those you don't have to worry about installing it. Source: about 1 year ago

• Newbie Question

  Instead of joining a Mastodon server, have you considered joining a write.freely server? Write.freely is a decentralized platform for writers that integrates the ActivityPub protocol, so anyone in the Fediverse can interact with your posts. This may be more well suited for your needs, although if you still want to join a Mastodon server there are many good answers in this thread. Source: about 1 year ago

Sitecake mentions (5)

• Maintaining this site fucking sucks

  Use something like this? CMS that generates static html? https://sitecake.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Publii: Open-source local WYSIWYG static site CMS

  I think that user experience of website builders with wysiwyg and drag and drop UX won over time. Then, as time passed by, website builders become bloated and complex. Once again you needed a professional to maintain your site in site builder. So now simple solutions, static HTML, free or one-time fee CMSs are sexy again. (economy is not good, who wants another subscription?) I know because 14 years ago we have... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Best solution that would give clients the ability to edit content on their extremely minimal/simple site?

  Https://sitecake.com/ works with simple html and PHP sites.... Veeeerrrry simple for client edits. Source: over 2 years ago

• Conventional approach to allowing business owner to edit static site?

  May be a suitable use case for https://sitecake.com/. Source: over 2 years ago

• Do you know any No-Code CMS or Data-Base for self-hosted Webflow Sites?

  Other than that: Inline Editing CMS examples: Coast CMS, all you need to do is make the html editable with some classes and you're done. The CMS is kind of outdated though. Other examples: simplyedit.io, surrealcms.com, jocms.net, inlinecms.com, sitecake.com. Source: about 3 years ago