Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Workflow by Loom VS Pathfix

Compare Workflow by Loom VS Pathfix and see what are their differences

Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Workflow by Loom logo Workflow by Loom

Record & share quick videos. Now with powerful integrations.

Pathfix logo Pathfix

The easiest way to add integrations to your SaaS
  • Workflow by Loom Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26
  • Pathfix Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-11

Workflow by Loom features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Workflow by Loom offers a user-friendly interface that allows users to create video content quickly, which is ideal for teams looking to streamline their communication and training processes.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The platform supports a wide range of integrations, making it easier to incorporate into existing workflows and enhance productivity by connecting with tools like Slack, Google Workspace, and more.
  • Asynchronous Communication
    Enables teams to communicate effectively without the need for real-time meetings, allowing flexibility for remote or distributed teams to engage at their own pace.
  • Engagement Features
    Provides features such as reaction emojis and time-stamped comments, helping to increase viewer engagement and enable more interactive feedback on shared content.

Possible disadvantages of Workflow by Loom

  • Video Length Limitations
    Free tier users are limited by the duration of videos they can create, which may not be suitable for all use cases that require longer recording times.
  • Storage Constraints
    Users on lower-tier subscriptions face limitations on video storage, which could be a problem for organizations needing to store and manage extensive video libraries.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    Effective use of the platform requires a stable internet connection, which might hinder accessibility in regions with unreliable internet services.
  • Limited Editing Features
    The built-in video editing features are somewhat basic, which could necessitate the use of third-party tools for more advanced editing requirements.

Pathfix features and specs

  • Ease of Integration
    Pathfix simplifies the integration of third-party APIs, allowing developers to easily connect applications with minimal coding.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to handle various scales of operations, accommodating growth in user base and service demands.
  • Security
    Offers enhanced security features that protect data and ensure secure API connections, maintaining the integrity of the systems involved.
  • Time-saving
    Reduces the time required for developing and maintaining custom API connections, freeing up resources for other development tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Pathfix

  • Learning Curve
    Although it simplifies API integrations, there may still be a learning curve for developers unfamiliar with the platform’s architecture.
  • Cost
    There could be costs associated with using Pathfix services, which might be a concern for small businesses or indie developers with limited budgets.
  • Dependency
    Relying on a third-party service for crucial components of your app might introduce risks should their service become unavailable or less reliable.
  • Customization Limitations
    Utilizing a generic integration solution might limit the ability to customize connections for specific or niche use cases.

Workflow by Loom videos

No Workflow by Loom videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Pathfix videos

+ Add

Pathfix Slack App Integration Explained (Instant Oauth) | PitchGround

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Workflow by Loom and Pathfix)

Workflow by Loom

Pathfix

Productivity
64 64%
Productivity
36% 36
Web Service Automation
0 0%
Web Service Automation
100% 100
Video
100 100%
Video
0% 0
SaaS
0 0%
SaaS
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Workflow by Loom and Pathfix. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pathfix seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Workflow by Loom mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Workflow by Loom yet. Tracking of Workflow by Loom recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Pathfix mentions (2)

  • Facebook Marketing API
    Try using Pathfix- it's really easy to get started with and manages most of the access token stuff that is otherwise a royal pain in the behind. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How do you manage users on your API business/product?
    For authorization, have you looked at Pathfix (https://pathfix.com)? I am the founder and am happy to answer any questions regarding user auth and app authorization. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Workflow by Loom and Pathfix, you can also consider the following products

Soapbox by Wistia - Chrome extension to record, edit, and share videos.

hotglue - An embeddable data integration tool for B2B developers built on the Python ecosystem.

Anno by Modfy - Collaboratively annotate any video/audios files, from feedback on songs to detailed product feedback and much more.

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

Relay Videos - Forget meetings. Welcome to bite-sized videos.

Integrations.js - Launch new features at the click of a button.

Loading...