Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

WireGuard VS SSHFS-Win

Compare WireGuard VS SSHFS-Win and see what are their differences

Setuply
Setuply: Transform Clients into Brand Advocates. An AI-powered, purpose-built platform for client onboarding and lifecycle management, helping B2B teams accelerate revenue recognition, boost retention, and scale operations with confidence. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

WireGuard logo WireGuard

Fast, Modern, Secure VPN Tunnel

SSHFS-Win logo SSHFS-Win

SSHFS-Win is a minimal port of SSHFS to Windows.
  • WireGuard Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-24
  • SSHFS-Win Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

WireGuard features and specs

  • Simplicity
    WireGuard is noted for its simplicity in terms of codebase and configuration, making it easier to understand, audit, and maintain.
  • Performance
    WireGuard offers high performance, low latency, and minimal overhead, which results in faster connections compared to other VPN protocols.
  • Security
    WireGuard uses state-of-the-art cryptographic protocols and algorithms, providing a high level of security.
  • Cross-Platform
    WireGuard is compatible with many operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android.
  • Modern Design
    Designed with modern networking use-cases in mind, WireGuard supports advanced features like roaming and easier NAT traversal.
  • Efficient Codebase
    With approximately 4,000 lines of code, WireGuard's minimalism reduces the attack surface and potential for vulnerabilities.

Possible disadvantages of WireGuard

  • Limited Features
    WireGuard primarily focuses on being a secure VPN protocol and lacks some advanced features found in other protocols.
  • Still Evolving
    As a relatively new technology, WireGuard may still undergo significant changes and improvements, which could impact stability and support.
  • Static IP Assignment
    WireGuard assigns static IP addresses to each peer, which can be less flexible compared to dynamic IP allocation in other VPN solutions.
  • Server Compatibility
    Some legacy infrastructures and older systems may not support WireGuard natively, creating challenges for widespread deployment.
  • No Built-in Authentication
    WireGuard itself does not include built-in authentication mechanisms, relying solely on public key cryptography for peer identification.
  • No Built-in Traffic Obfuscation
    WireGuard lacks built-in mechanisms for traffic obfuscation, making it easier for restrictive networks to detect and block WireGuard traffic.

SSHFS-Win features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    SSHFS-Win allows users to mount remote file systems using SSH, which is inherently cross-platform, enabling integration with various operating systems.
  • Secure Communication
    SSHFS-Win benefits from the security of SSH, ensuring that data in transit is encrypted, which enhances security when accessing remote files.
  • User-Friendly
    The tool provides a straightforward way to mount remote file systems as local drives on Windows, making it easy for users who are familiar with the Windows interface.
  • Open Source
    SSHFS-Win is open source, allowing for transparency, community contributions, and the ability for users to adapt the tool to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of SSHFS-Win

  • Performance Overhead
    The use of SSHFS may introduce latency and performance overhead, especially when dealing with large files or high-speed requirements.
  • Windows-Specific Issues
    As a tool bridging SSHFS and Windows, users might encounter compatibility issues specific to certain Windows versions or configurations.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to full-fledged network file systems, SSHFS-Win might lack some advanced features and integrations that organizations might require.
  • Dependency on Network
    Since SSHFS-Win operates over a network connection, it is dependent on the constant availability and reliability of the network.

WireGuard videos

+ Add

WireGuard Overview

More videos:

  • Review - What is WireGuard? Should You Use it? Best VPN for WireGuard?
  • Review - OpenVPN vs WireGuard vs IKEv2 vs PPTP - Which is the Best VPN Protocol to use in 2020?

SSHFS-Win videos

+ Add

A Review Based Tutorial Of SSHFS-WIN, Mapping A SSHFS Network Drive On Windows 10

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WireGuard and SSHFS-Win)

WireGuard

SSHFS-Win

VPN
100 100%
VPN
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
Security & Privacy
0% 0
FTP Client
0 0%
FTP Client
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using WireGuard and SSHFS-Win. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare WireGuard and SSHFS-Win

WireGuard Reviews

Best Top 20 OpenVPN Alternatives (Pros and Cons)
Wireguard is a VPN alternative that is under development. Yet it is faster and carefully designed when compared to other similar products.
Source: cloudinfrastructureservices.co.uk
6 Types of VPN Protocols, Compared: Which is the Best to Use?
In essence, every VPN has to strengthen WireGuard’s wobbly privacy to benefit from its speed and security. That’s why we recommend using WireGuard-based protocols only if they come from reputable VPN providers. NordVPN, for example, fixes WireGuard’s privacy issues with the so-called “double NAT system” (network address translation). This allows them to establish secure...
Source: vpnoverview.com
OpenVPN vs WireGuard: Which protocol is best?
WireGuard was not designed to obfuscate user traffic to this degree, and only supports UDP. This means that a simple, standalone WireGuard connection is easy to detect. However, as WireGuard is so extensible, most VPN providers have added their own obfuscation methods on top. The efficacy of these varies, but we’ve seen services with WireGuard support that even work in...
Source: www.comparitech.com
The 10 Best Open Source VPN Apps
In addition to using the latest encryption techniques, Mullvad is based on some of the VPN protocols in WireGuard and OpenVPN. So, users will be able to decide for themselves which VPN client to opt for. Also, you can find Mullvad on Windows, macOS, and Linux-based systems, as well as Android and iOS. There is no paid version of Mullvad, either, so you need not worry about...
Source: www.fosslinux.com
WireGuard vs OpenVPN
WireGuard was designed for speed and security. It was not specifically designed for people like us, who look to their VPN service for both security and privacy. However, in order to give users the benefits of WireGuard, VPN services have come up with WireGuard solutions that add strong privacy protections without sacrificing what makes WireGuard special. Here’s the problem:
Source: restoreprivacy.com

SSHFS-Win Reviews

We have no reviews of SSHFS-Win yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SSHFS-Win should be more popular than WireGuard. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WireGuard mentions (9)

  • Remote access from work/corporate network
    Wireguard. Wireguard uses UDP only and runs TCP sockets over UDP. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Central reverse-proxy ssh access?
    Look at Wireguard. I know you don't want Yet Another VPN running alongside your IPSec, but it's less VPN and more encrypted point-to-point UDP. You can set it up on any port you wish, including common ports that might be open on an outbound smart firewall not doing deep packet inspection. That way, it can stay out of the way of your existing IPSec deployment. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Official /r/rust "Who's Hiring" thread for job-seekers and job-offerers [Rust 1.69]
    We use Elixir/Erlang for our control plane, and Rust for our data plane, built on the excellent WireGuard® tunneling protocol. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Globally distributed Elixir over Tailscale
    Both products are based off Wireguard which is available for all new linux distributions. https://wireguard.com . I'm not saying OP's solution is wrong, just curious what the advantages are. Other than potentially simpler client setup, what are the advantages of paying for tailscale. With the opensource tailscale, I'm not sure if you get access to an api you can use to look up the hosts. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Whisper: wraps any Go io.ReadWriter in a secure tunnel using Ed25519/X25519
    Noise Protocol Framework (used by Wireguard). Source: about 2 years ago
View more

SSHFS-Win mentions (22)

  • Seamlessly Connect Salesforce to an SFTP Server in Multiple Ways
    You can avoid manually uploading and downloading CSV files after an import or export in Salesforce Data Loader. One way to do that is to make your SFTP server a mapped drive in Windows. So, if you map the SFTP server to, let’s say drive Z, you can import or export CSV files from that drive, like it is local to your PC. You can use tools like the open-source SSHFS-Win or a similar tool to make this possible. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • [PRoot-distro-tui-u] took me two days just to add the export function going, at least its working now
    It's a pain actually, the https://github.com/winfsp/sshfs-win really bugged me to hell actually until it finally worked with https://github.com/evsar3/sshfs-win-manager. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • WinFsp · Windows File System Proxy
    Another neat application is SSHFS-Win, from the same authors of WinFsp itself. https://github.com/winfsp/sshfs-win. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • WinFsp · Windows File System Proxy
    I use this along with https://github.com/winfsp/sshfs-win, which allows me to mount ssh filesystems as windows network shares, and it's awfully slow. So slow that when doing operations that involve opening several files (like using git) you want to punch your screen. Anybody knows of an alternative? - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • I am a little in over my head
    3) Installed sshfs-win and connected using the instructions. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WireGuard and SSHFS-Win, you can also consider the following products

OpenVPN - OpenVPN - The Open Source VPN

win-sshfs - Mount a unix server location as a virtual Windows drive

ProtonVPN - ProtonVPN is a security focused FREE VPN service, developed by CERN and MIT scientists. Use the web anonymously, unblock websites & encrypt your connection.

WinFsp - WinFsp, Windows File System Proxy, is a set of software components for Windows computers that...

ZeroTier - Extremely simple P2P Encrypted VPN

WinSCP - WinSCP is an open source free SFTP client and FTP client for Windows.

Loading...