Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WireGuard VS Cisco VPN

Compare WireGuard VS Cisco VPN and see what are their differences

WireGuard logo WireGuard

Fast, Modern, Secure VPN Tunnel

Cisco VPN logo Cisco VPN

Cisco has a high market immersion in corporate and instructive situations, and for a significant portion of you, any experience you’ve had with virtual private systems is through such presentation.
  • WireGuard Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-24
  • Cisco VPN Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-18

WireGuard features and specs

  • Simplicity
    WireGuard is noted for its simplicity in terms of codebase and configuration, making it easier to understand, audit, and maintain.
  • Performance
    WireGuard offers high performance, low latency, and minimal overhead, which results in faster connections compared to other VPN protocols.
  • Security
    WireGuard uses state-of-the-art cryptographic protocols and algorithms, providing a high level of security.
  • Cross-Platform
    WireGuard is compatible with many operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android.
  • Modern Design
    Designed with modern networking use-cases in mind, WireGuard supports advanced features like roaming and easier NAT traversal.
  • Efficient Codebase
    With approximately 4,000 lines of code, WireGuard's minimalism reduces the attack surface and potential for vulnerabilities.

Possible disadvantages of WireGuard

  • Limited Features
    WireGuard primarily focuses on being a secure VPN protocol and lacks some advanced features found in other protocols.
  • Still Evolving
    As a relatively new technology, WireGuard may still undergo significant changes and improvements, which could impact stability and support.
  • Static IP Assignment
    WireGuard assigns static IP addresses to each peer, which can be less flexible compared to dynamic IP allocation in other VPN solutions.
  • Server Compatibility
    Some legacy infrastructures and older systems may not support WireGuard natively, creating challenges for widespread deployment.
  • No Built-in Authentication
    WireGuard itself does not include built-in authentication mechanisms, relying solely on public key cryptography for peer identification.
  • No Built-in Traffic Obfuscation
    WireGuard lacks built-in mechanisms for traffic obfuscation, making it easier for restrictive networks to detect and block WireGuard traffic.

Cisco VPN features and specs

  • Robust Security Features
    Cisco VPN offers comprehensive security features including multi-factor authentication, endpoint posture assessment, and strong encryption protocols, ensuring a secure connection for remote users.
  • Reliable and Stable Connection
    Cisco's AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client provides a stable and consistent VPN connection across various network environments, reducing downtime and improving user productivity.
  • Wide Compatibility
    The VPN client is compatible with a wide range of operating systems including Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS, making it suitable for diverse IT environments.
  • Comprehensive Network Visibility
    Offers extensive network visibility and control through its integration with Cisco's extensive suite of management tools, allowing IT administrators to monitor and manage the network efficiently.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The VPN client has a straightforward and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to connect to their network securely with minimal hassle.

Possible disadvantages of Cisco VPN

  • Cost Considerations
    Cisco VPN solutions can be more expensive compared to other VPN solutions available in the market, which might be a barrier for smaller organizations with limited budgets.
  • Complexity in Setup and Configuration
    Initial setup and configuration of Cisco VPN can be complex and may require experienced IT professionals to ensure optimal system performance, which could be challenging for smaller organizations lacking such resources.
  • Potential Performance Impact
    While providing excellent security, the extensive security features might lead to potential performance impacts, such as slower connection speeds, depending on the network infrastructure.
  • Occasional Compatibility Issues
    There might be occasional compatibility issues with certain network environments or older devices, necessitating additional troubleshooting and support.
  • Resource Intensity
    The client software can be resource-intensive, potentially causing slowdowns on devices with limited hardware capabilities, impacting user experience.

WireGuard videos

WireGuard Overview

More videos:

  • Review - What is WireGuard? Should You Use it? Best VPN for WireGuard?
  • Review - OpenVPN vs WireGuard vs IKEv2 vs PPTP - Which is the Best VPN Protocol to use in 2020?

Cisco VPN videos

No Cisco VPN videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WireGuard and Cisco VPN)
VPN
84 84%
16% 16
Security & Privacy
85 85%
15% 15
Cloud VPN
91 91%
9% 9
Network & Admin
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using WireGuard and Cisco VPN. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare WireGuard and Cisco VPN

WireGuard Reviews

Best Top 20 OpenVPN Alternatives (Pros and Cons)
Wireguard is a VPN alternative that is under development. Yet it is faster and carefully designed when compared to other similar products.
6 Types of VPN Protocols, Compared: Which is the Best to Use?
In essence, every VPN has to strengthen WireGuard’s wobbly privacy to benefit from its speed and security. That’s why we recommend using WireGuard-based protocols only if they come from reputable VPN providers. NordVPN, for example, fixes WireGuard’s privacy issues with the so-called “double NAT system” (network address translation). This allows them to establish secure...
Source: vpnoverview.com
OpenVPN vs WireGuard: Which protocol is best?
WireGuard was not designed to obfuscate user traffic to this degree, and only supports UDP. This means that a simple, standalone WireGuard connection is easy to detect. However, as WireGuard is so extensible, most VPN providers have added their own obfuscation methods on top. The efficacy of these varies, but we’ve seen services with WireGuard support that even work in...
The 10 Best Open Source VPN Apps
In addition to using the latest encryption techniques, Mullvad is based on some of the VPN protocols in WireGuard and OpenVPN. So, users will be able to decide for themselves which VPN client to opt for. Also, you can find Mullvad on Windows, macOS, and Linux-based systems, as well as Android and iOS. There is no paid version of Mullvad, either, so you need not worry about...
WireGuard vs OpenVPN
WireGuard was designed for speed and security. It was not specifically designed for people like us, who look to their VPN service for both security and privacy. However, in order to give users the benefits of WireGuard, VPN services have come up with WireGuard solutions that add strong privacy protections without sacrificing what makes WireGuard special. Here’s the problem:

Cisco VPN Reviews

We have no reviews of Cisco VPN yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WireGuard seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WireGuard mentions (9)

  • Remote access from work/corporate network
    Wireguard. Wireguard uses UDP only and runs TCP sockets over UDP. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Central reverse-proxy ssh access?
    Look at Wireguard. I know you don't want Yet Another VPN running alongside your IPSec, but it's less VPN and more encrypted point-to-point UDP. You can set it up on any port you wish, including common ports that might be open on an outbound smart firewall not doing deep packet inspection. That way, it can stay out of the way of your existing IPSec deployment. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Official /r/rust "Who's Hiring" thread for job-seekers and job-offerers [Rust 1.69]
    We use Elixir/Erlang for our control plane, and Rust for our data plane, built on the excellent WireGuard® tunneling protocol. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Globally distributed Elixir over Tailscale
    Both products are based off Wireguard which is available for all new linux distributions. https://wireguard.com . I'm not saying OP's solution is wrong, just curious what the advantages are. Other than potentially simpler client setup, what are the advantages of paying for tailscale. With the opensource tailscale, I'm not sure if you get access to an api you can use to look up the hosts. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Whisper: wraps any Go io.ReadWriter in a secure tunnel using Ed25519/X25519
    Noise Protocol Framework (used by Wireguard). Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Cisco VPN mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cisco VPN yet. Tracking of Cisco VPN recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WireGuard and Cisco VPN, you can also consider the following products

OpenVPN - OpenVPN - The Open Source VPN

Hamachi - Hamachi is a VPN service scaled to the unique needs of business owners.

ProtonVPN - ProtonVPN is a security focused FREE VPN service, developed by CERN and MIT scientists. Use the web anonymously, unblock websites & encrypt your connection.

ShrewSoft VPN Client - Shrew Soft Inc

ZeroTier - Extremely simple P2P Encrypted VPN

Wippien - Free p2p VPN software - establish personal p2p network with friends from your contact list.‎Downloads · ‎miniVPN · ‎FAQ · ‎Linux version of free p2p VPN .