Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Windows Firewall Control VS Fping (open source)

Compare Windows Firewall Control VS Fping (open source) and see what are their differences

Windows Firewall Control logo Windows Firewall Control

Windows Firewall Control is not the built in firewall system in the Windows operating systems.

Fping (open source) logo Fping (open source)

fping is a program to send ICMP echo probes to network hosts, similar to ping, but much better performing when pinging multiple hosts.
  • Windows Firewall Control Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-06
  • Fping (open source) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-14

Windows Firewall Control features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Windows Firewall Control offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it simple for users to configure and manage their firewall settings without needing advanced technical knowledge.
  • Customization Options
    The software allows for extensive customization, enabling users to create granular rules for both inbound and outbound traffic, ensuring high levels of security tailored to individual needs.
  • Notifications
    WFC provides real-time notifications when a new program tries to connect to the internet, allowing users to approve or block the application on the spot.
  • Profile Management
    It includes profile management features, enabling quick switching between different security profiles, such as work, home, or public network settings.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with the native Windows Firewall, offering an additional layer of control without conflicting with built-in Windows security features.
  • Low Resource Usage
    The application runs efficiently without consuming a significant amount of system resources, ensuring that it does not negatively impact system performance.

Possible disadvantages of Windows Firewall Control

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, users with no background knowledge in network security might still find it somewhat challenging to understand all available features and settings.
  • Advanced Features Not Free
    While the basic version of WFC is free, access to more advanced features requires a paid license, which may not be ideal for all users, especially those looking for a completely free solution.
  • Limited Support
    Support options are somewhat limited compared to other commercial firewall products, potentially causing delays in resolving user issues.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There are occasional compatibility issues with certain third-party security software, which could cause conflicts or reduced functionality.
  • Complexity for Novice Users
    While powerful, the numerous options and settings can overwhelm novice users, resulting in misconfigurations that could compromise security.

Fping (open source) features and specs

  • Speed
    Fping is designed to send out multiple ICMP Echo Requests in parallel, allowing it to quickly scan large numbers of hosts compared to traditional ping commands.
  • Scripting Friendly
    Fping is suitable for use in shell scripts due to its output format, making it useful for automated network monitoring and management tasks.
  • IPv4 and IPv6 Support
    Fping supports both IPv4 and IPv6, providing flexibility for various network environments.
  • Customizable Options
    It offers a wide range of options for setting the number of pings, intervals, and timing, allowing users to tailor the tool to suit specific needs.
  • Resource Efficiency
    Fping consumes fewer system resources compared to some GUI-based network tools, making it ideal for running on servers and low-power devices.

Possible disadvantages of Fping (open source)

  • Command-Line Interface Only
    Fping does not have a graphical user interface, which may make it less accessible to users who are not familiar with command-line operations.
  • Advanced Configuration Complexity
    While it is highly configurable, the range of options and parameters can be overwhelming for new users who may not have a deep understanding of networking.
  • Limited To Echo Requests
    Fping is designed specifically for ICMP Echo Requests, limiting its usefulness for scenarios that require more in-depth network diagnostics.
  • Lack of Built-In Analysis
    Unlike some more comprehensive network monitoring tools, Fping does not include features for detailed analysis and visualization of network data.
  • Potential Security Restrictions
    Some networks may have security policies that restrict the use of ICMP packets, which could limit Fping's effectiveness or even prevent it from functioning.

Windows Firewall Control videos

Windows Firewall Control (WFC) - BiniSoft.org

More videos:

  • Review - Windows Firewall Control review-Promo2day

Fping (open source) videos

No Fping (open source) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Windows Firewall Control and Fping (open source))
Firewall
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
58 58%
42% 42
OS & Utilities
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Windows Firewall Control and Fping (open source). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Windows Firewall Control and Fping (open source), you can also consider the following products

Windows 10 Firewall Control - Windows 10 Firewall Control: simple and exhaustive solution for applications network activity controlling and monitoring.

Ping Meter Gadget - Customizable, graphical, semi-transparent ping (latency) meter.

TinyWall - Lightweight and non-intrusive firewall

PingInfoView - PingInfoView is a small utility that allows you to easily ping multiple host names and IP addresses, and watch the result in one table.

GlassWire - Visualize network activity in detail, get notified when new apps access the network, look out for...

Open Nettest - Open Nettest is a platform for collecting, processing and visualizing data related QoS and QoE.