WikiArt VS Google Patents

It's the same as the image available on wikiart.org. Source: 11 months ago

In my experience it can be very difficult to get even decent scans of many paintings. I've had a bit of luck with wikiart.org on occasion. The ARC also has some serviceable images. Apparently you can pay for access to higher quality scans, which I haven't tried myself but it's an option. Source: about 1 year ago

The other individual is tight that the lightning lends to the confusion; however, lightning creates depth and depth is only one way to present clarity. I would recommend heading over to a website like WikiArt then head to styles and browse art from 'Cubism' and 'Surrealism'. Line weight, line direction, implied lines, color contrast, and so forth are all ways that you can create clarity. I like that there's... Source: about 1 year ago

If you want art/artists that pushes the Magic boundaries a bit I'd recommend wikiart.org. You can look for art based on art movements and genre and find some cool people. If you find artists you really like there who are still alive, find their website and then you have a goldmine. Source: over 1 year ago

I like to use Muzei on my android device and get every day a new painting. Is there something like it for windows? I have tried an app called John’s Background Switcher for Windows, but I did find any rss to configure with that. I've seen that Muzei for android use wikiart.org publications. Is there some app to get the daily wikiart publications? Source: over 1 year ago

> they deliberately didn't patent it If you'll check the historical record you'll find, for example, patents US2524035A (Bardeen&Brattain, Three-electrode circuit element utilizing semiconductive materials, oldest priority 1948-02-26) and US2569347A (Shockley, Circuit element utilizing semiconductive material, oldest priority 1948-06-26). > How 'bout the amplifiers on the optical fibers? patents.google.com... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

I don't have that hope with past "due diligence" track records. Performing a quick peek for the author at Google Patents I only see mentions of his involvement with neural networks in past work [1]. I am not an expert in patents but I assume that they will apply there and/or publish papers before the company is launched. Except if the breakthrough is not there or it is really revolutionary but statistics are not... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Yeah. Last I'd heard (2018?) they were trying to get into the 3d printing business, but since their main site doesn't say anything to that note I have to believe it's not going too well. https://patents.google.com/?assignee=Xerox+Corporation&sort=new. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Its actually a hard problem: the massive boom that's required to provide reach is inherently quite unstable, not in the mm or cm but we're talking decimeters here. Some of the core tech of FBR dating back ~15 yrs addresses this kind of dynamic stabilization. FBR is impressive and they've built decent an IP. [1] https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Mark+Joseph+Pivac. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

The process of analysing some of the patents is quite tedious I have to admit. Google Patents (https://patents.google.com/) is great and all, but it's not fun to browse patents. So far I haven't found a better way of doing this. If you are interested in just the gist of some of these patents you are welcome to read my notes daily on them here: https://100yearpatents.com. Source: 7 months ago