wezterm VS BusyBox

Compare wezterm VS BusyBox and see what are their differences

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

wezterm

GPU-accelerated cross-platform terminal emulator and multiplexer made with Rust.

BusyBox

BusyBox is a single binary that provides several stripped-down Unix tools in a single executable.

Landing page //
2023-10-02

Landing page //
2019-04-14

wezterm

Website: wezfurlong.org
$ Details

Edit details

BusyBox

Website: busybox.net
$ Details

Edit details

wezterm features and specs

Performance
WezTerm is known for its high performance and low resource usage, making it suitable for heavy terminal workloads.
Cross-Platform
WezTerm supports multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing for a consistent terminal experience across different environments.
Modern Features
It offers modern features like GPU acceleration, ligature support, and configurable color schemes, providing a better user experience.
Extensibility
WezTerm is highly configurable and extensible through its Lua scripting interface, letting users tailor the terminal to their workflow.
Multiplexing
It has built-in support for terminal multiplexing, which allows users to split windows and manage multiple terminal sessions more efficiently.
Active Development
The project is actively maintained and regularly updated with new features and bug fixes.

Possible disadvantages of wezterm

Steep Learning Curve
The extensive configurability and scripting capabilities can be overwhelming for new users who are not familiar with Lua or advanced terminal configurations.
Sparse Documentation
The documentation, while improving, is still not as comprehensive as some other terminals, which can make initial setup and customization challenging.
Young Project
Being relatively newer compared to some other terminal emulators, it may lack some features that long-established users might expect.
Limited Community Support
Due to its younger status and niche user base, there might be less community support and fewer third-party resources compared to more mature terminal emulators.

BusyBox features and specs

Lightweight
BusyBox is designed to be a minimalistic utility that combines tiny versions of many common UNIX utilities into a single small executable, making it ideal for systems with limited resources.
All-in-One
It provides a comprehensive suite of tools and utilities in one package, eliminating the need to install and manage multiple separate utilities.
Customizable
BusyBox can be customized to include only the needed utilities, which allows for a tailored solution that fits the specific requirements of a project or system.
Open Source
It is open source, meaning it is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute, which encourages collaboration and community-driven improvements.
Widely Used in Embedded Systems
BusyBox is popular in embedded systems and other environments where storage and processing power are limited, making it a proven choice for resource-constrained applications.

Possible disadvantages of BusyBox

Limited Functionality
Being a smaller version of each utility, BusyBox may lack some of the advanced features found in full versions of UNIX utilities, which can be a limitation for complex tasks.
Compatibility Issues
Certain scripts or applications that expect specific behaviors from standard Linux utilities might not work correctly with BusyBox due to subtle differences in functionality.
Less Frequent Updates
Compared to mainstream distributions and their utilities, BusyBox might not be updated as frequently, which can be a concern for security or feature updates.
Steeper Learning Curve for Customization
Customizing BusyBox to include or exclude specific utilities can require a more in-depth understanding of both the system’s needs and the configuration options available.

wezterm videos

No wezterm videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

BusyBox videos

+ Add

What is BusyBox | Busybox demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to wezterm and BusyBox)

BusyBox

SSH

87 87%

SSH

13% 13

Terminal Tools

80 80%

Terminal Tools

20% 20

Server Management

83 83%

Server Management

17% 17

Productivity

100 100%

Productivity

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using wezterm and BusyBox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare wezterm and BusyBox

wezterm Reviews

We have no reviews of wezterm yet.
Be the first one to post

BusyBox Reviews

Top 10 Best Apps To Use Linux Terminal on Your Android Device

BusyBox is an excellent option for Android users who want to have control in the internal Linux command-line shell. This terminal emulator for Android requires a rooted device to function properly. It is one of the most popular among its competitors. There is a pro version, but the vanilla edition is more than enough for casual users. It will provide you with numerous Unix...

Source: www.ubuntupit.com

Best Terminal Emulator for Android in 2021

BusyBox is a famous terminal emulator for quick and reliable performance. It needs the device to be rooted for executing the app. The emulator can work well with Linux kernel with GNU Core applications. It offers plenty of standard Unix tools with backup features to retrieve all data. The app provides the user to choose the desired applets for quick installation. It also...

Source: www.techowns.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, wezterm should be more popular than BusyBox. It has been mentiond 47 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

wezterm mentions (47)

Make Wezterm Mimic Tmux
A month ago, I came across WezTerm, a new GPU-accelerated, cross-platform terminal emulator written in Rust (and I’m not a Rust fanboy, for real!). It piqued my interest, so I decided to give it a try. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
In your opinion, what is the text-editor equivalent of Openbox?
2) Examples of text editors that make use of features of the gui window manager the text editor is run under: gvim, gedit, leafpad[5], overleaf[6] 3) text editor with 'run-time' presentation extension of protocols such as html : vim live server[7] 4) write one's own custom interface to use with bashed[8] ---- [0] : intro to terminal multiplexers (part 1) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0upAE692fY [1] :... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Executable Blog Posts: Second Take
I used Lua for years to configure my awesomewm desktop environment. Then, I started using it to configure my Wezterm. Since I bumped into an Emacs bug (lsp-mode bug to be fair), I switched quickly to Neovim after 20 years of Emacs, and I am using Lua to configure my Neovim. Last but not least, OpenResty gives my Nginx superpowers with Lua. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
WezTerm: an actually good config key binding recipe
While WezTerm is a great terminal with sane defaults, it doesn't provide The default key binding to open the configuration file and edit it. That is Understandable, everyone may have their own preference for that. Here we will Figure out the recipe that would work everywhere and abide by modern standards. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Superfile – A fancy, petty terminal file manager
I very well might be in the minority of Linux users, but I don't particularly care about the answers to most of these questions. I just want it to work. Give me solid defaults[0]. I'm not saying you shouldn't be able to override those defaults. That's an important feature of Linux. My first experience running a cool-looking TUI file manager yesterday (I actually ended up trying yazi first) was that I got a lot of... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

BusyBox mentions (17)

Revisit base container image for AWS services
The busybox container is, as the name suggests, a base image that contains the minimum environment for BusyBox to work. It is also one of the official Docker images. The actual Dockerfile for creating this image is as follows:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Making memcpy(NULL, NULL, 0) well-defined
Https://busybox.net/~landley/c99-draft.html#7.20.6.1 "The abs, labs, and llabs functions compute the absolute value of an integer j. If the result cannot be represented, the behavior is undefined. (242)" 242 The absolute value of the most negative number cannot be represented in two's complement. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Docker, Linux, Security. Kinda.
On to our second point, which is the cli utilities' implementation. Debian and Ubuntu use gnu's Coreutils while Alpine uses Busybox(remember, we are talking about the most used application container bases. You can install a desktop version of Alpine with GNU coreutils). Here we have the same situation as before, The GNU coreutils are bigger, do more and have a larger attack surface. Busybox is smaller, does not... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
The Awk Programming Language, Second Edition
AWK runs everywhere. Perl and Python do not. Busybox has their own independent AWK implementation. https://busybox.net/ https://frippery.org/busybox/ Also see the first edition of the AWK manual online here: https://archive.org/details/pdfy-MgN0H1joIoDVoIC7. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
This would have made my life so much easier in the beginning....
A majority of routers are already based on the Linux kernel. Many are just BusyBox. The most common Linux firewalls are iptables and nftables. With the latter being the most popular one due to being around longer. They are really fine grained and powerful. Source: about 2 years ago