WebTranslateIt VS Babel

WebTranslateIt Reviews

1. Lizzie

   | Project Manager at Liveminds | over 2 years ago
   Great tool!

   We've used WebTranslateIt for years to translate our platforms, IOS & Andriod mobile apps into 30+ Languages. We've always used freelance translators and the process has always been so simple to get them set up and translating straight away which is so helpful, particularly on a tight deadline. The discussions feature has been invaluable to support translators in context to the appropriate string.

2. J Bonniot

   | Project Manager at Molotov | over 2 years ago
   Great Translation Project Management Service

   We use WebTranslateIt for the coordination of large translation projects for apps and websites : it's easy to use, easy to import translation files, easy to export, and easy to dialogue with different collaborators.

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Third party service integration|Auto translation|Project management

   👎 Cons:    Ui is not very attractive
3. Ines Karu

   | Product Owner of Fitekin at Unifiedpost AS | over 2 years ago
   Easy and simple

   It was very easy to implement the Webtranslatelt and import existing translation keys to Webtranslatelt using the APIs. Also, the translators' onboarding was quick and didn´t need much support.

   👍 Pros:    Quick and easy|Easy to setup|Intuitive|Unlimited users|User rights restrictions based on languages|Great customer support|Translation key comments are visible (no need extra clicks)

   👎 Cons:    Ui is not very attractive|Attached screenshots need to open in separate tab

Babel Reviews

WebTranslateIt mentions (2)

• Localization in .NET console and desktop apps

  At a previous job we utilized https://webtranslateit.com/ - it organized everything easily for volunteers to provide translations for all resx strings. - Source: Hacker News / 1 day ago

• free-for.dev

  Webtranslateit.com — Free up to 500 strings. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Babel mentions (134)

• How, and why, you should add JavaScript linting to your project. With ESLint and Gulp

  Some of the most popular JavaScript linting tools are ESLint, JSHint, JSLint and JSCS. We're going to be using ESLint. It’s very flexible, easy to use and has the best ES6 support, which will be helpful if we introduce more modern JavaScript (that will be transpiled for older browsers using https://babeljs.io/). All rules for ESLint can be found here: https://eslint.org/docs/rules/. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• What is Server Side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG)?

  This simply extends the existing build process that many front-end frameworks have. After Babel's done with its transpilation, it merely executes code to compile your initial screen into static HTML and CSS. This isn't entirely dissimilar from how SSR hydrates your initial screen, but it's done at compile-time, not at request time. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Storybook 8 Beta

  First, we switched the default compiler for new projects from Babel to SWC (Speedy Web Compiler). SWC is dramatically faster than Babel and requires zero configuration. We’ll continue to support Babel in any project currently using it. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Nuxt vs Next: Which JavaScript Framework Suits Your Next Project?

  Nuxt.js is an open-source JavaScript framework built on Vue.js, Node.js, Vite, and Babel.js used for creating fast, cutting-edge applications. Nuxt.js possesses similar features to Next.js, with the major difference being the web framework it is compatible with. Next.js is a React framework whereas Nuxt.js is a Vue framework. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• Abstract Syntax Trees and Practical Applications in JavaScript

  Disclaimer: If you've already developed Babel or ESLint plugins, this article may not be as beneficial for you, as you're likely already familiar with the majority of the content covered here. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago