Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WebSite-Watcher VS localhost.run

Compare WebSite-Watcher VS localhost.run and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

WebSite-Watcher logo WebSite-Watcher

WebSite-Watcher detects website updates and highlights all changes in the text. WebSite-Watcher monitors web pages, password protected pages, disucssion forums and much more.

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!
  • WebSite-Watcher Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-12
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

WebSite-Watcher features and specs

  • Comprehensive Monitoring
    WebSite-Watcher allows you to monitor websites for changes comprehensively, including content updates, new posts, and changes in specific sections.
  • Customization
    The tool offers a high degree of customization, allowing users to set specific criteria for monitoring, such as keywords, frequency of checks, and types of changes to track.
  • Multi-Platform Support
    WebSite-Watcher supports a variety of platforms, including Windows, and also offers mobile alerts, making it highly versatile.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The software features a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for both novices and advanced users to configure and manage their website monitoring tasks.
  • Automation
    The tool supports automation through scripts and macros, enabling advanced users to automate complex monitoring tasks and integrate WebSite-Watcher into their workflows.

Possible disadvantages of WebSite-Watcher

  • Cost
    WebSite-Watcher is a paid software, and while it offers a free trial, the full version may be considered expensive for individual users or small businesses.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and customization options, there might be a steep learning curve, particularly for users who are new to website monitoring tools.
  • Windows-Centric
    The software is primarily designed for Windows, which may limit accessibility for users on other operating systems like macOS or Linux.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running WebSite-Watcher continuously can be resource-intensive, which might affect the performance of lower-end computers.
  • Limited Mobile Functionality
    While mobile alerts are supported, the overall functionality and user experience on mobile devices are limited compared to the desktop version.

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WebSite-Watcher and localhost.run)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Localhost Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Uptime Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using WebSite-Watcher and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare WebSite-Watcher and localhost.run

WebSite-Watcher Reviews

We have no reviews of WebSite-Watcher yet.
Be the first one to post

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 42 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WebSite-Watcher mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WebSite-Watcher yet. Tracking of WebSite-Watcher recommendations started around Mar 2021.

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WebSite-Watcher and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products

Visualping - Visualping is the easiest to use website checker, webpage change monitoring, website change detector and website change alert software of the web. Read more about Visualping.

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Distill Web Monitor - Distill is a web monitoring tool. It can monitor RSS feeds, a webpage or a part of webpage. Alerts in the form of pop-up, audio or emails can be received.

Portmap.io - Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

Wachete - Track web page changes and get notified. Free Sign-up. Have all data in one place

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.