Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Webroot VS Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Compare Webroot VS Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and see what are their differences

Webroot logo Webroot

Webroot delivers multi-vector protection for endpoints and networks and threat intelligence services to protect businesses and individuals in a connected world.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication logo Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication helps safeguard access to data and applications while meeting user demand for a simple sign-in process.
  • Webroot Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-29
  • Azure Multi-Factor Authentication Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

Webroot features and specs

  • Cloud-based Protection
    Webroot uses cloud-based technology to provide real-time protection against threats. It’s lightweight and doesn’t require significant system resources, which means it runs smoothly even on older systems.
  • Fast Scanning
    Webroot is known for its rapid scanning capabilities. It can scan a computer in a much shorter time compared to traditional antivirus programs.
  • Low Impact on System Performance
    Due to its cloud-based architecture, Webroot has a minimal impact on system performance, allowing users to carry on with their tasks without noticeable slowdowns.
  • Comprehensive Suite
    Webroot offers a complete suite of security features, including antivirus, firewall, phishing protection, and identity theft protection, providing all-around security.
  • Multi-Device Support
    Webroot offers plans that cover multiple devices, which is ideal for users who need to safeguard their smartphones, tablets, and PCs under a single license.

Possible disadvantages of Webroot

  • Lack of Advanced Features
    While Webroot provides basic protection, it may lack some advanced features like a file shredder or parental controls that other security suites offer.
  • Cloud Dependency
    Being heavily cloud-dependent, Webroot may not be as effective if the user is offline for extended periods, potentially limiting its protective capabilities.
  • Price
    Compared to some other antivirus solutions, Webroot can be on the pricier side, especially for users looking for comprehensive coverage across multiple devices.
  • Support
    While Webroot offers customer support, some users have reported long wait times and varying levels of satisfaction with the help they received.
  • Mixed Independent Test Results
    Webroot sometimes receives mixed results from independent antivirus testing labs, which could make potential users skeptical about its efficacy compared to more consistently top-ranked products.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Azure MFA adds an additional layer of security by requiring users to verify their identity through multiple methods, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
  • Flexible Authentication Options
    It supports various authentication methods such as phone calls, text messages, app notifications, and hardware tokens, providing flexibility for users.
  • Integration with Microsoft Services
    Seamless integration with other Microsoft services and Azure Active Directory ensures a cohesive security solution across different Microsoft platforms.
  • Compliance Support
    Helps organizations meet compliance requirements by providing an additional layer of security that is often mandated by regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, etc.
  • User-friendly
    Designed to be straightforward for end-users, reducing the friction typically associated with multi-factor authentication processes.
  • Conditional Access Policies
    Enables the configuration of conditional access policies to enforce MFA for specific scenarios, balancing security needs and user convenience.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

  • Cost
    While some features are available for free, comprehensive usage of Azure MFA can incur additional costs depending on the Azure AD licensing model.
  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for organizations without a dedicated IT team.
  • Reliance on Internet Connectivity
    Most verification methods require an internet connection, which can be a drawback in environments with unstable or unreliable internet access.
  • Potential User Resistance
    Some users may find the authentication process cumbersome or may resist changes to the login process, requiring additional user education and support.
  • Dependency on External Devices
    Authentication methods like text messages or app notifications depend on users having access to their mobile devices, which can be problematic if a device is lost or stolen.
  • Integration Challenges with Non-Microsoft Services
    While Azure MFA integrates well with Microsoft services, integration with third-party or non-Microsoft applications may require additional configuration and support.

Analysis of Webroot

Overall verdict

  • Webroot is generally considered a solid choice for users seeking lightweight, robust antivirus and internet security software. Its cloud-based approach offers unique advantages in terms of resource efficiency and real-time updates. However, it may not offer as many additional features as some competitors in the same price range. For users primarily looking for strong protection with minimal impact on system performance, Webroot is a good option.

Why this product is good

  • Webroot is known for its cloud-based antivirus and internet security solutions that provide real-time protection against a range of threats including viruses, malware, and phishing attacks. Its software is lightweight, meaning it doesn't use much system resources, which can be beneficial for users with older or less powerful devices. Webroot also offers additional features like identity theft protection, secure browsing, and a firewall. Reviews often highlight its fast scanning speeds, ease of use, and effective threat detection capabilities.

Recommended for

    Webroot is especially recommended for users who prioritize a lightweight security solution that doesn't slow down their devices, as well as those who value real-time threat detection and easy-to-use interfaces. It's also well-suited for users who prefer cloud-based security solutions and those who need basic protection without extensive additional features.

Analysis of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Overall verdict

  • Azure Multi-Factor Authentication is a reliable and effective solution for enhancing security within Microsoft environments and beyond. It is widely recognized for its comprehensive features and seamless integration capabilities, making it a strong choice for organizations looking to implement MFA.

Why this product is good

  • Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) is considered good due to its robust security features, ease of integration with existing Microsoft services, and its ability to support a wide range of verification methods such as phone calls, text messages, and authenticator apps. It enhances security by requiring two or more pieces of evidence to verify a user's identity, reducing the risk of unauthorized access. Additionally, it offers flexibility and scalability, making it suitable for various organizational needs.

Recommended for

    Azure Multi-Factor Authentication is recommended for organizations using Microsoft's cloud services, such as Azure and Office 365, as well as for businesses that prioritize security and need to protect sensitive information and access against unauthorized use. It is particularly suited for enterprises that require a scalable and versatile MFA solution.

Webroot videos

Webroot vs Malware | Test

More videos:

  • Review - Webroot Antivirus Test & Review 2019 - Antivirus Security Review
  • Review - Webroot SecureAnywhere Review

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication videos

How to register for Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Webroot and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Identity And Access Management
Identity Provider
60 60%
40% 40
Two Factor Authentication

User comments

Share your experience with using Webroot and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Webroot and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Webroot Reviews

Best firewall software of 2024
There's a lot to love about Webroot AntiVirus, and the 70-day 100% money-back guarantee suggests the company is confident in the product as well. If you're sick of overly complex and bloated engines, Webroot is a worthy contender for you.
13 best antivirus software platforms, per a cybersecurity expert
Providing baseline antivirus protection, Webroot SecureAnywhere Antivirus secures your data on one Windows or Mac device at $30 for the first year and $40 each year after. “Its claim is that it runs 60x faster than the scan time of other tested competitor antivirus products and takes 20 seconds to check your computer for malware by being fully cloud-based,” Bader said.
Source: nypost.com
Best antivirus software of 2022
A significant con is the major testing labs have not tested Webroot SecureAnywhere AntiVirus for several years now. However, for those with an older system, and want antivirus software that runs lighter, should consider Webroot SecureAnywhere AntiVirus. The annual subscription is an affordable $19.99 which protects a single device.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication Reviews

We have no reviews of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Multi-Factor Authentication seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Webroot mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Webroot yet. Tracking of Webroot recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication mentions (2)

  • MFA for Outlook Online on cell phone
    This is the answer, more detail: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/concept-mfa-howitworks. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What do you do if you lost your phone with Microsoft Authenticator?
    Make sure that you back-up the active app-configuration, this way you have an easier way to recover; make sure you are allowed to verify using more than an authenticator, more here. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Webroot and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication, you can also consider the following products

VIPRE - Keep your data safe with VIPRE. We offer industry leading, top-rated antivirus software and cyber security protection for personal and business use.

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

DbProtect - Trustwave DbProtect is a highly scalable database security platform that helps organizations secure their relational databases and big data stores, both on premises and in the cloud.

Authy - Best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, simplest 2fa Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

Shibboleth - standards based, open source software for web single sign-on across or within organizational...

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duo’s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.