Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

WebPagetest VS Request Metrics

Compare WebPagetest VS Request Metrics and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

WebPagetest logo WebPagetest

Run a free website speed test from multiple locations around the globe using real browsers...

Request Metrics logo Request Metrics

The easy way to track your Core Web Vitals and boost website performance.
  • WebPagetest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-05
  • Request Metrics
    Image date //
    2025-02-03
  • Request Metrics
    Image date //
    2025-02-03
  • Request Metrics
    Image date //
    2025-02-03
  • Request Metrics
    Image date //
    2025-02-03
  • Request Metrics
    Image date //
    2025-02-03

Unified Web Performance that automatically tests your pages and tracks real user experiences. Automatically discovers your busiest pages and scans them weekly, providing actionable recommendations. Integrated Real User Monitoring to track the actual experience of visitors to your website.

WebPagetest

Website
webpagetest.org
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

Request Metrics

Website
requestmetrics.com
Pricing URL
Official Request Metrics Pricing
$ Details
freemium $49.0 / Monthly (per Website)
Platforms
Browser
Release Date
2020 May
Startup details
Country
United States
State
MN
City
Minneapolis
Founder(s)
Todd Gardner, Eric Brandes, Jordan Griffin
Employees
1 - 9
Edit details

WebPagetest features and specs

  • Detailed Performance Metrics
    WebPagetest provides extensive performance metrics, including Time to First Byte (TTFB), Speed Index, and First Contentful Paint, allowing for a deep understanding of website performance.
  • Real Browsers
    Tests are conducted using real browsers, which ensures that the results are closely aligned with real user experiences.
  • Geolocation Testing
    Supports testing from various locations worldwide, which is useful for understanding performance in different markets.
  • Advanced Testing Options
    Offers advanced options such as scripting for complex interactions, multi-step transactions, and authenticating users.
  • Free and Open Source
    WebPagetest is free to use and its code is open-source, allowing for community contributions and customizable implementations.
  • Video Capture
    Provides video capture of the loading process, giving a visual representation of loading performance.
  • Waterfall Charts
    Generates detailed waterfall charts that help identify bottlenecks in resource loading.

Possible disadvantages of WebPagetest

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive options and detailed metrics may be overwhelming for beginners who are not familiar with web performance testing.
  • Intermittent Performance
    As a free service, sometimes the performance can be inconsistent due to high demand or limited resources.
  • Dated Interface
    The user interface of the website is somewhat dated and could benefit from modernization to improve user experience.
  • Limited Instant Support
    Lack of immediate support options can be a downside; users often have to rely on forums and community support.
  • Potential for Inconsistent Results
    Results might vary between tests due to variability in internet speed, server conditions, and other external factors.
  • Configuration Overhead
    Advanced testing options require a significant amount of configuration, which can be time-consuming.

Request Metrics features and specs

  • Real User Monitoring
  • Automatic Performance Testing
  • Core Web Vitals
  • Alerting
  • Recommendations

Analysis of WebPagetest

Overall verdict

  • Yes, WebPagetest is considered a good tool for evaluating website performance. It is widely used by developers and performance engineers for its accuracy and the depth of information it provides.

Why this product is good

  • WebPagetest is highly regarded for its detailed performance analysis capabilities, offering in-depth insights into page speed and other performance metrics. It allows users to run tests from multiple locations, on various devices and browsers, which is crucial for assessing a website's performance under different conditions. The tool provides a comprehensive waterfall chart and numerous other diagnostic features that help identify performance bottlenecks and potential optimization areas.

Recommended for

    WebPagetest is recommended for web developers, performance engineers, SEO specialists, and anyone interested in optimizing website speed and performance. It is especially useful for those who need detailed insights into page load processes and performance optimization opportunities.

WebPagetest videos

+ Add

WebPageTest - The State of the Web

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Use WebPageTest.org - For Beginners

Request Metrics videos

+ Add

What is Request Metrics?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WebPagetest and Request Metrics)

WebPagetest

Request Metrics

Website Monitoring
65 65%
Website Monitoring
35% 35
Monitoring Tools
50 50%
Monitoring Tools
50% 50
Performance Monitoring
64 64%
Performance Monitoring
36% 36
Uptime Monitoring
100 100%
Uptime Monitoring
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using WebPagetest and Request Metrics. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare WebPagetest and Request Metrics

WebPagetest Reviews

We have no reviews of WebPagetest yet.
Be the first one to post

Request Metrics Reviews

  1. imeldapaints
    · Lead Developer at pounce3 ·
    Easy Performance Monitoring

    I was looking for alternatives to Speedcurve for our new project. It looked nice, but it was slow and really expensive.

    I discovered Request Metrics online, which looks very similar but a lot cheaper. The interface was a lot faster too, which seemed like a good sign for a performance company. It has been really great to work with so far and the support responds to my questions right away.

    🏁 Competitors: SpeedCurve
    👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Easy to install|Super simple
    👎 Cons:    No custom queries

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WebPagetest seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 51 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WebPagetest mentions (51)

  • A PageSpeed insight report, but for every page in your domain
    Trust neither. The most optimal option I've found is webpagetest.org Its been quite handy lately. This tool does look interesting. Source: about 2 years ago
  • How are you all accurately checking your website load time? Not sure PageSpeedInsights is very helpful.
    Webpagetest.org is another. Pagespeedinsights and lighthouse are great for identifying page load issues to fix, but actual page load times will always vary between the user and your web server. Universal analytics has some page load timings but that's going away soon and nothing afaik is in GA4. I've seen an example of building a page load timer in tag manager and dumping the results into an event. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Extreme confusing over Speed Index results -- webpagetest.org
    So I am working on rebuilding our company's site with a new stack. I am running tests using webpagetest.org, and I am having trouble fully understanding the speed index results as well as the film strip view. The page renders quite fast everywhere I test it. Google Lighthouse shows it in the 90s + for performance score, however when I test the page on webpagetest, I get load times of 77 seconds (NOT MS) which is... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Does anyone else experience pure ecstasy when they get 100 on Lighthouse? 😩
    Webpagetest.org is great, and checking OP's site they have done an incredible job, I don't think I have ever made or seen an Ecom site this slick. Super clean waterfall view. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Performance scores for Google Lighthouse/Insights seem to be very inaccurate
    Thanks for the recommendation regarding webpagetest.org, another user made a similar recommendation so I will check it out. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Request Metrics mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Request Metrics yet. Tracking of Request Metrics recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WebPagetest and Request Metrics, you can also consider the following products

GTmetrix - GTmetrix is a free tool that analyzes your page's speed performance. Using PageSpeed and YSlow, GTmetrix generates scores for your pages and offers actionable recommendations on how to fix them.

Pingdom - With website monitoring from Pingdom you will be the first to know when your website is down. No installation required. 30-day free trial.

PageSpeed Insights - PageSpeed is addon for ...

Google Lighthouse - Lighthouse is an open-source, automated tool for improving the quality of web pages.

Thats Why App - That's Why is the best Real User Monitoring tool out there. We collect, analyze and display real user metrics and give you targeted advice that helps improve the user experience of your website or PWA. Interested? Try our free 14-day trial.

DareBoost - DareBoost is an online tool to test, analyze and monitor your website: speed, SEO, quality, security. All you need for website optimization in a single service.

Loading...