Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

WebLOAD VS Phabricator

Compare WebLOAD VS Phabricator and see what are their differences

monday.com
The most intuitive platform to manage projects and teamwork featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

WebLOAD logo WebLOAD

WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details

Phabricator logo Phabricator

Phacility - Phabricator
  • WebLOAD Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-20
  • Phabricator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13

WebLOAD features and specs

  • Scalability
    WebLOAD can handle large-scale performance testing, from a few virtual users to millions, making it suitable for large enterprise applications.
  • Comprehensive Protocol Support
    Supports a wide range of protocols such as HTTP/HTTPS, SOAP, REST, and WebSocket, allowing it to test diverse web applications.
  • Real-Time Analytics
    Provides real-time monitoring and analytics, giving immediate insights into performance bottlenecks and system behavior during tests.
  • JavaScript Scripting
    Uses JavaScript for scripting, providing flexibility and familiarity for web developers to create complex test scenarios.
  • Cloud Integration
    Offers seamless integration with cloud platforms like AWS and Azure, enabling distributed testing without infrastructure constraints.
  • Ease of Use
    Has a user-friendly interface and comprehensive documentation, making it relatively easy for new users to get started.

Possible disadvantages of WebLOAD

  • Cost
    WebLOAD is a commercial tool with a potentially high cost, which might be prohibitive for small businesses or individual developers.
  • Steeper Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic features are user-friendly, mastering more advanced features and customizations can require significant time and effort.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running large-scale performance tests can be resource-heavy, requiring significant computational power and memory.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    While it offers some integrations, the range is more limited compared to other performance testing tools, potentially limiting its utility in diverse development environments.
  • Customer Support
    Some users have reported that customer support can be slow or less responsive, which can be a bottleneck during critical testing phases.

Phabricator features and specs

  • Comprehensive Toolset
    Phabricator offers a wide range of tools including code review, repository hosting, bug tracking, project management, and more, all integrated into one platform.
  • Customizability
    Users can customize workflows, forms, and other aspects to fit the specific needs of their projects.
  • Powerful Code Review
    Phabricator provides advanced code review features like inline comments, custom fields, and audit trails, making it a robust tool for maintaining code quality.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Phabricator allows organizations to host their instance, providing control over data and customizations without licensing fees.
  • Multi-repository Support
    It supports multiple version control systems (Git, Mercurial, and Subversion) and allows managing multiple repositories within the same project.

Possible disadvantages of Phabricator

  • Complex Setup
    Phabricator can be challenging to install and configure, requiring a good level of technical knowledge and infrastructure.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users might find it difficult to navigate and use all the features due to its extensive functionalities and less intuitive user interface.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    Compared to other platforms, Phabricator has fewer integrations with third-party tools, which might be a limitation for some teams.
  • Dependency on Phacility's Future
    Phacility announced that they will cease operations, which means the future maintenance and updates of Phabricator could be uncertain.
  • Performance Issues
    For large-scale projects with many users and repositories, Phabricator may experience performance issues and could require significant resources to run smoothly.

WebLOAD videos

+ Add

WebLOAD load testing tool overview

More videos:

  • Review - WebLOAD IDE - Recording a Script
  • Review - Load testing WebServices with WebLOAD

Phabricator videos

+ Add

Phabricator code review session at Wikimedia Hackathon Zurich

More videos:

  • Review - Phabricator and Lando Brownbag July 2 2018
  • Review - Nizameddin Ordulu - Phabricator: An all-in-one tool for code review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WebLOAD and Phabricator)

WebLOAD

Phabricator

Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100
Website Testing
100 100%
Website Testing
0% 0
Git
0 0%
Git
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using WebLOAD and Phabricator. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Phabricator seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WebLOAD mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WebLOAD yet. Tracking of WebLOAD recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Phabricator mentions (3)

  • Migrating from Phabricator to Azure Devops. Have some questions.
    My company has used Phabricator, which is an alternative to Azure Devops, for about 5 years. A few days ago they announced that the project won't be maintained anymore, so we are looking into alternatives. We have around 50 devs+product folks that use Phabricator at the moment. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Is there any "Unified HUB SOlution" in this Microservices era?
    You also mention Gitlab is close to what you would like - maybe Phabricator is even closer: https://phacility.com/phabricator/. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Is there an alternative to open project with the next characteristics ?
    Https://phacility.com/phabricator/ I think checks most of those boxes, maybe all. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WebLOAD and Phabricator, you can also consider the following products

OctoPerf - OctoPerf is a SaaS load testing solution, based on JMeter.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

StresStimulus - Load testing tool for websites and mobile that works with hard-to-test applications.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

SmartMeter.io - Performance Testing with Enterprise-Level Features with a familiar jMeter interface

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

Loading...