Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Weblate VS Underscore.js

Compare Weblate VS Underscore.js and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Weblate logo Weblate

Weblate is a free web-based translation management system.

Underscore.js logo Underscore.js

Underscore is a utility-belt library for JavaScript that provides a lot of the functional...
  • Weblate Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-21
  • Underscore.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-17

Weblate features and specs

  • Open Source
    Weblate is an open-source translation tool, meaning it is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. This fosters a collaborative development environment and a transparent codebase.
  • Integrations
    Weblate supports seamless integration with Git, allowing translations to be continuously merged and integrated within software development workflows. This helps in maintaining a cohesive development and translation cycle.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform offers a clean and intuitive user interface that makes it easy for both developers and translators to use. The interface simplifies the process of managing and submitting translations.
  • Support for Multiple Formats
    Weblate supports a wide range of file formats, including JSON, PO, MO, XLIFF, and more, making it versatile for different types of projects.
  • Collaborative Features
    The tool includes features that promote collaboration among translators, such as commenting, suggestions, and voting on translations to ensure high-quality output.
  • Live Translation Updates
    Changes made via the Weblate interface are committed directly to the version control system, providing live updates and reflecting changes in real-time.

Possible disadvantages of Weblate

  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration of Weblate can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for those not familiar with version control systems like Git.
  • Performance Issues
    In some cases, Weblate may experience performance slowdowns, especially with extremely large projects or repositories. This can affect the efficiency of translation workflows.
  • Limited Cloud Options
    While Weblate offers a cloud-hosted version, the options and features may be limited compared to other commercial translation platforms, which could be a drawback for some organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    Although user-friendly, there is still a learning curve for new users, particularly those who are not used to working with translation management systems or version control.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a self-hosted instance of Weblate can be resource-intensive, requiring sufficient server infrastructure and maintenance to ensure smooth operation.
  • Documentation
    While extensive, the documentation can sometimes be overwhelming or lacking in specific areas, making it challenging for users to find the exact information they need.

Underscore.js features and specs

  • Utility Functions
    Underscore.js provides a wealth of utility functions for common tasks such as map, reduce, filter, and more, making it easier to perform operations on arrays, objects, and collections.
  • Consistency
    The library offers a consistent API, which can make your code more readable and maintainable by providing a standard way to perform common programming tasks.
  • Lightweight
    Underscore.js is lightweight compared to full-featured libraries like Lodash, which can be a benefit if you're looking to minimize your application's footprint.
  • Browser Compatibility
    It supports a wide range of JavaScript environments, making it a good choice for projects that need to work across different browsers and Node.js.
  • Quick to Learn
    Easy to pick up for developers with even a basic understanding of JavaScript, due to its straightforward documentation and familiar function names.

Possible disadvantages of Underscore.js

  • Performance
    Underscore.js may not offer the same level of performance optimizations as more modern utility libraries like Lodash, potentially leading to slower execution for some tasks.
  • Limited Functionality
    While it covers many basic utility functions, its feature set is not as extensive as Lodash or other similar libraries, which provide a broader range of capabilities.
  • Outdated
    With the advent of ECMAScript 5 and later versions, many of the functions provided by Underscore.js are now natively available in JavaScript, reducing its necessity.
  • No Modularization
    Underscore does not support modular builds in the same way Lodash does, meaning you might end up including the entire library even if you only need a few functions.
  • Community and Maintenance
    While still maintained, Underscore.js has seen less active development and contributions compared to newer libraries, which could impact its long-term viability and support.

Analysis of Weblate

Overall verdict

  • Weblate is generally considered a good platform for software localization.

Why this product is good

  • Weblate is appreciated for its user-friendly interface, support for a wide range of file formats, and seamless integration with version control systems like Git. It provides a collaborative environment for translation projects and has features that help manage translation consistency and quality. Additionally, being open-source, it provides flexibility for customization and is cost-effective for those hosting it themselves.

Recommended for

    Weblate is recommended for open-source projects looking for a free, integrative localization tool, teams needing a collaborative translation environment, and organizations seeking a scalable solution for managing multilingual content efficiently.

Analysis of Underscore.js

Overall verdict

  • Underscore.js is a reasonable choice if you need a lightweight library for concise, functional programming helpers. While newer libraries or vanilla JavaScript have made some of its functions less essential, Underscore.js remains useful for its simplicity and comprehensive utility set.

Why this product is good

  • Underscore.js is a popular JavaScript library that provides a comprehensive set of utility functions for common programming tasks. It is valued for its simplicity and ease of integration, especially in projects that require functional programming patterns but do not need the full capabilities of larger libraries like Lodash. Underscore.js is lightweight and can significantly enhance productivity by offering functions for tasks such as object manipulation, array operations, and function binding, making code more readable and maintainable.

Recommended for

    Developers working on smaller projects or legacy codebases that require a reliable utility library with functional programming techniques. It’s also suitable for those who prefer a minimalistic approach and don’t require the extensive features of heavier alternatives.

Weblate videos

+ Add

WEBLATE TUTORIAL

Underscore.js videos

+ Add

Introduction to Underscore.JS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Weblate and Underscore.js)

Weblate

Underscore.js

Localization
100 100%
Localization
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100
Website Localization
100 100%
Website Localization
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
Development Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Weblate and Underscore.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Underscore.js seems to be a lot more popular than Weblate. While we know about 23 links to Underscore.js, we've tracked only 1 mention of Weblate. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Weblate mentions (1)

Underscore.js mentions (23)

  • JavaScript evolution: From Lodash and Underscore to vanilla
    Underscore was created by Jeremy Ashkenas (the creator of Backbone.js) in 2009 to provide a set of utility functions that JavaScript lacked at the time. It was also created to work with Backbone.js, but it slowly became a favorite among developers who needed utility functions that they could just call and get stuff done with without having to worry about the inner implementations and browser compatibility. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • KlongPy: High-Performance Array Programming in Python
    There was a step-change improvement for me when I tried expressing some JS patterns via `underscore.js` instead of procedurally: eg: http://underscorejs.org/#each Thinking of something as `each | map | filter | sum` is waaay less buggy than writing bespoke procedural code to do the same thing. No doubt there is a "cost" to it as well, but the _abstraction_ is valuable. Now, if there were a "compiler" which could... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    Underscore.js: A utility library that offers a full set of functional programming helpers without extending any built-in JavaScript objects. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Mastering Node.js
    Underscore contains just about every core utility method you want. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • 8 NPM Packages for JavaScript Beginners [2024][+tutorials]
    Not too far behind is Underscore.js, another utility library that's all about enhancing your JavaScript mojo. Whether you're dealing with arrays, objects, or strings, Underscore has got something for you. It's like Lodash's sibling, offering similar functionalities but with its own flair. The choice between them is like picking between chocolate and vanilla - it really comes down to personal taste. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Weblate and Underscore.js, you can also consider the following products

POEditor - The translation and localization management platform that's easy to use *and* affordable!

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Crowdin - Localize your product in a seamless way

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Transifex - Transifex makes it easy to collect, translate and deliver digital content, web and mobile apps in multiple languages. Localization for agile teams.

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

Loading...