Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Web Components VS GHCJS

Compare Web Components VS GHCJS and see what are their differences

bunq
bank of the Free! Mobile banking that makes life easy. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Web Components logo Web Components

Native/Vanilla web components.

GHCJS logo GHCJS

Haskell to JavaScript compiler, based on GHC. Contribute to ghcjs/ghcjs development by creating an account on GitHub.
  • Web Components Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-11-04
  • GHCJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-10

Web Components features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

GHCJS features and specs

  • Haskell to JavaScript Compilation
    GHCJS allows developers to compile Haskell code to JavaScript, enabling the use of Haskell’s advanced type system and functional programming features in web development.
  • Code Reusability
    Developers can reuse their Haskell codebase for both server-side and client-side applications, reducing code duplication and maintenance efforts.
  • Strong Type System
    Haskell’s strong static type system helps in catching errors at compile time, which can result in more robust and reliable code for web applications.
  • Interoperability
    GHCJS provides interoperability with existing JavaScript libraries and modules, allowing developers to integrate Haskell into existing JavaScript ecosystems smoothly.

Possible disadvantages of GHCJS

  • Performance Overhead
    Generated JavaScript code may have performance overhead compared to native JavaScript, which can affect the execution speed of web applications.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    The GHCJS ecosystem and tooling may not be as mature or extensive as more established JavaScript frameworks, potentially leading to challenges in debugging and developer support.
  • Compilation Complexity
    The compilation process from Haskell to JavaScript can be complex, and build times might be longer compared to traditional JavaScript projects.
  • Limited Community and Support
    The GHCJS community is relatively smaller compared to mainstream JavaScript communities, which might limit the availability of resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries.

Web Components videos

+ Add

Web Components: The Secret Ingredient Helping Power The Web

More videos:

  • Review - React vs Web Components?
  • Review - A Review of Web Components in 2020 - Bit.dev

GHCJS videos

No GHCJS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Web Components and GHCJS)

Web Components

GHCJS

Personal Finance
39 39%
Personal Finance
61% 61
Financial Planner
45 45%
Financial Planner
55% 55
Finance
51 51%
Finance
49% 49
Android
100 100%
Android
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Web Components and GHCJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GHCJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Web Components mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Web Components yet. Tracking of Web Components recommendations started around Mar 2021.

GHCJS mentions (4)

  • Secretly introduced rust in my company, now they love it!
    There is a fork that compiles to js https://github.com/ghcjs/ghcjs compiler, and I believe the official glasgow compiler is working towards also supporting js/wasm (although I don't think they are supported as of yet). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is GHCJS stuck on GHC 8.6.5?
    Default branch on ghcjs github is 8.6. 8.10 is a wip with commit from around a month ago. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Why Do We Need Transpilation into JavaScript?
    At present, here at Typeable we develop frontend in Haskell and use the web framework Reflex and the functional reactive programming (FRP). The source code in Haskell is transpiled into the JavaScript code using GHCJS. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Why supporting all programming languages is a bad idea
    In theory it is possible to write applications that run in the web browser in Java or C# or C++. There are compilers to compile Java to JavaScript or C++ to JavaScript/WebAssembly and a C# runtime that runs in the browser. In practice these technologies are very niche and only used for very few applications. The Cardano Wallet Daedalus is written in JavaScript even though most of the software for Cardano is... Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Web Components and GHCJS, you can also consider the following products

Mint - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning, and budget planning tools. Achieve your financial goals with Mint.

Fay - A proper subset of Haskell that compiles to JavaScript - faylang/fay

ReasonML - ReasonML is a new face to OCaml that--when coupled with BuckleScript--makes web development easy...

Imba - Take a whole lot of Ruby, a pinch of Python and some React, get Imba

Scala.js - Build robust front-end web applications in Scala with Scala.js

Haste - Decreases ping in video games.

Loading...